Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SSL certs handling and HAproxy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    136 Posts 3 Posters 30.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      lewis
      last edited by

      One thing I notice is that even with the 'production' setting, the re-generated cert always shows staging;
      issuer=C = US, O = (STAGING) Let's Encrypt, CN = (STAGING) Artificial Apricot R3

      When I re-issue and it shows the green page, there is no mention of staging anywhere.

      It's nuts how many articles contradict each other when trying to find anything on this.

      kiokomanK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • kiokomanK
        kiokoman LAYER 8 @lewis
        last edited by

        @lewis
        7bacddb7-ecdf-4af5-8c9c-21989cd0e535-image.png

        so you have registered for production

        now you should see something with Issuer

        Acmecert: O=Let's Encrypt, CN=R3, C=US

        under system / certificates /certificates

        if you see it than you need to go to haproxy and change, under ssl offloading , the certificate

        bdfab39a-df00-4fa2-982d-7857d337b6c6-image.png

        ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
        Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
        we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
        Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • L
          lewis
          last edited by lewis

          Holy crap, I finally got it working.
          I don't even know where to start to show what I did because I tried so many things.
          The last thing I did was in the backend, changing the server list Table from port 80 to port 443 and enabling Encrypt(SSL).

          The main problem I have now is still not knowing what the correct configuration of the web server should be.
          It's using a self signed cert now but this is a stand alone web server. Some of them have lots of virtualhosts.

          And, what SSL options will be used? The ones on ACME/haproxy or the ones set in ssl.conf/httpd.conf on the web server?

          Plus, now I'd like to fix the 'load balanced' server that never actually worked.

          And, how can I forward the visiting IPs? I only see the firewall's IP in the logs which is not useful.
          I found this but it doesn't send the visiting IP;
          a1f97c18-6897-4202-9161-8026cb873c6c-image.png

          kiokomanK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • kiokomanK
            kiokoman LAYER 8 @lewis
            last edited by kiokoman

            @lewis
            if you can, don't use cert on web server just point to port 80
            people will connect to haproxy and use the cert from ACME/haproxy but haproxy will speak to the web server with the self signed cert

            on the backend add all the server that will do balance under "server list", set a Weight (10 / 20 /30 etc etc) and select round robin under load balancing

            backend but carefully read the warning

            567cc5b8-af5b-4e43-a2e2-4db5f33801bf-image.png

            ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
            Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
            we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
            Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              lewis
              last edited by

              I can't point to port 80 because all of the sites are built using https only.
              Any sites I'd like to add would be https.

              kiokomanK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • kiokomanK
                kiokoman LAYER 8 @lewis
                last edited by

                @lewis
                not a big problem, it's just for convenience, create a self signed cert with all the domains you have

                ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • L
                  lewis @kiokoman
                  last edited by

                  @kiokoman said in SSL certs handling and HAproxy:

                  @lewis
                  not a big problem, it's just for convenience, create a self signed cert with all the domains you have

                  What does that mean, 'with all of the domains'?
                  Do you mean you have to generate a self signed cert for each domain or there's a way to do one that has all of the names?

                  And more importantly, will https use the always updates SSL options that LE offers or will visitors end up using what ever the Apache server is configured with?

                  kiokomanK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • kiokomanK
                    kiokoman LAYER 8 @lewis
                    last edited by kiokoman

                    @lewis
                    visitors will use and see only the ACME cert

                    with openssl you can create 1 cert with all domains name

                    make a copy and edit openssl.cfg

                    Under the [ CA_default ] section, change the line (uncomment the line) # copy_extensions = copy to copy_extensions = copy

                    Under the [ v3_ca ] section,

                    change the line # subjectAltName=email:copy to subjectAltName=@alt_names

                    add a new line with extendedKeyUsage = serverAuth

                    Go to the end of the file and add
                    [ alt_names ]

                    if the server has multiple address expected to be used for connection, you should add multiple entries under [ alt_names ]. For example,

                    [ alt_names ]

                    DNS.1 = app.example.com

                    DNS.2 = app2.example.com

                    DNS.3 = app3.example.com

                    IP.1 = 192.168.1.1

                    IP.2 = 10.10.10.10

                    under cmd if you use windows:

                    set OPENSSL_CONF=C:\OpenSSL-Win64\bin\openssl.cfg (change the directory to where you have your modified copy of openssl.cfg)
                    openssl genrsa -out ServerKey.key 2048
                    openssl req -x509 -new -key ServerKey.key -sha256 -days 825 -out myCA.cer
                    

                    if you need pkcs12

                    openssl pkcs12 -export -out keystore.p12 -inkey ServerKey.key -in myCA.cer
                    

                    These are notes I have and they should still work... probably ...

                    ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                    Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                    we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                    Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • L
                      lewis
                      last edited by lewis

                      Getting the visitor IP is simple enough.
                      In httpd.conf, I changed;

                      LogFormat "%v %h %l %u %t "%r" %>s %b %D %^FB "%{Referer}i" "%{User-Agent}i"" combined
                      to
                      LogFormat "%v %a %l %u %t "%r" %>s %b %D %^FB "%{Referer}i" "%{User-Agent}i"" combined
                      (%h to %a)

                      And added this directive;
                      RemoteIPHeader X-Forwarded-For

                      In haproxy, Frontend, Advanced, I enabled;
                      6d37c7a4-b559-48e7-8736-80c7cb756995-image.png

                      Now I see the actual visitor IP.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • L
                        lewis @kiokoman
                        last edited by

                        @kiokoman said in SSL certs handling and HAproxy:

                        visitors will use and see only the ACME cert

                        Not sure I understand this. One cert can handle one or more virtual hosts on one web server?

