Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Windows 10 nslookup not working on 2.4 beta

    DHCP and DNS
    2
    24
    3.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      bimmerdriver
      last edited by

      I have two independent lans, one running 2.3.4, one running 2.4 beta. Both are identically configured with unbound.

      I have windows 10 clients on both lans.

      If I do nslookup on the 2.3.4 lan, it works properly.

      If I do nslookup on the 2.4 beta lan, it fails.

      Screen captures are attached.

      Any idea what could be causing this?
      ![nslookup 2.3.4.PNG](/public/imported_attachments/1/nslookup 2.3.4.PNG)
      ![nslookup 2.3.4.PNG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/nslookup 2.3.4.PNG_thumb)
      ![nslookup 2.4 beta.PNG](/public/imported_attachments/1/nslookup 2.4 beta.PNG)
      ![nslookup 2.4 beta.PNG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/nslookup 2.4 beta.PNG_thumb)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        Well looks like your query was REFUSED!!  So do you not have your acls setup for unbound to allow your query from where your doing the query?

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          bimmerdriver
          last edited by

          @johnpoz:

          Well looks like your query was REFUSED!!  So do you not have your acls setup for unbound to allow your query from where your doing the query?

          Say what?!? I have no idea what you are referring to. I compared the unbound settings on the 2.3.4 and 2.4 beta systems and I did not notice any differences. Please elaborate.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            I am talking about the ACLs that are part of unbound - normally pfsense will auto create these for you.  So either something went wrong with that or you disabled the automatic ACL creation and didn't create the acl or did it wrong.

            You can see your getting REFUSED - not that it didn't answer you or timed out, or couldn't find what you were looking for (nxdomain) it REFUSED your query..

            Your using ipv6, did you try via ipv4?  Dig is also much better tool for debugging dns.  You can install dig on windows without any issues.. It is a must have for me on any windows box ;)

            What snapshot of 2.4 are you running.. I on purpose turn off the auto creation of the ACLs because I play with them all the time testing stuff, and don't want any auto created ACLs.. That is why you see my check mark disabling them, and then ACL created that allows snoop from my local networks.

            aclunbound.png
            aclunbound.png_thumb
            digtopfsenseforgoogleAAAA.png
            digtopfsenseforgoogleAAAA.png_thumb
            ipv6snlookuptopfsense.png
            ipv6snlookuptopfsense.png_thumb

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              bimmerdriver
              last edited by

              I'm running the latest snapshot, which was built yesterday.

              I have never touched any of the settings for ACLs. They are all unchecked and there is no access control list.

              I wonder if there is a bug in the latest snapshot. I've never had this problem before.

              There doesn't seem to be a way to choose the protocol with nslookup so I tried from a ubuntu server on the same lan. Here is the output from dig. Definitely a problem with ipv6.

              root@ubuntu:~# dig -4 google.com
              
              ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> -4 google.com
              ;; global options: +cmd
              ;; Got answer:
              ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 26615
              ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
              
              ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
              ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
              ;; QUESTION SECTION:
              ;google.com.                    IN      A
              
              ;; ANSWER SECTION:
              google.com.             300     IN      A       216.58.193.78
              
              ;; Query time: 18 msec
              ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.1#53(192.168.1.1)
              ;; WHEN: Mon Jun 12 14:38:25 PDT 2017
              ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
              
              root@ubuntu:~# dig -6 google.com
              
              ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> -6 google.com
              ;; global options: +cmd
              ;; Got answer:
              ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED, id: 7238
              ;; flags: qr rd ad; QUERY: 0, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
              ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
              
              ;; Query time: 0 msec
              ;; SERVER: 2001:a:b:e800:215:5dff:fe5c:e21e#53(2001:a:b:e800:215:5dff:fe5c:e21e)
              ;; WHEN: Mon Jun 12 14:38:30 PDT 2017
              ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 12
              

              Some of the dns resolver settings are attached. I tried to enable the setting you suggested. It did not result in an ACL being created and it did not change the behaviour of nslookup or dig. I was not able to access the internet after doing so, so I changed it back.

