Would it be Forwarding or Outbound?
-
-
@o12eMaRkAbLeo and that tells me nothing.. Where is the new rule you created? you grep for Factorio - and thre is no rules on your lan for that in your gui post.
See above I created what was clearly a new rule TestRule - and then I look for that in my rules via sr and you can clearly see it there.
-
-
@o12eMaRkAbLeo so no rules are being added then..
Vs using some rule wiith a name on that you already have listed in your rules.. Wouldn't it have been easier and clearer to call it say "testrule:" or testnewrule..
-
This could be true but I wanted to involve everything that we are working on.
But technically that isn't true. I did at the ipv6 NAT rule I put in place...
-
@o12eMaRkAbLeo said in Would it be Forwarding or Outbound?:
at the ipv6 NAT rule
Huh - why would you create a IPv6 nat rule????? That makes no sense..
Could you just do a clear and simple test.. add a rule on lan, with a very easy to understand description that doesn't line up with what your doing.. like testnewrule and then look in your rules.. Do you see that new rule or not?
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/troubleshooting/firewall.html#ruleset-failing-to-load
-
-
@o12eMaRkAbLeo that is a horrible name to try and grep for.. pretty sure you would need to atleast quote that..
I mean do you have a bunch of other rules called testrule ?
Did your output ever get to done?
-
I turned pfBlocker off it was causing some errors and not allowing the reload of the filters to complete
-
@o12eMaRkAbLeo said in Would it be Forwarding or Outbound?:
not allowing the reload of the filters to complete
Well that looks like the problem solved then.. I see your static port in there now.
-
Thank you for all your assistance! It is up and working!
Just have to clean up pfBlocker and get 0 errors now...
-
@o12eMaRkAbLeo glad you got it sorted.. It was an odd one.. I did you had pfblocker there with auto rules. But figured you would of seen an error from before when I asked you to watch the reload.