                        The web servers do not have more than one IP, just one but some have lots of virtualhosts, so, different domain names.
                        And of course, since I have to use port 80/443 for many of those domains, I have a bunch of VIPs on pfsense.

                        if you need pkcs12

                        Don't even know what that is unless I look it up so probably not :).

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • kiokomanK
                          kiokoman LAYER 8
                          last edited by kiokoman

                          yes, both ACME and your self signed cert can handle more virtual hosts/domain names with only 1 cert, it's one of the reason why people use haproxy on the first place, 1 ip > many domains

                          ̿' ̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=(◕_◕)=ε/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿ ̿
                          Please do not use chat/PM to ask for help
                          we must focus on silencing this @guest character. we must make up lies and alter the copyrights !
                          Don't forget to Upvote with the 👍 button for any post you find to be helpful.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • L
                            lewis
                            last edited by

                            In the case that we've been working on, it's one domain on one web server.
                            There is another that should be redirected (301) to the main domain in the httpd.conf but I commented that out while working on this.
                            So maybe that's a good test to try and understand what this new thing (to me) is about.

                            I definitely don't understand how I can use just one LE cert on pfsense/acme to do this but I kind of understand doing it on the web servers.
                            On the web servers, I could also just create a self singed cert for every domain that's very long lasting. That I understand.

                            Getting into editing openssl and other things like that, I don't and could easily lose track of stuff like that. I'm looking for the easiest way that is a no brainer to maintain as I jump from one location to another so have a hard time keeping track of highly nuanced configs.

                            When you say using one certificate, and let's say we're talking about LE, I've created certs where you use '-d domain1.com -d domain2.com' etc. So I understand that any number of domains can be inserted into one cert. Is this what you mean? I assume so.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Yes the LE cert used by the HAProxy front end has to be valid for all hosts/domains it is accepting traffic for.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • L
                                lewis
                                last edited by

                                Since I have the single server working, now, moving on to the load balanced servers.

                                Those web servers are using a san share to get their certificates.
                                They don't have any self signed cert of course so what would the first step be?

                                Since they were not going through the haproxy, should I address that first or just do it all at once?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • L
                                  lewis
                                  last edited by

                                  My original plan was to have pfsense handle the cert encryption so that it could send all of the traffic to a varnish server on the LAN.
                                  I guess that means that no matter what, I would have to remove all ssl from each site/server so that pfsense could handle it then send traffic to varnish using port 80.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    No you can still use https between HAProxy and the backend servers if you have to. HAproxy sees all the traffic because the connection from clients are terminated there.

                                    It's just more common to use http to the backends because that traffic doesn't need to be encrypted so it's unnecessary loading on the servers.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • L
                                      lewis
                                      last edited by lewis

                                      Well, as you know, I've been able to get the one web server working but I've not touched the others for load balancing yet.
                                      I quickly tried forwarding the traffic using rules instead of nat the other day but that didn't work. Those web servers already have their own ssl certs and I'd like to tackle that later.

                                      I've been playing with trying to get varnish in the mix and wasting a huge number of hours on this.
                                      Again, nothing I find actually works so learning is difficult since there is nothing working to see yet only confusion.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stephenw10S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        Hmm, if you're using Varnish I'm not really sure why you would use HAProxy to be honest. Just forward all the traffic to the Varnish proxy and let it handle everything.
                                        Though I haven't used Varnish myself.

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • L
                                          lewis @stephenw10
                                          last edited by lewis

                                          @stephenw10 said in SSL certs handling and HAproxy:

                                          Hmm, if you're using Varnish I'm not really sure why you would use HAProxy to be honest. Just forward all the traffic to the Varnish proxy and let it handle everything.
                                          Though I haven't used Varnish myself.

                                          To clarify, I have three things I'm wanting to accomplish.

                                          1: Fix the what I thought were load balanced servers which are using or should be using haproxy.
                                          2: Wanted to add one single server using acme/haproxy to better understand how that works but also because of the following.
                                          3 I need to send traffic through varnish for caching.

                                          That traffic will be public to pfsense/acme then varnish.
                                          But, in some cases, it could be public to pfsense/acme/haproxy then to varnish.

                                          As I've had to spend so much time on this, and so know this now.
                                          Varnish's load balancing and failover features are less sophisticated and customizable compared to a dedicated lb like HAProxy.
                                          That might be enough in some cases of course.

                                          However, varnish and HAProxy can be used together effectively. HAProxy can distribute incoming traffic across multiple varnish instances.
                                          This combination leverages the strengths of both: load balancing from HAProxy and fast content delivery from varnish's cache.

                                          No matter any of this, other than the server I've gotten working, nothing else has worked so far. No article/documentation seems to cover the complete working process, there's always something missing.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • L
                                            lewis
                                            last edited by

                                            The main problem I'm having right now is no matter what I do, I see https connections to the varnish server from haproxy.

                                            I'm using a rule for the public ip to haproxy. acme is correctly handling the ssl cert.
                                            In the hap front end, I have the address as the VIP with https offloading.
                                            In the hap backend, I have the server list set to send to the varnish server on port 80.

                                            No matter what I've done so far, I still see https getting to varnish.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.