Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    dhcp issues 2 ip addresses to same computer on same subnet

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    20 Posts 5 Posters 882 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @cd
      last edited by johnpoz

      @cd is that same mac or different?

      BTW - there is really little reason to hide a mac address.. Unless its the mac address of your wifi router, nobody would ever see those - there is no way to find them?

      Now if if was the mac address of your wifi router - there are databases of war driving that maps out ssid mac of the wifi router, etc.. but for example the mac of my pc ethernet card..

      Ethernet adapter Local:
      
         Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : home.arpa
         Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller
         Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : B0-4F-13-0B-FD-16
         DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
         Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
         IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.9.100(Preferred)
         Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
         Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Tuesday, January 30, 2024 1:51:45 PM
         Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Saturday, February 3, 2024 1:51:45 PM
         Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.9.253
         DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.9.253
         DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.3.10
         NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
      

      Your saying your machine with 1 interface, which from that mac is a raspberry pi b8:27:eb is getting 2 Ips, or is one the wire and the other is wireless?

      Could we see the output of ifconfig on that pi..

      here is one of my pi's, I have the wifi disable.. its wired - wireless would be pointless

      pi@pihole:~ $ ifconfig
      eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
              inet 192.168.3.10  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.3.255
              inet6 fe80::3829:d17c:fb3d:1b4d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
              ether b8:27:eb:38:d8:4d  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
              RX packets 1497796  bytes 175263470 (167.1 MiB)
              RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
              TX packets 1413040  bytes 272568719 (259.9 MiB)
              TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
      
      lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
              inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
              inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
              loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
              RX packets 4419748  bytes 296933982 (283.1 MiB)
              RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
              TX packets 4419748  bytes 296933982 (283.1 MiB)
              TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
      
      pi@pihole:~ $ 
      

      Here I enabled the wifi interface, but didn't connect it to any network - or yeah it would grab and IP ;)

      pi@pihole:~ $ ifconfig
      eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
              inet 192.168.3.10  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.3.255
              inet6 fe80::3829:d17c:fb3d:1b4d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
              ether b8:27:eb:38:d8:4d  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
              RX packets 1498589  bytes 175322753 (167.2 MiB)
              RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
              TX packets 1413888  bytes 272940823 (260.2 MiB)
              TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
      
      lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
              inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
              inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
              loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
              RX packets 4419748  bytes 296933982 (283.1 MiB)
              RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
              TX packets 4419748  bytes 296933982 (283.1 MiB)
              TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
      
      wlan0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
              ether b8:27:eb:6d:8d:18  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
              RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
              RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
              TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
              TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
      
      pi@pihole:~ $ 
      

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cd @johnpoz
        last edited by cd

        @johnpoz Same Mac

        Here is full mac

        from PFSENSE dhcp lease page:

        192.168.40.14 b8:27:eb:d8:3c:ff pi2 2024/02/10 09:22:17 2024/02/10 11:22:17
        192.168.40.13 b8:27:eb:d8:3c:ff pi2

        Yes, the pi has wifi also. but the mac address for both ips identical. I would think that should be impossible.

        I see in your example, eth0 and wlan0 have different macs.

        S johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          serbus @cd
          last edited by serbus

          @cd

          Hello!

          Do you have both connman and dhcpd (dhclient) running?

          I have seen quite a few installs get hit with this lately...

          John

          Lex parsimoniae

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @cd
            last edited by johnpoz

            @cd said in dhcp issues 2 ip addresses to same computer on same subnet:

            but the mac address for both ips identical

            Something odd there.. Yes the 2 different interfaces should have slightly different macs.. I have seen for example just the last number being off by 1.. That is quite common.

            But the same?

            Did you change the mac of one of them.. Did you setup a bridge or something on the device?

            Could you post the output of ifconfig from your pi? Like I did

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              cd @serbus
              last edited by

              @serbus I don't know what conman is. Can you clarify?

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                cd @johnpoz
                last edited by

                @johnpoz 192.168.20.2 00:0f:60:04:53:15 pi2 2024/02/10 10:37:35 2024/02/10 12:37:35

                Notice this lease was very short lived. What i just did to get this was to disconnect pi from switch and plug wifi in.

                FYI, wifi subnet is 192.168.20.X Switch is 192.168.40.x from before

                I also notice that the dchp lease page take forever to update

                I have had issues for a long time with intermittent failure to reach machines on the network. On my tablet for example, to reach my 3d printer, i disconnect and reconnect wifi to get to machine. That works often.
                I have 3 printers on the 20 network. At any one time, i can reach printer A and not reach printer B over wifi.

