VPN gateway and pfSense router
-
@cyberconsultants So option one is prefer? Is it correct?
-
@Antibiotic if you absolutely need to use this other VPN device but still want to make use of pfSense's security services... then yes, #1 is the best option.
you're correct that if you put the VPN device before pfSense (#2), then pfSense/Suricata/pfBlocker/etc. would have no way to inspect the encrypted VPN traffic passing through it.
-
@cyberconsultants Finally))) Thank's
-
But, yes, why use two devices for that?
-
@stephenw10 I'm bought GLInet 2500A small VPN gateway before and don't have any ideas, how better to use with pfSense)))
-
Well you don't have to use it at all.
-
@stephenw10 Could be but filling yourself that a wasted money, better use it)))
-
Ha! It's running OpenWRT? You could probably run pihole on it or something similar.
-
@stephenw10 Yea OpenWRT but 21.02 snapshot officially, dont know why not a last release. You think its possible running pihole on him?
-
@Antibiotic This box officially support AdguardHome in build.
-
I don't know about pihole specifically by adguard does much the same thing and is in the OpenWRT software repo.
