Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Problem with TCP and GRE tunnel

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    64 Posts 3 Posters 7.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      StomperG @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 On the local WAN i literally see 0 lines of logs during de pcap

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        StomperG @stephenw10
        last edited by StomperG

        @stephenw10 I just need to run this 2 commands and wait? Or did i need to do something else on the VM with the problem? And the server IP is the GRE IP right?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Hmm, are you filtering the pcap on the local pf?

          Yes the server side runs continually until you kill it. The client will run for 30s by default.
          https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=iperf3

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            StomperG @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10

            Server:
            46876a21-edd6-4780-a8e7-19f8d544cf79-image.png

            Client:
            7c51ef3c-a7fa-4f77-927c-797f85719014-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Hmm, same both ways?

              Try using one of the other IPs on the server as the target. The GRE endpoint IP can behave in an odd way.

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                StomperG @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 I tried but or give me firewall problem because the port isnt exposed or give me that

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Which way are you testing? The server end should listen on all available IPs by default. I would expect the client end to have a route to any of them.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    StomperG @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10 Im starting the server on the VPC (from the company where i bought the IP's and VPC) and client on the local pf VM

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Ok so you should be able to use the VPC WAN address as the target for the client.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        StomperG @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10
                        dfa21eb8-9f3c-42e7-baeb-cc5591faa967-image.png

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Aha, and that could be the problem. That IP is in the same /24 as the local LAN side clients. If you have those set to a /24 subnet it will try to ARP for it directly and fail.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            StomperG @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 Uh, im very noob with this sorry, what exacly i need to change?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stephenw10S
                              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                              last edited by

                              Ok we're back to how the VPC is providing the IPs to you. You have 4 consecutive IPs at the local pf LAN? Including the pf LAN interface address?

                              The VPC pf WAN address is not consecutive to those?

                              You probably need to device those into to subnets so routing works correctly.

                              The routing table at the local pf cannot include the remote side WAN address.

                              The remote side must be using a smaller subnet than /24 because otherwise connectivity would be completely broken.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                StomperG @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                @stephenw10 But my lan IP (185.113.141.1 ) is private on my lan and is the public gateway from the ISP and isn't being forwared trough the tunnel. My 4 ips are (185.113.141.214, 185.113.141.215,185.113.141.216, 185.113.141.217)
                                On the VPC pf i've 185.113.141.132 as WAN IP

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenw10S
                                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                  last edited by

                                  What subnets do you have on those interfaces?

                                  @StomperG said in Problem with TCP and GRE tunnel:

                                  my lan IP (185.113.141.1 ) is private on my lan and is the public gateway from the ISP

                                  Hmm do you mean the LAN interface on the local pf is using the gateway IP address of the VPC side pf?

                                  That would certainly break routing. It's surprising that ping works to be honest.

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    StomperG @stephenw10
                                    last edited by StomperG

                                    @stephenw10
                                    Local Pf:
                                    8acfa2f1-4fbc-410e-884a-50c652b59cec-image.png
                                    1bb6e573-7ec1-450c-a1c9-6d699ce1bd41-image.png

                                    Remote Pf:
                                    2e2afe2e-dfa9-4b32-a4af-48b92bedbbb5-image.png
                                    aaf30f91-87b1-49bd-b367-87011ebd73f7-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stephenw10S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by

                                      What subnet size do you have on the local pf LAN or the hosts on it?

                                      What subnet size is on the VPC pf WAN?

                                      The fact this works at all implies the VPC provider must be routing the additional IPs to the VPN WAN address.

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        StomperG @stephenw10
                                        last edited by

                                        @stephenw10 All ips I have are "single" i dont have an entire subnet

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Yeah those IPs are inconveniently not in a single /29!

                                          But what subnet sizes (masks) do you have set on the interfaces?

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            StomperG @stephenw10
                                            last edited by

                                            @stephenw10

                                            Local pf:
                                            85dd52c0-40b9-4b17-ac6a-d9dfe1064e3d-image.png
                                            7f5b282b-9b1c-47cf-a122-7373bf85a918-image.png
                                            9a9fec18-7a7f-4078-a301-3d107feee0a8-image.png

                                            VPC pf:
                                            a629ce5c-2652-48c2-a6d1-c70f9498f3a5-image.png
                                            313dd502-4266-4a7f-8c54-3a3eb0606b62-image.png

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.