Pfsense and hostname resolution
-
Yes thanks.
I did remove 8.8.8.8 and DNS resolver works:
~ ping jeedom.local.lan PING jeedom.local.lan (192.168.1.12): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.1.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=10.160 msbut:
➜ ~ ping google.com ping: cannot resolve google.com: Unknown host ➜ ~ ping google.comI don't know where is my mistake
-
@rjcab if your going to forward with unbound.. make sure you disable dnssec.. It can be very problematic when you forward, and serves no point.
Or just uncheck forwarding in unbound and let it resolve.
-
like this:
but dosen't work :(
-
@rjcab well why is the question - is your connection blocking roots? dns in general - are you using some vpn? There have been a bunch of threads lately about nord intercepting dns traffic for example..
from a cmd line on pfsense do a simple dig trace..
23.09.1-RELEASE][admin@sg4860.home.arpa]/root: dig www.googe.com +trace ; <<>> DiG 9.18.16 <<>> www.googe.com +trace ;; global options: +cmd . 65798 IN NS j.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS k.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS l.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS m.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS a.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS b.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS c.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS d.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS e.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS f.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS g.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS h.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN NS i.root-servers.net. . 65798 IN RRSIG NS 8 0 518400 20240409050000 20240327040000 30903 . uF8On7dU364u/1APqsZDUQ/yELDC0Q2qBe/VOS9rFdj0GWeEx23rJO7e u1RBxmM8cYPhXGREOoSCd7eZdJOX+S935JjmvCAQ2VKX9oWPq4SSYl1O S4st+q/LZvE6PSJcrEr+C3lGW0nk9X00CSeMspy5CNpcql9FP9L+AfWI 2BoSiph4C1Y4Sjck2i40KyM2r619CJtwgendnDVaN17ADJoObB1Hh7VH TvCCNtSICUxptHxNOEgIUa9VLcRFLXZytwvxhN0DkeK6j/jBrv6W3IAS uYUzYYpfZhyp+ip97758xUpIHtNQzSwdZetrv+EC5mDWPCMvfnTDcXTx zkIS+g== ;; Received 525 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 0 ms com. 172800 IN NS l.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS h.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS m.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS a.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS k.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS b.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS c.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS f.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS d.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS i.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS e.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS j.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS g.gtld-servers.net. com. 86400 IN DS 19718 13 2 8ACBB0CD28F41250A80A491389424D341522D946B0DA0C0291F2D3D7 71D7805A com. 86400 IN RRSIG DS 8 1 86400 20240409170000 20240327160000 30903 . BeqXEhueT8CzqQiy1AF0tlI2GOSdpCvFv7WpfE87quXLLJDCPc9dQvm9 6jbzwIyt3SzdqDQg+SJxTYoTi4EvEMJxwGcnQAJAm5YcrVL8Lg3Mw4Uo r2p/Xb0eCsUUgDJOu7sU3BOmIzdwelAtfd/j2uqkVNtQIu67reI95xux kypY/sZekggzudrrh6AXZgZDwENLuPZUpZdYNkU5dMPrhbOiQpumPEfJ n/Z4N7Aq3sjof+MV9Zv2ySP/2vfxoCmQfkeya3jB1LvUeyWtXxdxpsEo jSKux31/CrhT3Z+NED9mv7Qxyb6DiFjeft2Fwo23oZldSdlBFJXd3kKL 4qDL1w== ;; Received 1176 bytes from 202.12.27.33#53(m.root-servers.net) in 54 ms googe.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.hsicell.com. googe.com. 172800 IN NS ns2.hsicell.com. CK0POJMG874LJREF7EFN8430QVIT8BSM.com. 86400 IN NSEC3 1 1 0 - CK0Q2D6NI4I7EQH8NA30NS61O48UL8G5 NS SOA RRSIG DNSKEY NSEC3PARAM CK0POJMG874LJREF7EFN8430QVIT8BSM.com. 86400 IN RRSIG NSEC3 13 2 86400 20240402042515 20240326031515 4534 com. ychk678G5UM6KBOrkgzAFJFDbABT0ZGSxn9UfrDSR8PN61oqXASJnuv7 G/ZyNEA4NZ0AQjDIthrA9VDCDOBOLg== 1TIGO4C7QL50GVJJT0D07PBKRG635RSM.com. 86400 IN NSEC3 1 1 0 - 1TIGST5CJ1UA1R58QTH9RGKOM94L5MF8 NS DS RRSIG 1TIGO4C7QL50GVJJT0D07PBKRG635RSM.com. 86400 IN RRSIG NSEC3 13 2 86400 20240402044039 20240326033039 4534 com. L6WtUXKT8ZbYJDaLEA74DIygNdCM6qwI3z5luRiR3ou7SjdY81Xg2lz7 6EQKPaeZ7b5IVzpYcz/ft26Bss+GFA== ;; Received 475 bytes from 192.55.83.30#53(m.gtld-servers.net) in 8 ms www.googe.com. 3600 IN A 162.243.10.151 ;; Received 58 bytes from 192.241.232.216#53(ns2.hsicell.com) in 66 ms [23.09.1-RELEASE][admin@sg4860.home.arpa]/root:This is exactly what unbound does in resolve mode - if that doesn't work, then no your not going to be able to resolve.
-
Hello @johnpoz
Thanks again for your support.
here what I've done:[2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.local.lan]/root: dig www.google.com +trace ; <<>> DiG 9.18.19 <<>> www.google.com +trace ;; global options: +cmd ;; Received 28 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 1 ms [2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.local.lan]/root: ping google.com ping: Unknown host [2.7.2-RELEASE][admin@pfSense.local.lan]/root: ping jeedom.local.lan PING jeedom.local.lan (192.168.1.12): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.1.12: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.265 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.261 ms ^C --- jeedom.local.lan ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.261/0.263/0.265/0.002 ms -
@rjcab said in Pfsense and hostname resolution:
; <<>> DiG 9.18.19 <<>> www.google.com +trace
;; global options: +cmd
;; Received 28 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 1 mswell you got something wrong there for sure if you can not even get the root servers back...
So no I don't see how you could "resolve" anything.
-
more I deep dive in Pfsense, less I am good at.
*** Welcome to pfSense 2.7.2-RELEASE (amd64) on pfSense *** WAN (wan) -> re1 -> v4: 192.168.10.253/32 LAN (lan) -> re0 -> v4: 192.168.1.1/24And from terminal pfsense I am not able to ping WAN interface of my Box router which is 192.168.10.254 from a fresh install:
[2.7.2-RELEASE][root@pfSense.local.lan]/root: ping 192.168.1.1 PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.110 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.134 ms ^C --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.110/0.122/0.134/0.012 ms [2.7.2-RELEASE][root@pfSense.local.lan]/root: ping 192.168.10.254 PING 192.168.10.254 (192.168.10.254): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: No route to host ping: sendto: No route to hostSeems I have a route issue but automatic rules are here:
-
-
@johnpoz Oh my god, such a stupid mistake. the 4 eyes principle works once again ! thanks a lot
-
@rjcab does the dig +trace work now?
