Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Crash Report after runing traceroute

    General pfSense Questions
    4
    22
    496
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      studeoQ @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 said in Crash Report after runing traceroute:

      Looks like it's re1 giving the issue. Is that assigned as WAN?

      re1 is currently the LAN link - but it might have been WAN when this happened.
      I'll test and report back.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • S
        studeoQ @stephenw10
        last edited by studeoQ

        @stephenw10
        WAN - traceroute -i re0 8.8.8.8 - crash on the first hop
        LAN - traceroute -i re1 8.8.8.8 - crash on the first hop

        traceroute -1 re0 192.168.1.11 - crash on the first hop
        traceroute -1 re0 192.168.1.11 - went 6 hops without crashing - but discovered zero routes to a machine sitting on the LAN.

        traceroute to 192.168.1.11 (192.168.1.11), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
         1  * * *
         2  * * *
         3  * * *
         4  * * *
         5  * * *
         6  * *^C
        

        traceroute from GUI - crash - presumably on the first hop

        The system is now inline and in production with basic WAN/LAN ip assignments.
        M

        K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          Konstanti @studeoQ
          last edited by Konstanti

          @studeoQ

          Hi
          what kind of driver are you using?
          The site says only about support for Windows

          https://www.trendnet.com/support/TEG-25GECTX

          c530a20f-07b2-4ac1-9226-3ce2fb625a7b-image.png

          bbca8201-cf24-451f-b6d0-5c9a007b922b-image.png

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            studeoQ @Konstanti
            last edited by

            @Konstanti
            I'm using the updated drivers described here.
            The rest of the system seems stable - VLANS working, etc...

            K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              Konstanti @studeoQ
              last edited by

              @studeoQ

              The re driver supports RealTek RTL8139C+, RTL8169, RTL816xS, RTL811xS, RTL8168,RTL810xE and RTL8111 based Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet adapters

              Your adapter is not on this list (I suspect the problem is with the device driver)

              device = 'RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller'

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                studeoQ @Konstanti
                last edited by

                @Konstanti
                The behavior is the same with both NICS - which of course happen to both be Realtek.
                Live and learn I guess.
                If I end up building another box - I'll keep an eye out for it in the future.
                M

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  The in kernel re driver doesn't support rtl8125 but the alternative kmod driver does.

                  @studeoQ said in Crash Report after runing traceroute:

                  traceroute -1 re0 192.168.1.11 - crash on the first hop
                  traceroute -1 re0 192.168.1.11 - went 6 hops without crashing - but discovered zero routes to a machine sitting on the LAN.

                  I assume one of those is a typo? And I expect the second test there should show re1 because testing to the LAN from the LAN IP removes re0 from the route. That would confirm it's actually the re0 driver causing a problem. In which case you could try going back to the in-kernel driver but that will stop the 2.5G NIC working.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    studeoQ @stephenw10
                    last edited by

                    @stephenw10
                    Yes - a typo - and I couldn't edit - too much time had passed.
                    Right now - the "fix" is - don't run traceroute...
                    Everything else is working as expected - so tempted to leave it alone for now.

                    GertjanG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • GertjanG
                      Gertjan @studeoQ
                      last edited by

                      @studeoQ said in Crash Report after runing traceroute:

                      Everything else is working as expected - so tempted to leave it alone for now.

                      Your initial plan was the best, as 're' will come back to bite you :

                      @studeoQ said in Crash Report after runing traceroute:

                      If I end up building another box

                      No need to rebuild, go visit the BIOS and do what all 're' merits : disable them.
                      Then slide in a dual (quad ?) intel NIC, and you'll be good.

                      No "help me" PM's please. Use the forum, the community will thank you.
                      Edit : and where are the logs ??

                      K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        Konstanti @Gertjan
                        last edited by

                        @Gertjan

                        Here, perhaps, I agree.
                        It is unknown from which source code this driver is built and for which version of Freebsd. If there are already problems that lead to a system failure , then it is better to abandon this idea. With Intel network cards, everything has been functioning for years without problems

                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          studeoQ @Konstanti
                          last edited by

                          @Konstanti
                          It's a limitation of the box I built - SFF PC with no real ability to add very many options (single PCIe 1X slot) so - finding the right NIC might be the next and only option. If not - then a new box will be in order. I was pretty impatient when it came to building the first one. I'll be more careful in the future.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Do you see any issues if you run a traceroute from a client behind pfSense through it?

                            S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              studeoQ @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10
                              Other than being a little slower than i think is normal - no - there aren't any obvious issues.
                              It can be run from nodes residing behind it.
                              I seriously doubt I would be running it on the device for any reason other than testing.
                              I just thought a system-wide failure was a little odd.

                              If anyone knows of a PCIe X1 dual NIC that might fit the bill - I'm all ears.
                              Speed tests are normal and I'm getting the expected symmetrical speeds - so it can't be "that broken".
                              But - I'm not a big fan of loose ends and known broken stuff just lingering around - so - I'd feel better knowing it wasn't an issue.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                studeoQ @stephenw10
                                last edited by

                                @stephenw10
                                I took another look - and I have an available X16 slot - PCIe 2 - so that opens things up a bit as far as selection.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • S
                                  studeoQ
                                  last edited by studeoQ

                                  So - I added an Intel Pro 1000 - 4 port 1G NIC - and all is well.
                                  Realtek disabled in the bios.
                                  Life is good.
                                  Lesson learned.
                                  All functions normal...

                                  Thanks to all who helped.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.