Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Problem with update to patches

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    19 Posts 3 Posters 1.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      rloeb @rloeb
      last edited by

      @rloeb Bottomline: the patch that was working is no longer working!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        System Patches 2.2.8 in 23.09?

        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Can't replicate that here. Applying the recommended patches allows rules with URL aliases to generate correctly. Without it I get the expected error:
          Unresolvable destination alias 'cloudflare' for rule 'Test URL Aliases' @ 2023-11-23 13:48:29

          Is that the error you see for each rule?

          R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            rloeb @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 Tes, System Patches 2.2.8.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              rloeb @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 Yes, that's the error message for each rule.
              Gonna try reinstalling System Patches.

              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                rloeb @rloeb
                last edited by

                @rloeb Reinstalled System Patches 2.2.8, made sure the "Fix URLs" patch is applied, rebooted, re-activated one rule based on an alias that references a URL list, and got the "Unresolvable destination" error.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Hmm, and yet manually adding that patch worked as expected in the previous System Patches package?

                  If you view the patch is it actually the same as the patch you applied before?

                  If you check /etc/inc/util.inc is the patch actually applied?

                  You aliases are just URL(IPS) type?

                  R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R
                    rloeb @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 I'm currently running without the patch and without the alias rules so my wife can do her black friday shopping! I suspect that the real problem was with the unbound DNS resolver...

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Ah, so it couldn't populate the alias? Yeah that's an issue if connectivity relies on those aliases.

                      R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R
                        rloeb @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10 Yup!

                        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • R
                          rloeb @rloeb
                          last edited by

                          @rloeb Back in the office and still trying to deal with this issue. Reinstalled System_Patches and ran "debug" on the URL patch. Doesn't apply properly. Got the following error message:

                          /usr/bin/patch --directory='/' -t --strip '2' -i '/usr/local/pkg/patches/a6cf534d0fa0297547f1e587a12729f9d7066bae.patch' --check --forward --ignore-whitespace

                          Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
                          The text leading up to this was:

                          |commit a6cf534d0fa0297547f1e587a12729f9d7066bae
                          |Author: Marcos Mendoza mmendoza@netgate.com
                          |Date: Wed Nov 8 10:44:26 2023 -0600
                          |
                          | Support URL IP aliases in alias_expand(). Fix #14947
                          |
                          |diff --git a/src/etc/inc/util.inc b/src/etc/inc/util.inc
                          |index 0e1640f4f5..2ef5196f6c 100644
                          |--- a/src/etc/inc/util.inc

                          +++ b/src/etc/inc/util.inc
                          Patching file etc/inc/util.inc using Plan A...
                          Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
                          Hunk #1 ignored at 2144.
                          Hunk #2 ignored at 2154.
                          2 out of 2 hunks ignored while patching etc/inc/util.inc
                          done
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Hmm, that's not an error. It implies the patch is already applied. I assume it's still throwing the error though? Or just the DNS issue?

                            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              rloeb @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 When the patch is active, and I activate a rule that uses an alias table, I get the URL error message.

                              How do I check that the patch was actually applied?

                              R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R
                                rloeb @rloeb
                                last edited by

                                @rloeb Incidentally, the system log shows that the URL tables are being updated. What does "Unresolvable source alias" mean? The data is there.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  carry2693a
                                  last edited by

                                  I see the same thing, except I was having an issue where it would buffer at 1:10 into any video. Tried all of the troubleshooting stuff and now I'm stuck with an app that won't open at all.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Open the file and check that the patch lines are actually there like:
                                    Screenshot from 2023-11-27 12-46-47.png

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      rloeb @stephenw10
                                      last edited by

                                      @stephenw10 I checked, and, yes, the patch exists at line 2078. However, if I activate a rule that depends on a URL alias, I get
                                      "Unresolvable source alias 'Akamai_auto' for rule 'Akamai' @ 2023-12-02 14:49:52"

                                      System log: b39c2773-6ca7-4e2d-976b-35c2377cba33-pfsense system log 12022023.txt

                                      Definition of the alias:
                                      Akamai_auto URL Table (IPs) https://github.com/SecOps-Institute/Akamai-ASN-and-IPs-List/blob/master/akamai_ip_cidr_blocks.lst
                                      Akamai_auto

                                      The alias is populated.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stephenw10S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        Does it actually populate the table in Diag > Tables?

                                        Does it work if you use https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SecOps-Institute/Akamai-ASN-and-IPs-List/master/akamai_ip_cidr_blocks.lst for thatlink instead?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.