Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    RAMdisk or not?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    18 Posts 9 Posters 2.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      ViciousXUSMC @bmeeks
      last edited by

      @bmeeks I know this is old, and I am necro posting but what about someone with a build like mine that has 32GB of RAM and never even use close to half of it?

      But I also run two half way decent SSD as the OS disk in Raid 1 so loss of a disk sucks but atleast is not catastrphic.

      But unused RAM is waisted RAM I could easily give 16GB of RAM to the RAM disk.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stephenw10S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by

        Probably fine.

        However consider that the percentage of all systems running ram disks is low. That means that any config combination that includes running in a ram disk is far less tested than without ram disks. So you are more likely to find bugs there. Of course finding bugs is helpful so... 😉

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • provelsP
          provels
          last edited by

          I used to use the ramdisk, but I found it annoying to be forced to update pfB manually because the pfB list downloads were lost anytime I rebooted (especially as a VM running on a Windows host, hence the reboots).

          Peder

          MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
          BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stephenw10S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by

            Mmm, pretty sure that has been fixed in pfB. I run both and don't hit that. The only time we might expect that is the first boot after restoring a config.

            provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • provelsP
              provels @stephenw10
              last edited by provels

              @stephenw10 Don't think so.
              I just changed to ramdisks, rebooted, directories empty (expected).
              Ran update reload/all, populated the lists.
              Rebooted again, empty again.
              The ramdisk backup schedule backs up /var/log, but not/var/db.
              Running 3.2.0_10 (release). Am I wrong? No big deal for me either way, my FW is so overpowered.
              ba2582c5-0f62-4e88-aab1-bea0cc3fb9b8-image.png

              fc27b55b-eba9-45f1-95ac-8be99a8ea2f0-image.png

              Peder

              MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
              BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                It should be backed up here as far as I can see:
                https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/blob/devel/net/pfSense-pkg-pfBlockerNG/files/usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc#L4696

                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jrey @provels
                  last edited by

                  @provels said in RAMdisk or not?:

                  I found it annoying to be forced to update pfB manually because the pfB list downloads were lost anytime I rebooted

                  Just for clarification, when you say rebuild are you talking the DNSBL after a reboot is showing it starts in a down state? effectively then saying that the list is out of sync?
                  or are you simply concerned that the files in the various sub directories are gone (even though they are not needed for a restart of the DNSBL or rules (alias) for that matter).

                  Use ramdisk all the time -- (both on the test VM that reboots a lot, because I shut it down normally when I'm not testing something) and the production box, which almost never restarts.

                  Have not seen an issue with the DNSBL starting in a "down" state.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jrey @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10

                    Correct -- but I think the fact the .orig files are not there after a reboot is perhaps provels concern ?

                    They don't need to be there for DNSBL or alias lists (rules) to restore -- they are all considered transitional files - only items saved are the "active / final" bits to bring it back up to the state it was in before being shutdown.

                    Take a running system (delete all the .orig files, for example) nothing bad happens. It certainly doesn't impact the running DNSBL or firewall rules that are currently running based on anything in those directories. Then the files just get replaced next time the cron process runs and updates.

                    Not broken, IMHO.
                    side effect of running ramdisks (maybe a slight impact when cron runs to obtain the updates) but it is likely going to do that anyway in most cases (even if the files are already there) impact is minimal

                    Now if the DNSBL (for example is starting in a bad state (out of sync for example) and provels is having to rebuild because of that, it is a completely different issue,
                    but again it just seem that perhaps having no .orig files after a reboot, based on the screen capture, is the concern here

                    You will notice in the code you reference that it backs up unbound and the alias "stuff" (that's all it needs to archive) (effectively the running state) the rest is temporary fluff.

                    I run ramdisk both on a VM test box restarts frequently
                    and on production NetGate box, never been an issue with "lost" lists (alias) or DNSBL after a reboot.

                    provelsP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • provelsP
                      provels @jrey
                      last edited by provels

                      @jrey @stephenw10
                      OK, I guess you're right. Here's some screenclips. I know I used to see a warning on the Dashboard widget on the DNSBL, and not that long ago. Why I went back to disk rather than RAM.

                      3b72f842-aa86-4f5a-9f96-cb6a9af41f46-image.png

                      On reboot the files get cleared from directories below /var/db/pfblockerng.
                      Before:
                      0a2b1eed-36f6-44ed-b07e-727824ca60f9-image.png

                      After: (ignore Shallalist)
                      ad227271-197f-4460-9e87-8661e47867b8-image.png
                      a8fe51de-6fb3-4a53-a172-2bafd6933de2-image.png

                      The only file I see related to pfB is this. Is this the aggregated list that pfB uses/backs up/restores at reboot to keep it working? (14K+ lines)
                      142828b4-feee-46b6-95ff-672422a26a49-image.png

                      Can you tell me where these lists exist after reboot if they're not in the db directory?
                      d038a1d4-8f13-4ca5-95b6-9cebe742d55d-image.png

                      Thanks, gang.

                      Peder

                      MAIN - pfSense+ 24.11-RELEASE - Adlink MXE-5401, i7, 16 GB RAM, 64 GB SSD. 500 GB HDD for SyslogNG
                      BACKUP - pfSense+ 23.01-RELEASE - Hyper-V Virtual Machine, Gen 1, 2 v-CPUs, 3 GB RAM, 8GB VHDX (Dynamic)

                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • S
                        slu @pfguy2018
                        last edited by

                        @pfguy2018 said in RAMdisk or not?:

                        pfBlockerNG

                        In this case, please have a look into my topic:
                        https://forum.netgate.com/topic/189820/how-do-i-find-out-what-write-continuously-on-my-pfsense-ssd

                        Also using Snort, but my system has enough RAM (16 GB) to have a large RAM disk...

                        pfSense Gold subscription

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jrey @provels
                          last edited by

                          @provels said in RAMdisk or not?:

                          Can you tell me where these lists exist after reboot if they're not in the db directory?

                          the DNSBL you've highlight are with unbound.

                          @jrey said in RAMdisk or not?:

                          it backs up unbound

                          that is what is "providing" the DNSBL function

                          -- pfB just aggregates sources of data to build lists(alias) then used by unbound or rules. The data pfB uses is just the "step" between in that process of getting from source and using in DNSBL/firewall.

                          Source (Download) -> Originals (raw as provided by source) -> (Process to) (Deny, Match, Native, Permit etc) -> (provide to) DNSBL(unbound) OR (alias firewall)

                          (process to) = options like de-duplication, CIDR Aggregation etc -- not all options you've selected apply to all Originals. (check the info blocks, usually provided with each option to determine what happens for a given option)

                          so for example in the IP settings De-Duplication -- "Only used for IPv4 Deny Lists"

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • J
                            juliaadams43462
                            last edited by juliaadams43462

                            This post is deleted!
                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.