                I have tried replacing the wifi ap, no help.

                But now this is wired issue. Confusing.

                C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  cd @cd
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz

                  Ok,

                  here is ifconfig from pi, accessed with only wifi
                  connected:

                  eth0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
                  inet 192.168.40.13 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.40.255
                  inet6 fe80::ba27:ebff:fed8:3cff prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
                  ether b8:27:eb:d8:3c:ff txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
                  RX packets 1041539 bytes 76256137 (72.7 MiB)
                  RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
                  TX packets 92664 bytes 15160845 (14.4 MiB)
                  TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                  lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
                  inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
                  inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
                  loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
                  RX packets 11 bytes 1605 (1.5 KiB)
                  RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
                  TX packets 11 bytes 1605 (1.5 KiB)
                  TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                  wlan0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
                  inet 192.168.20.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.20.255
                  inet6 fe80::1ead:69a5:2035:d36f prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
                  ether 00:0f:60:04:53:15 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
                  RX packets 1024 bytes 103044 (100.6 KiB)
                  RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
                  TX packets 89 bytes 13712 (13.3 KiB)
                  TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                  johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @cd
                    last edited by johnpoz

                    @cd well your macs are not the same there..

                    ether b8:27:eb:d8:3c:ff

                    ether 00:0f:60:04:53:15

                    00:0d:60
                    Lifetron Co.,Ltd

                    hmmm - is that some 3rd party wifi dongle or something?

                    edit:
                    Is that data from your lease table - just an OLD expired lease?

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                    C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      serbus @cd
                      last edited by

                      @cd

                      @cd

                      Connman is a network manager that will get dhcp addresses for interfaces. Sometimes, you can end up with 2 different network managers getting dhcp addresses for the same interface.

                      The syslog file on the client should tell the tale. Grep it for each ip and see which manager is requesting the address.

                          link/ether 42:58:0d:4f:e9:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
                          altname enp0s18
                          inet 10.12.12.21/24 brd 10.12.12.255 scope global dynamic ens18
                             valid_lft 691123sec preferred_lft 691123sec
                          inet 10.12.12.28/24 brd 10.12.12.255 scope global secondary ens18
                             valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
                      
                      
                      Feb 10 09:46:50 debian dhclient[407]: DHCPREQUEST for 10.12.12.21 on ens18 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
                      Feb 10 09:46:50 debian dhclient[407]: DHCPACK of 10.12.12.21 from 10.12.12.1
                      
                      
                      Feb 10 09:46:53 debian connmand[370]: ens18 {add} address 10.12.12.28/24 label ens18 family 2
                      
                      

                      John

                      Lex parsimoniae

                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        cd @serbus
                        last edited by cd

                        @serbus Ok,

                        I notice avahi. Could that be the issue?

                        Feb 10 10:22:45 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: eth0: adding route to 192.168.40.0/24
                        Feb 10 10:22:45 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: eth0: adding default route via 192.168.40.1
                        Feb 10 10:37:16 pi2 avahi-daemon[343]: Withdrawing address record for 192.168.40.2 on eth0.
                        Feb 10 10:37:16 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: eth0: deleting route to 192.168.40.0/24
                        Feb 10 10:37:16 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: eth0: deleting default route via 192.168.40.1
                        Feb 10 10:37:35 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: wlan0: rebinding lease of 192.168.20.11
                        Feb 10 10:37:35 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: wlan0: offered 192.168.20.2 from 192.168.20.1
                        Feb 10 10:37:35 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: wlan0: probing address 192.168.20.2/24
                        Feb 10 10:37:39 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: wlan0: leased 192.168.20.2 for 7200 seconds
                        Feb 10 10:37:39 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: wlan0: adding route to 192.168.20.0/24
                        Feb 10 10:37:39 pi2 dhcpcd[567]: wlan0: adding default route via 192.168.20.1
                        Feb 10 10:37:39 pi2 avahi-daemon[343]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface wlan0.IPv4 with address 192.168.20.2.
                        Feb 10 10:37:39 pi2 avahi-daemon[343]: Registering new address record for 192.168.20.2 on wlan0.IPv4.
                        Feb 10 11:01:41 pi2 dhclient[336]: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.40.13 on eth0 to 192.168.40.1 port 67

                        When i greped syslog, did not see conman in there.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          cd @johnpoz
                          last edited by cd