              ![Capture 1.PNG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Capture 1.PNG)
              ![Capture 1.PNG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Capture 1.PNG_thumb)
              ![Capture 2.PNG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Capture 2.PNG)
              ![Capture 2.PNG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Capture 2.PNG_thumb)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • B
                bimmerdriver
                last edited by

                I tried to create an ACL. I used the prefix/64 for the network mask. When I clicked save, there was an error, saying I should have entered an ipv6 address. Am I missing something?!?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bimmerdriver
                  last edited by

                  Stranger by the minute. Now nslookup is working on the windows 10 pc and dig is working on the linux server. The settings are unchanged.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by

                    you got refused on ipv6 and worked on ipv4.

                    Yeah you would have to create an ACL - and yes you would have to put in your correct prefix, etc..

                    aclunbund.png
                    aclunbund.png_thumb

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      bimmerdriver
                      last edited by

                      @johnpoz:

                      you got refused on ipv6 and worked on ipv4.

                      Yeah you would have to create an ACL - and yes you would have to put in your correct prefix, etc..

                      I don't think so. nslookup on windows and dig on llinux both just started working. I just installed dig on windows and it's working also. I have not created an ACL or changed any settings. As I said, on my 2.3.4 system, the settings are the same and it was working all along. Now the 2.4 beta system is working as well.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • johnpozJ
                        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                        last edited by

                        You would have to create an ACL if your not using the auto configured ACLs..

                        What could of happened is your IPv6 range changed and the auto acl hadn't updated for ipv6 for some reason.  I am not really a fan of auto stuff like that which is why I create my own acls.  And if you had any downstream networks the auto stuff wouldn't work either.

                        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B
                          bimmerdriver
                          last edited by

                          @johnpoz:

                          You would have to create an ACL if your not using the auto configured ACLs..

                          What could of happened is your IPv6 range changed and the auto acl hadn't updated for ipv6 for some reason.  I am not really a fan of auto stuff like that which is why I create my own acls.  And if you had any downstream networks the auto stuff wouldn't work either.

                          Okay, understood. Makes sense. Cheers.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            bimmerdriver
                            last edited by

                            More dns6 strangeness today. I updated to the latest snapshot and no difference. dns4 is okay, but dns6 is not working. I restarted unbound, but it made no difference. I'll try the ACL.

                            This is from a windows 10 client:

                            C:\Users\User\Downloads\BIND9.10.5.x64>dig google.com
                            
                            ; <<>> DiG 9.10.5 <<>> google.com
                            ;; global options: +cmd
                            ;; Got answer:
                            ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 50274
                            ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
                            
                            ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
                            ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
                            ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                            ;google.com.                    IN      A
                            
                            ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                            google.com.             300     IN      A       172.217.3.174
                            
                            ;; Query time: 15 msec
                            ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.1#53(192.168.1.1)
                            ;; WHEN: Wed Jun 14 17:46:27 Pacific Daylight Time 2017
                            ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
                            
                            C:\Users\User\Downloads\BIND9.10.5.x64>dig -6  google.com
                            
                            ; <<>> DiG 9.10.5 <<>> -6 google.com
                            ;; global options: +cmd
                            ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
                            
                            C:\Users\User\Downloads\BIND9.10.5.x64>nslookup google.com
                            Server:         192.168.1.1
                            Address:        192.168.1.1#53
                            
                            Non-authoritative answer:
                            Name:   google.com
                            Address: 172.217.3.174
                            
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              bimmerdriver
                              last edited by

                              ACL made no difference. I added my ipv6 prefix::/64 and my lan subnet 192.168.1.0/24. I checked the setting to Disable Auto-added Access Control. I applied the changes. It made no difference so I restarted unbound. That also made no difference.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • B
                                bimmerdriver
                                last edited by

                                Further info. On my pfsense 2.3.4 network, the first hop of tracert -4 google is the pfsense router. Here, it's skipped. I don't recognize the address of the first hop.

