Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SG-1100 Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh:

    Plus 23.09 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    3
    13
    1.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      LostInIgnorance @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 Nope, plenty of space and was able to replicate the issue twice now with the exact same results

      0cf405cd-b7ea-4df4-b22d-d6e4d1fc5aed-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Does it fail at the same step each time?

        L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          LostInIgnorance @stephenw10
          last edited by

          @stephenw10 Yep, this is from the 27th snapshot log

          The process will require 388 MiB more space.
          [1/88] Upgrading libxml2 from 2.10.3_1 to 2.10.4...
          [1/88] Extracting libxml2-2.10.4: .......... done
          [2/88] Upgrading php82 from 8.2.4 to 8.2.11...
          [2/88] Extracting php82-8.2.11: .......... done
          [3/88] Upgrading gettext-runtime from 0.21.1 to 0.22_1...
          [3/88] Extracting gettext-runtime-0.22_1: .......... done
          [4/88] Upgrading php82-zlib from 8.2.4 to 8.2.11...
          [4/88] Extracting php82-zlib-8.2.11: ........ done
          [5/88] Upgrading python39 from 3.9.16_2 to 3.9.17...
          [5/88] Extracting python39-3.9.17: .......... done
          [6/88] Upgrading python311 from 3.11.2_2 to 3.11.4...
          [6/88] Extracting python311-3.11.4: ..pid 530 (pkg-static), jid 0, uid 0, was killed: failed to reclaim memory
          Child process pid=530 terminated abnormally: Killed
          
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Hmm, I can't replicate that:

            The process will require 398 MiB more space.
            [1/88] Upgrading libxml2 from 2.10.3_1 to 2.10.4...
            [1/88] Extracting libxml2-2.10.4: .......... done
            [2/88] Upgrading php82 from 8.2.4 to 8.2.11...
            [2/88] Extracting php82-8.2.11: .......... done
            [3/88] Upgrading gettext-runtime from 0.21.1 to 0.22_1...
            [3/88] Extracting gettext-runtime-0.22_1: .......... done
            [4/88] Upgrading php82-zlib from 8.2.4 to 8.2.11...
            [4/88] Extracting php82-zlib-8.2.11: ........ done
            [5/88] Upgrading python39 from 3.9.16_2 to 3.9.17...
            [5/88] Extracting python39-3.9.17: .......... done
            [6/88] Upgrading python311 from 3.11.2_2 to 3.11.4...
            [6/88] Extracting python311-3.11.4: .......... done
            [7/88] Upgrading php82-xml from 8.2.4 to 8.2.11...
            [7/88] Extracting php82-xml-8.2.11: ......... done
            

            What packages do you have installed?

            L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              LostInIgnorance @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 Just FTP proxy and nmap

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                I'm still unable to replicate it.
                Are you able to try reinstalling and upgrading from a clean 23.05.1 install?

                L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • L
                  LostInIgnorance @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 I can try this later today and let you know of the outcome, though I was on 23.05.1 before the upgrade.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • L
                    LostInIgnorance
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 I reloaded the SG-1100 with the latest factory image and proceeded to do the upgrade with no error this time.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Hmm, OK. Odd. I haven't seen any other reports of that. Let us know if you see it again.

                      Steve

                      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kj32 @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10

                        The first SG-1100 seemed to upgrade just fine.

                        On the second SG-1100, I ran an upgrade from 23.01 to 23.05.1 that seemed uneventful. Then I tried to upgrade to 23.09, and ended up with this:

                        Starting CRON... done.
                        Starting package AWS VPC Wizard...done.
                        Starting package IPsec Profile Wizard...done.
                        .: cannot open /etc/rc.be_functions.sh: No such file or directory
                        Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh:

                        As far as I can tell, this SG-1100 was re-imaged with pfSense-plus-compat-recovery-23.01-RELEASE-aarch64.img.gz after a failed attempted upgrade to 23.01 and hasn't been touched since. (At this point, I basically used the SG-1100's to test the water before updating the production SG-3100.)

                        FYI.

                        Regards,

                        Ken

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Do you have an upgrade log from that?

                          Is it running an packages? We have seen some upgrades fail due to ram exhaustion that present as you see after rebooting.

                          Steve

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.