Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DoH list

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    20 Posts 5 Posters 1.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GertjanG
      Gertjan @JonathanLee
      last edited by

      @JonathanLee

      Firewall > pfBlockerNG > DNSBL > DNSBL SafeSearch ?

      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
      Edit : and where are the logs ??

      JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jrey @JonathanLee
        last edited by

        @JonathanLee

        Not prepared to give away all the tricks but my graylog - realtime DNSBL logging is showing a few records from your list - I won't have a clear set of numbers until there is more activity Monday to Friday..

        your list is the "orange" section on the pie
        Screen Shot 2024-08-17 at 8.35.39 AM.png

        Screen Shot 2024-08-17 at 8.36.14 AM.png

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • D
          darcey @JonathanLee
          last edited by

          @JonathanLee My approach to blocking DoH has been to use IP blocking rather than DNSBL. I'd be interested in knowing the pros & cons of each. It hadn't occurred to me to do it via DNSBL.

          J JonathanLeeJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • J
            jrey @darcey
            last edited by

            @darcey said in DoH list:

            I'd be interested in knowing the pros & cons of each

            Too soon to say, but in theory, the names they encode are pretty static, the IP's they point those name to can change in a heart beat... so ....

            The best approach for those interested in blocking this, might actually be a combo of both.

            Traffic is lower here on a Saturday, so far I haven't noticed a significant shift of blocking from my IP list to @JonathanLee name list. Graylog will tell me if/when it does.
            It's also possible the shift may be small if the names are already in another list.. Again once I have a larger volume of data in Graylog I'll be able to match the list by names blocked and see

            from Graylog the DNSBL_DoHName is Jonathan's list
            Screen Shot 2024-08-17 at 11.09.59 AM.png

            Each to their own.

            JonathanLeeJ D M 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • JonathanLeeJ
              JonathanLee @Gertjan
              last edited by

              @Gertjan do you possibly have the URL or text file that is used, this list is massive compared to mine, again a lot of mine was manually done and a lot added on from other lists.

              Make sure to upvote

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JonathanLeeJ
                JonathanLee @jrey
                last edited by JonathanLee

                @jrey so you are getting hits from mine. That token one came from a blacklist doh category. I thought it would have been some mask.apple-dns.net one they are really pushing this one right now manual set dns or not. I have a regex for it they seem to make a new one every couple months

                Make sure to upvote

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JonathanLeeJ
                  JonathanLee
                  last edited by JonathanLee

                  Researched and found this..

                  No longer working:
                  https://heuristicsecurity.com/dohservers.txt
                  https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bambenek/block-doh/master/doh-hosts.txt
                  https://raw.githubusercontent.com/oneoffdallas/dohservers/master/list.txt

                  Still active:

                  You can also block all public DNS IPs with this feed:
                  https://public-dns.info/nameservers.txt

                  https://github.com/dibdot/DoH-IP-blocklists/blob/master/doh-domains.txt

                  Make sure to upvote

                  J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • D
                    darcey @jrey
                    last edited by darcey

                    @jrey said in DoH list:

                    The best approach for those interested in blocking this, might actually be a combo of both.

                    I guess it depends how applications, that make use of DoH, determine DoH server IP. I'd completely overlooked the fact that some|most might arrive at this via a regular DNS query. If that is the case for all apps using DoH, then it would seem DNSBL is an appropriate way to block.
                    AIUI some of the DoH IPs serve stuff other than DoH. The pihole discourse cdn is one case, I believe!
                    But I suppose there are applications discovering a DoH server IP in ways other than a regular DNS lookup.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      jrey @JonathanLee
                      last edited by

                      @JonathanLee

                      I wonder if the mask.apple.... is blocked without logging because it is already on this list

                      pfBlockerNG -> DNSBL -> DNSBL SafeSearch

                      Screen Shot 2024-08-17 at 3.26.04 PM.png

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JonathanLeeJ
                        JonathanLee
                        last edited by

                        Unbound Resolver can also be configured to use DoH, it works with advanced config. Again would other DoH requests still get around it? Again I wonder about a snort ips/ids signature to see any DoH request. I don’t think it is possible

                        Make sure to upvote

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jrey @jrey
                          last edited by

                          @JonathanLee

                          Sure enough
                          I unselected it from the list above, reload the DNSBL then dig it
                          shows up logged from your list ..