                                C:\Users\User\Downloads\BIND9.10.5.x64>tracert -4 google.com
                                
                                Tracing route to google.com [172.217.3.174]
                                over a maximum of 30 hops:
                                
                                  1     8 ms     8 ms     6 ms  10.31.238.1
                                  2     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  154.11.10.11
                                  3    10 ms    18 ms     9 ms  72.14.220.60
                                  4     9 ms     9 ms     8 ms  108.170.245.113
                                  5     9 ms     9 ms     8 ms  108.170.233.159
                                  6    10 ms     8 ms     9 ms  sea15s11-in-f174.1e100.net [172.217.3.174]
                                
                                Trace complete.
                                
                                C:\Users\User\Downloads\BIND9.10.5.x64>tracert -6 google.com
                                
                                Tracing route to google.com [2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e]
                                over a maximum of 30 hops:
                                
                                  1     2 ms    15 ms     5 ms  pfSense.localdomain [2001:x:y:e800:215:5dff:fe5c:e21e]
                                  2    15 ms    15 ms     9 ms  sttlwawbgr80.bb.telus.com [2001:568:1::50a]
                                  3    10 ms    10 ms    11 ms  2001:4860:1:1:0:354:0:4
                                  4     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  2001:4860:0:1041::1
                                  5     9 ms     9 ms     8 ms  2001:4860:0:1::9bf
                                  6     9 ms     9 ms    11 ms  sea15s11-in-x0e.1e100.net [2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e]
                                
                                Trace complete.
                                
                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  "I don't recognize the address of the first hop."

                                  "1    8 ms    8 ms    6 ms  10.31.238.1"

                                  8 ms for a first hop is HORRIBLE!!!  this is your lan??

                                  If you do not recognize the first hop then your network is F'd up now isnt it ;)

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    bimmerdriver
                                    last edited by

                                    @johnpoz:

                                    "I don't recognize the address of the first hop."

                                    "1    8 ms    8 ms    6 ms  10.31.238.1"

                                    8 ms for a first hop is HORRIBLE!!!  this is your lan??

                                    If you do not recognize the first hop then your network is F'd up now isnt it ;)

                                    Yah, doh. I think it's pretty clear something is effed up, but what? I wonder if I should reinstall pfsense. There's nothing else to the network. It's virtual.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                      last edited by

                                      that has nothing to do with pfsense if 10.31.238.1 is not pfsense..  8ms that sure is not lan latency….

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B
                                        bimmerdriver
                                        last edited by

                                        @johnpoz:

                                        that has nothing to do with pfsense if 10.31.238.1 is not pfsense..  8ms that sure is not lan latency….

                                        I checked on my 2.3.4 system. That address must be my isp. It's the second hop on my 2.3.4 system. The first hop is pfsense. I downloaded the latest 2.4 beta snapshot and installed it from scratch without restoring any config files. I had snort and openvpn installed previously, but I did not reinstall them. The particular problem of pfsense not showing up in the first hop of traceroute is gone, but there is still some strange behaviour.

                                        Windows 10

                                        Note, dig -6 not working.

                                        
                                        C:\Users\User>Downloads\BIND9.10.5.x64\dig -4 google.com
                                        
                                        ; <<>> DiG 9.10.5 <<>> -4 google.com
                                        ;; global options: +cmd
                                        ;; Got answer:
                                        ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39144
                                        ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
                                        
                                        ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
                                        ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
                                        ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                        ;google.com.                    IN      A
                                        
                                        ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                                        google.com.             260     IN      A       172.217.3.174
                                        
                                        ;; Query time: 15 msec
                                        ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.1#53(192.168.1.1)
                                        ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 15 14:07:11 Pacific Daylight Time 2017
                                        ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
                                        
