Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Best solution for ip Cameras

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    13 Posts 5 Posters 1.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @banosr
      last edited by johnpoz

      @banosr While sure you can send your camera feeds over the wire to some other site.. But 20 feeds with constant record is going to add up to some bandwidth.. Depending on what resolution your recording.

      But If I call up the 3 feeds all at once, in 4k mode and only at 15fps.. Maybe your only like 720 and the streams use much less bandwidth?

      download.jpg

      Lets call it 10Mbps each, time 20 cameras - your looking at 200Mbps.. That is over half of your site 2 bandwidth.. Is that something you want to do?

      And then site 3 15 would be 150mbps that is like 1/2 of your upload there..

      Now your main site would have 350 coming in.. Like half of your 750mbps..

      I would want the NVRs to be local to where the cameras are - and sure if you want to view a feed or keep an eye on them and display the video, but at a lower res, etc. at your site 1..

      I mean it can be done sure - but I don't think I would do it.. Also so what if your connection is down, now you have no video of what went on..

      I would put in NVRs at the site(s) where the cameras actually exist to be honest. And then put them on a network that doesn't flow over your normal network.. Mine cameras are all on a isolated vlan behind the NVR.. So unless I am actually viewing something on my pc remote or tv other device.. That traffic is just between the cameras and the nvr - my other other networks never see that traffic go over the same wires as their traffic.

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • B
        banosr @johnpoz
        last edited by

        @johnpoz I know the bandwidth requirements, The internet in each location is devoted to the cameras and I also have DVRs in each location. The main site is a showroom to demo the cameras to potential clients and I am not streaming 24/7.

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @banosr
          last edited by

          @banosr well then its as simple as just using a vpn, shoot you don't even have to use a vpn to be honest, something as simple as gre tunnel could be used. I mean your not worried about securing the traffic?

          What vpn you choose could be ipsec, could be openvpn, could be wireguard, tailscale..

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            banosr @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz That much I had gathered I just need a recommendation as to what hardware to use in each site to create the tunnels

            Dobby_D johnpozJ P 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Dobby_D
              Dobby_ @banosr
              last edited by

              @banosr

              In each location a good NAS as a video surveillance for recording and
              then VPN from the main office (central) to the branch offices for getting
              in touch with the video files or plain being able to watch them over.

              So you don´t waste the throughput for the video upload, but if you want or
              must watch them you can easily connect.

              It is like we have realized it.

              #~. @Dobby

              Turris Omnia - 4 Ports - 2 GB RAM / TurrisOS 7 Release (Btrfs)
              PC Engines APU4D4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense CE 2.7.2 Release (ZFS)
              PC Engines APU6B4 - 4 Ports - 4 GB RAM / pfSense+ (Plus) 24.03_1 Release (ZFS)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @banosr
                last edited by

                @banosr said in Best solution for ip Cameras:

                what hardware to use in each site to create the tunnels

                Pretty much anything.. Like I said doesn't have even be a vpn tunnel - could be simple gre tunnel.. Which wouldn't have the overhead that vpns have - which would allow you to use smaller boxes.

                So you have any concern that the traffic would be intercepted and viewed? I mean someone would have to be in your path.. Like some router in the middle saying oh look someone is passing video inside a tunnel - lets intercept it and watch it ;)

                What do you have at the sites now?

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  banosr @johnpoz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz Just isp modems and a Velop Router at one site. I had ddns in the routers and port forwarding but in this nvr I am unable to use ddns.

                  johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    Patch @banosr
                    last edited by

                    @banosr said in Best solution for ip Cameras:

                    I just need a recommendation as to what hardware to use in each site to create the tunnels

                    Many users with video security cameras want the ability to remotely view what is being recorded, a function supported my most such systems.

                    If you also want that functionality and have a network video recorder at each site, then why connect the sites at all? Just use the remote access from each built in.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @banosr
                      last edited by

                      @banosr get some proper sized netgate appliances for your bandwidth.. 2100 should prob work for the remote sites.. But prob want something bigger at the site 1.. If your talking ipsec vpn the 2100 should be able to do your bandwidth, then get a 4200 for your site one.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        banosr @johnpoz
                        last edited by

                        @johnpoz Thanks, that's all I needed to know

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.