Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SG-1100 - [zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    15 Posts 2 Posters 847 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jvmack22 @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10

      Not much:

      • 2 workstations with VPN connecting to ext.office where servers are running. Nextcloud, Zimbra etc.
      • When workstations are not running, some 2-3 mobile phones at a time max. now and then. Thats it.
      • a satelite receiver connected with CCca*m to decode channels

      The only difference with the fresh install is that i've installed PfBlocker.
      Below the stats after 20 hours with PfBlocker disabled:

      15037/1733/16770 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
      5391/959/6350/59797 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
      5391/959 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache)
      1/761/762/29898 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
      0/0/0/8858 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
      0/0/0/4983 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
      14558K/5395K/19953K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total)
      0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
      0/0/0 requests for mbufs delayed (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
      0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters delayed (4k/9k/16k)
      0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
      0 sendfile syscalls
      0 sendfile syscalls completed without I/O request
      0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
      0 pages read by sendfile as part of a request
      0 pages were valid at time of a sendfile request
      0 pages were valid and substituted to bogus page
      0 pages were requested for read ahead by applications
      0 pages were read ahead by sendfile
      0 times sendfile encountered an already busy page
      0 requests for sfbufs denied
      0 requests for sfbufs delayed

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jvmack22 @stephenw10
        last edited by jvmack22

        @stephenw10

        Data Summary
        Minimum Average Maximum Last 95th Percentile
        user util. 0.92 % 4.88 % 23.12% 4.54 %
        nice util. 0.00 % 0.11 % 0.75% 0.30 %
        system util. 0.65 % 3.09 % 10.88% 3.48 %
        interrupt 0.00 % 0.23 % 3.59% 0.63 %
        processes 238.00 240.35 247.61 240.00

        Tomorrow I can see if its climbing, though I don't know what is mbuf in these monitoring graphs.

        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          The graphs should show here:

          Screenshot from 2023-12-14 19-15-56.png

          There's pretty much no traffic passing that test box though

          Steve

          J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jvmack22 @stephenw10
            last edited by jvmack22

            This post is deleted!
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jvmack22 @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10

              Sorry, just learned this function, never used it before :)

              Here you can see when installed from scratch, last coupld of days:

              Screenshot_20231214_203804.png

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jvmack22 @jvmack22
                last edited by jvmack22

                @jvmack22

                But there where no RAM issues I think in the SG-1100:
                (My main box Dell server 16Gb RAM hits 1 million Mbuff max. What are normal numbers?)

                Screenshot_20231214_204420.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  1M is waay higher than it ever needs to be but that's currently the default for x86.

                  The ~50K you see there is the default for the 1100. It does look like something is leaking there though.

                  What do you have configured on that box?

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jvmack22 @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10

                    • 2 workstations with VPN connecting to ext.office where servers are running. Nextcloud, Zimbra etc.
                    • When workstations are not running, some 2-3 mobile phones at a time max. now and then. Thats it.
                    • a satelite receiver connected with CCca*m to decode channels. (NOT streaming)

                    When it comes to installed packages it is just PfBlocker, nothing else on the default / fresh configuration.
                    It had many PRI1-2-3-4-5 lists on it. Switching Pfblocker off makes the differences of above.
                    What I'm trying now is just the most important blocklists, some 8-9 lists of PRI 1-2-3.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      So that's the OpenVPN on the firewall?

                      Do you have anything configured like igmpproxy or traffic shaping?

                      Anything less common like PPPoE server or L2TP?

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jvmack22 @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10

                        No nothing at all like that, just OpenVPN (and Pfblocker)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Just to be clear the workstations using a VPN are using the OpenVPN link on firewall? Rather than VPNs from each workstation directly?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.