                                        C:\Users\User>Downloads\BIND9.10.5.x64\dig -6 google.com
                                        
                                        ; <<>> DiG 9.10.5 <<>> -6 google.com
                                        ;; global options: +cmd
                                        ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
                                        
                                        C:\Users\User>tracert -4 google.com
                                        
                                        Tracing route to google.com [172.217.3.174]
                                        over a maximum of 30 hops:
                                        
                                          1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  pfSense.localdomain [192.168.1.1]
                                          2     6 ms     8 ms     6 ms  10.31.238.1
                                          3     9 ms     8 ms    10 ms  154.11.10.11
                                          4     9 ms     9 ms    11 ms  72.14.220.60
                                          5    11 ms    10 ms    11 ms  108.170.245.113
                                          6    10 ms     9 ms    11 ms  108.170.233.159
                                          7     9 ms     8 ms     9 ms  sea15s11-in-f174.1e100.net [172.217.3.174]
                                        
                                        Trace complete.
                                        
                                        C:\Users\User>tracert -6 google.com
                                        
                                        Tracing route to google.com [2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e]
                                        over a maximum of 30 hops:
                                        
                                          1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  pfSense.localdomain [2001:a:b:d800:215:5dff:fe5c:e21e]
                                          2    14 ms     6 ms     5 ms  node-1w7jr9n36nixrvaceajc2pstq.ipv6.telus.net [2001:569:2:f::2e]
                                          3    10 ms    10 ms     9 ms  sttlwawbgr80.bb.telus.com [2001:568:1::50a]
                                          4     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  2001:4860:1:1:0:354:0:4
                                          5     9 ms    10 ms     8 ms  2001:4860:0:1040::1
                                          6    10 ms    11 ms     9 ms  2001:4860:0:1::9bd
                                          7     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  sea15s11-in-x0e.1e100.net [2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e]
                                        
                                        Trace complete.
                                        
                                        C:\Users\User>ping -4 google.com
                                        
                                        Pinging google.com [172.217.3.174] with 32 bytes of data:
                                        Reply from 172.217.3.174: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=57
                                        Reply from 172.217.3.174: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
                                        Reply from 172.217.3.174: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=57
                                        Reply from 172.217.3.174: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=57
                                        
                                        Ping statistics for 172.217.3.174:
                                            Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
                                        Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
                                            Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 14ms, Average = 11ms
                                        
                                        C:\Users\User>ping -6 google.com
                                        
                                        Pinging google.com [2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e] with 32 bytes of data:
                                        Reply from 2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e: time=9ms
                                        Reply from 2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e: time=10ms
                                        Reply from 2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e: time=11ms
                                        Reply from 2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e: time=11ms
                                        
                                        Ping statistics for 2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e:
                                            Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
                                        Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
                                            Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 10ms
                                        
                                        

                                        ubuntu 16.04 lts

                                        Note, dig -6 returns ipv4 address, traceroute -6 and ping6 fail.

                                        
                                        root@ubuntu-vpn:~# dig -4 google.com
                                        
                                        ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> -4 google.com
                                        ;; global options: +cmd
                                        ;; Got answer:
                                        ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 18870
                                        ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
                                        
                                        ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
                                        ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
                                        ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                        ;google.com.                    IN      A
                                        
                                        ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                                        google.com.             300     IN      A       172.217.3.174
                                        
                                        ;; Query time: 22 msec
                                        ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.1#53(192.168.1.1)
                                        ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 15 14:12:06 PDT 2017
                                        ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
                                        
                                        root@ubuntu-vpn:~# dig -6 google.com
                                        
                                        ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> -6 google.com
                                        ;; global options: +cmd
                                        ;; Got answer:
                                        ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11834
                                        ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
                                        
                                        ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
                                        ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
                                        ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                        ;google.com.                    IN      A
                                        
                                        ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                                        google.com.             288     IN      A       172.217.3.174
                                        
