Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DIOCADDRULENV Error

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    27 Posts 3 Posters 1.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      @hypnosis4u2nv said in DIOCADDRULENV Error:

      May 29 10:35:43 miniupnpd 94484 ioctl(dev, DIOCCHANGERULE, ...) PF_CHANGE_ADD_TAIL: File exists

      Are you running the update miniupnpd pkg?

      How are you disabling Snort?
      Yes, running both Snort and Suricata is not supported.

      H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
        last edited by hypnosis4u2nv

        @stephenw10 Not sure what miniupnpd pkg I'm running, For now I uninstalled the Snort package.

        H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          There is an updated miniupnpd pkg available in 24.03. If you run pkg upgrade you will see it offered. It addresses this: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15470

          H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            hypnosis4u2nv @hypnosis4u2nv
            last edited by

            @hypnosis4u2nv updated. Will follow up to see if this error reappears. Thanks!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • H
              hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 Update didnt work.

              There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULENV: No such file or directory - The line in question reads [0]: @ 2024-05-30 12:21:03
              There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULENV: No such file or directory - The line in question reads [0]: @ 2024-05-30 12:21:05
              There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULENV: No such file or directory - The line in question reads [0]: @ 2024-05-30 12:40:07
              
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                @hypnosis4u2nv said in DIOCADDRULENV Error:

                May 29 10:35:44 miniupnpd 94484 ioctl(dev, DIOCCHANGERULE, ...) PF_CHANGE_ADD_TAIL: File exists

                But you're not seeing the errors from miniupnpd?:
                May 29 10:35:44 miniupnpd 94484 ioctl(dev, DIOCCHANGERULE, ...) PF_CHANGE_ADD_TAIL: File exists

                H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H
                  hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 Errors still exist in the miniupnpd

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Hmm, and those errors occur at the same time I assume?

                    And still nothing else logged at that time? No even triggering this?

                    H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H
                      hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 The miniupnpd errors are running constantly although they don't trip error logs, just in the routing logs.

                      The other DIOCADDRULENV error triggers an error and it seems to fluctuate when it does.

                      stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @hypnosis4u2nv
                        last edited by

                        @hypnosis4u2nv said in DIOCADDRULENV Error:

                        The miniupnpd errors are running constantly

                        Ah, well that's an issue!

                        Hmm, what does uname -a show? I wonder if it's somehow still running an old kernel.

                        H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • H
                          hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 FreeBSD pfSense.localdomain 15.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #0 plus-RELENG_24_03-n256311-e71f834dd81: Fri Apr 19 00:28:14 UTC 2024 root@freebsd:/var/jenkins/workspace/pfSense-Plus-snapshots-24_03-main/obj/amd64/Y4MAEJ2R/var/jenkins/workspace/pfSense-Plus-snapshots-24_03-main/sources/FreeBSD-src-plus-RELENG_24_03/amd64.amd64/sys/pfSense amd64

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            Konstanti @hypnosis4u2nv
                            last edited by Konstanti

                            @hypnosis4u2nv

                            May 29 10:35:44 miniupnpd 94484 ioctl(dev, DIOCCHANGERULE, ...) PF_CHANGE_ADD_TAIL: File exists

                            Hi
                            I don't know if this will help or not
                            But, judging by the code in the kernel, this error (in fact, this is not even a global error) suggests that some program is trying to add a rule identical to the one that has already been loaded into the kernel .
                            in this way,in my opinion, this is not a system error, but an application that is trying to make changes to a certain ruleset

                            H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • H
                              hypnosis4u2nv @Konstanti
                              last edited by

                              @Konstanti conflict between pfblocker and suricata or my current rules conflicting with either of them?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                More like a UPnP application in some downstream client trying to open the same port forward repeatedly.

                                However I would have thought miniupnpd would know that and not try to open it. Some more useful error in that situation seems likely.

                                H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • H
                                  hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10 anyway to troubleshoot this?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Well first I'd try disabling upnp just be sure it stops.

                                    Then try blocking individual hosts from opening upnp forwards and see if that can be narrowed down to a single host opening conflicting ports. Though as I say I'd expect miniupnpd to see that the port is already open and just reject the request....

                                    H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • H
                                      hypnosis4u2nv @stephenw10
                                      last edited by

                                      @stephenw10 I'm away for a couple of days, I'll look into it when I get back. Thanks for your help.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.