Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Traffic Graph in 2.7.2 does not display description anymore? [resolved]

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    14 Posts 3 Posters 846 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Yup, I was just going to ask that. If you switched to Kea the hosts with existing leases would still be resolved but no new leases would be added.

      Try switching back to ISC DHCPD if so.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • xanaroX
        xanaro
        last edited by xanaro

        I believe I did switch to kea for a few minutes because of the deprecation warning that I seen in the dashboard.

        I then googled pfsense kea vs isc, and came to the conclusion that using kea was probably not a good idea for now and switched back to isc and checked the box to ignore deprecation warning. So kea was only on for a minute or two.

        I have rebooted pfsense and all the machines since switching back to isc but the problem persists. (I had no idea that kea could have been the cause)

        I may try another fresh 2.7.2 install and restore my XML config again, and make sure not to enable kea ever.

        When you have 100 hosts on your network and your watching the traffic graph to see who is using the most, the IP addresses are less helpful than a hostname or description. With only the IP address visible I have to go lookup who that is in the DHCP server, it is inconvenient to say the least.

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @xanaro
          last edited by

          @xanaro does the IP resolve if you just query unbound for the PTR? If not then no it wouldn't be able to show you the names. But a reinstall seems like a sledge hammer approach to be honest.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • xanaroX
            xanaro
            last edited by

            One of the hosts that actually does show a description or hostname, does appear to have a PTR record. However most do not and resolve to nobody.invalid:

            A good chunk of the hostnames are linux containers and VMs on proxmox, but there are also some workstations.

            As you can see the first host resolves a PTR, the second does not, nearly all IPs are resolving to nobody.invalid.

            2024-06-07_12-01-23.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • xanaroX
              xanaro
              last edited by xanaro

              I just figured it out! I noticed that the only two returning a PTR were the ones that I had some records set directly for in the unbound DNS resolver custom options box.

              so I started looking that page over and noticed two unchecked boxes, once checked it all went back to working, thanks a ton @johnpoz

              2024-06-07_12-12-59.png

              johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @xanaro
                last edited by

                @xanaro registering dhcp can be problematic because every dhcp event will cause a restart of unbound... if you have your devices set with reservations - just load those, and not on every dhcp registration.

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • xanaroX
                  xanaro
                  last edited by

                  Thanks, I just unchecked the DHCP Registration, 95% of my hosts do have static entries.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    If you have less than, say, 25 hosts it's not really an issue. Likely more than that.

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 would depend on the lease time how many clients in sync with their renewals how long unbound taking to restart..

                      If your lease is long and only a few clients, unbound restarts how it should in like 2 seconds yeah prob never notice..

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        True. I guess I should specify, when using the default values or DHCP. 😉

                        My test setup has more hosts than that and is served by a 3100. I never see any DNS issues.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.