                                        ;; Query time: 1 msec
                                        ;; SERVER: 2001:a:b:d800:215:5dff:fe5c:e21e#53(2001:a:b:d800:215:5dff:fe5c:e21e)
                                        ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 15 14:12:19 PDT 2017
                                        ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
                                        
                                        root@ubuntu-vpn:~# traceroute -4 google.com
                                        
                                        traceroute to google.com (172.217.3.174), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
                                         1  pfSense.localdomain (192.168.1.1)  0.773 ms  0.748 ms  0.736 ms
                                         2  10.31.238.1 (10.31.238.1)  8.891 ms  9.802 ms  10.566 ms
                                         3  ae0.100.STTLWAWBGR80.bb.telus.com (154.11.10.9)  10.924 ms 154.11.10.11 (154.11.10.11)  9.769 ms  10.162 ms
                                         4  72.14.220.60 (72.14.220.60)  10.439 ms  10.836 ms  10.823 ms
                                         5  108.170.245.97 (108.170.245.97)  11.669 ms 108.170.245.113 (108.170.245.113)  11.465 ms  11.454 ms
                                         6  108.170.233.159 (108.170.233.159)  11.246 ms 108.170.233.157 (108.170.233.157)  9.978 ms 108.170.233.159 (108.170.233.159)  9.959 ms
                                         7  sea15s11-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.3.174)  10.232 ms  8.457 ms  9.346 ms
                                        
                                        root@ubuntu-vpn:~# traceroute -6 google.com
                                        
                                        traceroute to google.com (2607:f8b0:400a:808::200e), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
                                        connect: Network is unreachable
                                        
                                        root@ubuntu-vpn:~# ping -c 3 google.com
                                        
                                        PING google.com (172.217.3.174) 56(84) bytes of data.
                                        64 bytes from sea15s11-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.3.174): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=9.84 ms
                                        64 bytes from sea15s11-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.3.174): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=9.75 ms
                                        64 bytes from sea15s11-in-f174.1e100.net (172.217.3.174): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=9.11 ms
                                        
                                        --- google.com ping statistics ---
                                        3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2168ms
                                        rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.112/9.569/9.847/0.345 ms
                                        
                                        root@ubuntu-vpn:~# ping6 -c 3 google.com
                                        
                                        connect: Network is unreachable
                                        
                                        

                                        This was working before. No idea what's causing it other than pfsense.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • B
                                          bimmerdriver
                                          last edited by

                                          Wasn't sure why the results were different on windows and linux so flushed dns on windows. Now dig -6 gives the same result, fail.

                                          Something is causing dns6 to not work.

                                          C:\Users\User>ipconfig /flushdns
                                          
                                          Windows IP Configuration
                                          
                                          Successfully flushed the DNS Resolver Cache.
                                          
                                          C:\Users\User>Downloads\BIND9.10.5.x64\dig -6 google.com
                                          
                                          ; <<>> DiG 9.10.5 <<>> -6 google.com
                                          ;; global options: +cmd
                                          ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
                                          
                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • B
                                            bimmerdriver
                                            last edited by

                                            Same result when I flushed the dns on the linux server.

                                            root@ubuntu-vpn:~# /etc/init.d/networking force-reload
                                            [ ok ] Reloading networking configuration (via systemctl): networking.service.
                                            root@ubuntu-vpn:~# dig -6 google.com
                                            
                                            ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> -6 google.com
                                            ;; global options: +cmd
                                            ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
                                            root@ubuntu-vpn:~# dig -4 google.com
                                            
                                            ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> -4 google.com
                                            ;; global options: +cmd
                                            ;; Got answer:
                                            ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10260
                                            ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
                                            
                                            ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
                                            ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
                                            ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                                            ;google.com.                    IN      A
                                            
                                            ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                                            google.com.             300     IN      A       172.217.3.174
                                            
                                            ;; Query time: 545 msec
                                            ;; SERVER: 192.168.1.1#53(192.168.1.1)
                                            ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 15 16:12:06 PDT 2017
                                            ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55
                                            
                                            
                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.