                          Screen Shot 2024-08-17 at 3.34.56 PM.png

                          difference is when on the DNSBL Safesearch above and you dig (not logged in DNSBL, is logged in dnsreply )
                          because you get NXDOMAiN

                          ;; global options: +cmd
                          ;; Got answer:
                          ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 58941
                          ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
                          
                          ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
                          ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1432
                          ;; QUESTION SECTION:
                          ;mask.apple-dns.net.		IN	A
                          

                          When it is not on the list above it falls to your list, is logged and returns

                          
                          ;; ANSWER SECTION:
                          mask.apple-dns.net.	60	IN	A	10.10.10.1
                          

                          That being the case the place to put this might be better in the SafeSearch above and not a special DNSBL blocking -- Clearly the NXDOMAIN interception point before user defined DNSBL lists, would cause the (application/website) whatever to not try and get a response from 10.10.10.1 ?

                          Since the only one from your list that has been logged here is token.safebr.. I might like to confirm next that it is actually DoH traffic going to/from there? Have you?

                          guess I'll have to look at pulling realtime dnsreply logs in to graylog so I can make another pretty graph lol -

                          JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • M
                            michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @jrey
                            last edited by

                            @jrey what GROK patterns are you using for dnsbl?

                            Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                            Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                            Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                            Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                            JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • J
                              jrey @michmoor
                              last edited by

                              @michmoor

                              umm, you can write your own you know..

                              funny, and there I though the first question someone would ask would be more like wait minute -- DNSBL records to syslog in realtime..

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • JonathanLeeJ
                                JonathanLee @darcey
                                last edited by

                                @darcey some I have found if you block the DoH FQDN start to use an IP address as if it had been coded as a if else statement, so you have to at times block the IP and the FQDN. I don’t understand if an administrator sets the DNS to a firewall and all the sudden a device starts to attempt DoH and bypass admin settings. It’s like wack a mole.

                                Make sure to upvote

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JonathanLeeJ
                                  JonathanLee @jrey
                                  last edited by JonathanLee

                                  @jrey the url comes from a blacklist in France, they have had it listed as DoH for years. I have never seen it not blocked on my system. I have never had issues with it being blocked. It would be so simple if there was a standard ips/ids signature for DoH that it could just AppID block, all DoH signatures must act in the same way per protocol design right? I mean it’s not just Apple creating new ones every couple days it’s a list that grows and grows, if we had a simple DoH Snort detection signature all of this could be solved with much less cycles.

                                  https://docs.snort.org/start/rules

                                  There is something we can use to detect DoH use, that way it could be blocked with inline or legacy blocking mode

                                  Make sure to upvote

                                  GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • GertjanG
                                    Gertjan @JonathanLee
                                    last edited by

                                    @JonathanLee said in DoH list:

                                    There is something we can use to detect DoH use

                                    DoH is a TLS data stream going a some destination IP using port 443.

                                    Just by looking at the random bit stream, the size of entire stream open - data exchange and stream end, you might be able to say : hey, that's not a classic web page, but something way smaller like a DNS request. But how to be sure ?

                                    DoH server are special, and by nature their IP addresses are semi static or 'always the same', so they can't hide for long time, they will get known. If you're not sure, throw a DoH DNS request on it, and you'll be sure its a DNS server, as a web server will say 'sorry, error'.

                                    To block DoH the explicit way, there is only one solution : go MITM.

                                    No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                                    Edit : and where are the logs ??

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.