                          @johnpoz

                          UPDATE: Rebooting pi got rid of the eth0 address on pi below:

                          eth0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
                          ether b8:27:eb:d8:3c:ff txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
                          RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
                          RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
                          TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
                          TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                          lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
                          inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
                          inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
                          loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
                          RX packets 10 bytes 1552 (1.5 KiB)
                          RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
                          TX packets 10 bytes 1552 (1.5 KiB)
                          TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                          wlan0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
                          inet 192.168.20.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.20.255
                          inet6 fe80::1ead:69a5:2035:d36f prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
                          ether 00:0f:60:04:53:15 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
                          RX packets 141 bytes 16931 (16.5 KiB)
                          RX errors 0 dropped 1 overruns 0 frame 0
                          TX packets 66 bytes 11381 (11.1 KiB)
                          TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                          I am logged into pi from wifi
                          No cable connected to it.
                          So seems pi thinks it has 2 addresses now but
                          pfsense says only the one i am wifiing into it with.

                          I just noticed avahi entries in syslog, but pfsense has that service disabled.

                          FYI, i really don't know if i even need avahi, not sure i understand.

                          This is the dhcp table from pfsense.

                          192.168.20.2	00:0f:60:04:53:15	pi2		2024/02/10 11:37:39	2024/02/10 13:37:39
                          

                          Ok, this is ifconfig from pi, right now.

                          eth0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
                          inet 192.168.40.13 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.40.255
                          inet6 fe80::ba27:ebff:fed8:3cff prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
                          ether b8:27:eb:d8:3c:ff txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
                          RX packets 1041539 bytes 76256137 (72.7 MiB)
                          RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
                          TX packets 92664 bytes 15160845 (14.4 MiB)
                          TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                          lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
                          inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
                          inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
                          loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
                          RX packets 11 bytes 1605 (1.5 KiB)
                          RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
                          TX packets 11 bytes 1605 (1.5 KiB)
                          TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                          wlan0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
                          inet 192.168.20.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.20.255
                          inet6 fe80::1ead:69a5:2035:d36f prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
                          ether 00:0f:60:04:53:15 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
                          RX packets 10340 bytes 859067 (838.9 KiB)
                          RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
                          TX packets 8458 bytes 8131289 (7.7 MiB)
                          TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            serbus @cd
                            last edited by

                            @cd

                            Using your example of 2 ips on the same wired mac...

                            192.168.40.14 b8:27:eb:d8:3c:ff pi2 2024/02/10 09:22:17 2024/02/10 11:22:17
                            192.168.40.13 b8:27:eb:d8:3c:ff pi2
                            

                            ...you could try something like...

                            grep -E '192.168.40.14|192.168.40.13' /var/log/syslog*
                            

                            ...to see who grabbed them and when.

                            John

                            Lex parsimoniae

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              cd
                              last edited by

                              ok,
                              I notice for another device, (merc)
                              the PFSENSE is giving out 2 addresses.

                              192.168.20.205	b8:27:eb:da:04:e2	merc		n/a	n/a   That is the static address, and is correct.
                              
                              192.168.20.7	34:7d:e4:4f:ba:b8	merc		2024/02/10 11:50:42	2024/02/10 13:50:42  That is dyamically allocated.  and goes away immediately.
                              

                              Merc is a rpi with only wifi access.

                              from dhcp log on pfsense:

                              Feb 10 11:50:42 kea-dhcp4 90601 INFO [kea-dhcp4.leases.0x19d9d3616d00] DHCP4_LEASE_ALLOC [hwtype=1 34:7d:e4:4f:ba:b8], cid=[01:34:7d:e4:4f:ba:b8], tid=0x6ef47ffc: lease 192.168.20.7 has been allocated for 7200 seconds

                              Why would it do this if it already has a static address set?

                              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • johnpozJ
                                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @cd
                                last edited by

                                @cd said in dhcp issues 2 ip addresses to same computer on same subnet:

                                Why would it do this if it already has a static address set?

                                Don't use kea yet, would be my suggestion

                                https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/2-7-1.html#rn-2-7-1-kea

                                Many features have yet to be implemented.. It is "preview" of what is to come..

                                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JKnottJ
                                  JKnott @cd
                                  last edited by

                                  @cd said in dhcp issues 2 ip addresses to same computer on same subnet:

                                  Is that a problem switch?

                                  Yes, though it may depend on the firmware version. I believe @johnpoz can advise better.

                                  PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
                                  i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
                                  UniFi AC-Lite access point

                                  I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.