Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Proxmox: WAN NIC passthrough issue with 2.5G connection to fiber router

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    23 Posts 3 Posters 1.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Seeing broadcast ARPs from other customers is only an indication of a poor setup at the ISP IMO. It should not affect your connectivity unless maybe here is a conflicting MAC address or IP. But pfSense would log that and complain loudly if there were.

      You said it stops after ~2000 pings so I assumed you were running a ping test from somewhere against something?

      We have seen similar reports of ISP gateways losing ARP entries and instead of ARPing to renew it just dropping traffic which does sound similar. However it normally comes back after some time in those situations. Are you seeing that?

      A workaround for that is to set the pfSense ARP renewal time much shorter so it keeps the upstream device current. To test that run at the command line:
      sysctl net.link.ether.inet.max_age=300

      L 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        whosmatt @lp.descamps
        last edited by

        @lp-descamps said in Proxmox: WAN NIC passthrough issue with 2.5G connection to fiber router:

        Has anyone encountered a similar issue with Intel I225-V NICs or passthrough configurations?

        I have encountered similar behavior with multiple I225 class NICs, yes. No passthrough in my case. The only thing that showed up in the pfSense logs was repeating entries like:

        kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for <wan gateway ip > on igc0
        

        Like you, simply "reconfiguring" the interface without any changes would bring back the connection until next time it happened.

        I had this problem with 3 different igc NICs, including one OEM Intel part and two cheap chinese parts.

        I eventually gave up on igc and got a different NIC, in my case an X710-T4L.

        L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          lp.descamps @whosmatt
          last edited by

          @whosmatt said in Proxmox: WAN NIC passthrough issue with 2.5G connection to fiber router:

          arpresolve

          I do get this error too
          kernel arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 192.168.1.1 on igc0

          but I don't use 192.168.1.0 network on pfsense?!?

          thanks

          stephenw10S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            lp.descamps @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10

            i m pinging from a laptop to 1.1.1.1

            I ve now enable the gw monitoring to ping 8.8.8.8 instead of ISP gw. will how it goes

            the internet connection works again after the lease time of the arp expires and disappears from the table and I m back with 2 arp entries from the isp. the gw IP and wan interface

            I will try sysctl net.link.ether.inet.max_age=300 if the gw monitoring didn't do the trick. what is the default value for max_age in case I want to roll this back?

            thanks

            L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • L
              lp.descamps @lp.descamps
              last edited by

              @lp-descamps
              lost internet again

              changed the sysctl net.link.ether.inet.max_age from 1200 to 300

              I didn't get kernel arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 192.168.1.1 on igc0 errors this time

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator @lp.descamps
                last edited by

                @lp-descamps said in Proxmox: WAN NIC passthrough issue with 2.5G connection to fiber router:

                but I don't use 192.168.1.0 network on pfsense?!?

                Might be a clue there though. Your WAN is DHCP I'm assuming? Perhaps something else is giving it a lease with that IP as the gateway.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • L
                  lp.descamps @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10
                  there is a conflicting MAC

                  when internet is working I can see this in arp table,

                  WAN	100.68.0.1	42:9e:a4:3c:8e:2b		Expires in 1156 seconds	ethernet	  
                  WAN	100.69.245.16	7c:83:34:bd:4b:21		Permanent	        ethernet
                  

                  when internet breaks, I get this

                  WAN	100.68.0.64	42:9e:a4:3c:8e:2b		Expires in 1186 seconds	ethernet	  
                  WAN	100.68.0.32	42:9e:a4:3c:8e:2b		Expires in 1186 seconds	ethernet	  
                  WAN	100.68.0.65	42:9e:a4:3c:8e:2b		Expires in 1186 seconds	ethernet	  
                  WAN	100.69.245.16	7c:83:34:bd:4b:21		Permanent	ethernet	  
                  WAN	100.68.0.69	42:9e:a4:3c:8e:2b		Expires in 1186 seconds	ethernet	  
                  WAN	100.68.0.31	42:9e:a4:3c:8e:2b		Expires in 1186 seconds	ethernet	   
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    Which of those, if any, is the WAN gateway? If it is it's a long way from the WAN IP or a huge subnet.

                    That doesn't look like it's necessarily a conflict though. One MAC address could be associated with all those IPs.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • L
                      lp.descamps @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10
                      the wan gw is 100.68.0.1 42:9e:a4:3c:8e:2b
                      i can see it in the arp table before and after I lose internet
                      but sometimes I get incomplete instead of MAC

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Hmm, if it shows 'incomplete' then it's unable to get the gateway MAC which implies a layer2 failure.

                        Where is the gateway in this case? Remote, at the ISP?

                        It does seem like you might be hitting an issue with the NIC though.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • L
                          lp.descamps @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10
                          i believe the gw is remotely at the isp.
                          all I have at home is a fiber box that seems unmanaged
                          is there a way to set static arp?
                          how would I validate a hw nic failure?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            I've yet to see the i225 disconnect issues that are relatively well known but as I understand it they usually show as the NIC losing link which I don't think you're seeing?

                            I would run a pcap on it in the failed state and see if it's actually passing packets at all.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • L
                              lp.descamps @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 that s one of the capture packetcapture-igc0-20241212183144.pcap

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                Hmm, so no incoming traffic at all.

                                Have you tried running it as not pass-through so pfSense just sees it as vtnet?

                                L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • L
                                  lp.descamps @stephenw10
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10 i was non-passthrough and had issues hence moving to passthrough

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    What sort of issues? Similar connection failures?

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • L
                                      lp.descamps @stephenw10
                                      last edited by

                                      @stephenw10 yes, loss of internet

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stephenw10S
                                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                        last edited by

                                        Hmm, that does start to look like a NIC issue then if it fails the same way with the Linux driver.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.