Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPsec site to site dropping every 49-55 minutes

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    44 Posts 4 Posters 1.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      TheStormsOfFury @andrew_cb
      last edited by

      @andrew_cb Thank you very much for the reply.

      Site A Phase 2 remote subnets
      P2-1:

      • Local Subnet: LAN Subnet (10.1.0.0/16
      • Remote Subnet: 10.2.0.0/16 (Site B LAN Subnet)
        P2-2:
      • Local Subnet: LAN Subnet (10.1.0.0/16)
      • Remote Subnet: 10.0.1.0/24 (for a road warrior open VPN connection at site B)

      Site B Phase 2 remote subnets
      P2-1

      • Local Subnet: LAN Subnet (10.2.0.0/16)
      • Remote Subnet 10.1.0.0/16 (Site A LAN Subnet)
        P2-2
      • Local Subnet: 10.0.1.0/24 (for a road warrior open VPN connection at site B)
      • Remote Subnet: 10.1.0.0/16 (Site A LAN Subnet)

      I thought I turned on "Make before break" last night, but I apparently was so tired I forgot to apply the changes and restart the VPN. I just did this now, show hopefully this might fix the issue; however, I am going to also implement your suggestion of the floating rule.

      In fact I'm looking at this now, but I do have a quick question about the config:

      Action => Block
      Interface ... Should this be WAN or IPsec?
      Direction => out
      Address Family => IPv4
      Protocol => Any
      Source ... should be WAN Address? I'm running HA so I have VIP, should it be the VIP Address? or should I do one for WAN and a separate for VIP?
      Destination ... I'm going to need 1 for both remote subnets on Site A and just the Site B subnet

      How close am I on this configuration?

      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        TheStormsOfFury @TheStormsOfFury
        last edited by

        Well, I was hoping the "Make before break" setting would have resulted this issue, yet at 58 minutes it trimmed out for about 45 seconds again.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          TheStormsOfFury @andrew_cb
          last edited by

          @andrew_cb Just looking at this again as I know there is a time difference, but shouldn't this be the configuration if we do not want the IPsec traffic to go out the WAN?

          Action => Block
          Interface => IPsec
          Direction => out
          Address Family => IPv4
          Protocol => Any
          Source => LAN
          Destination => WAN RTR1 / WAN RTR2 / VIP WAN

          Maybe i'm thinking about this wrong, but this would keep IPsec traffic from the lan going out over the wan, or am I wrong?

          PS, the system is still dropping for about 40-50 seconds every 55-ish minutes. I'm going to get the logs again shortly.

          T A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            TheStormsOfFury @TheStormsOfFury
            last edited by

            Here are the updated logs for the timeout session that just happened:

            I am wondering if i should change the ReKey on the Phase2 as it is happening at 55 minutes on a 60 expiration and a 3-4 minute random.

            I started getting ping timeouts at 14:59:02 and service return at 3:00:03

            Logs on Site A:

            Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> nothing to initiate
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 27 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL request 27 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> queueing IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> sending DPD request
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> nothing to initiate
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 26 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL request 26 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> queueing IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> sending DPD request
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> nothing to initiate
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 25 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	10[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	10[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL request 25 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> activating IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> queueing IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> sending DPD request
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> nothing to initiate
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 24 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL request 24 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> activating IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> queueing IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> sending DPD request
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> nothing to initiate
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 23 [ ]
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL request 23 [ ]
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> activating IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> queueing IKE_DPD task
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	81451	10[IKE] <con1|1> sending DPD request
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> nothing to initiate
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: DELETED => DESTROYING
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating CHILD_DELETE task
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> queueing CHILD_DELETE task
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> nothing to initiate
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: DELETING => DELETED
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> CHILD_SA closed
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> received DELETE for ESP CHILD_SA with SPI cfe718f6
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL response 22 [ D ]
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL request 22 [ D ]
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: REKEYED => DELETING
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> sending DELETE for ESP CHILD_SA with SPI cb24b68e
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> closing CHILD_SA con1{6} with SPIs cb24b68e_i (99971985 bytes) cfe718f6_o (135223892 bytes) and TS 10.1.0.0/16|/0 === 10.0.1.0/24|/0 10.2.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> CHILD_REKEY task
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> reinitiating already active tasks
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: REKEYING => REKEYED
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> outbound CHILD_SA con1{7} established with SPIs c0ed26f2_i c421f173_o and TS 10.1.0.0/16|/0 === 10.0.1.0/24|/0 10.2.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> SPI 0xc421f173, src 207.162.137.151 dst 75.61.85.193
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> adding outbound ESP SA
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{7} state change: INSTALLING => INSTALLED
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> inbound CHILD_SA con1{7} established with SPIs c0ed26f2_i c421f173_o and TS 10.1.0.0/16|/0 === 10.0.1.0/24|/0 10.2.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> SPI 0xc421f173, src 207.162.137.151 dst 75.61.85.193
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> registering outbound ESP SA
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> SPI 0xc0ed26f2, src 75.61.85.193 dst 207.162.137.151
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> adding inbound ESP SA
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> using HMAC_SHA2_256_128 for integrity
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> using AES_CBC for encryption
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{7} state change: CREATED => INSTALLING
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.0.1.0/24|/0, received: 10.0.1.0/24|/0 => match: 10.0.1.0/24|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.0.1.0/24|/0, received: 10.2.0.0/16|/0 => no match
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.2.0.0/16|/0, received: 10.0.1.0/24|/0 => no match
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.2.0.0/16|/0, received: 10.2.0.0/16|/0 => match: 10.2.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> selecting traffic selectors for other:
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.1.0.0/16|/0, received: 10.1.0.0/16|/0 => match: 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.1.0.0/16|/0, received: 10.1.0.0/16|/0 => match: 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> selecting traffic selectors for us:
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> selected proposal: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> proposal matches
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> selecting proposal:
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> received ESP_TFC_PADDING_NOT_SUPPORTED, not using ESPv3 TFC padding
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> received ESP_TFC_PADDING_NOT_SUPPORTED notify
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> parsed CREATE_CHILD_SA response 21 [ N(ESP_TFC_PAD_N) SA No KE TSi TSr ]
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (496 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (512 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[ENC] <con1|1> generating CREATE_CHILD_SA request 21 [ N(REKEY_SA) N(ESP_TFC_PAD_N) SA No KE TSi TSr ]
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: INSTALLED => REKEYING
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> establishing CHILD_SA con1{7} reqid 1
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> 10.0.1.0/24|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> 10.2.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> proposing traffic selectors for other:
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[CFG] <con1|1> proposing traffic selectors for us:
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating CHILD_REKEY task
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	09[IKE] <con1|1> queueing CHILD_REKEY task
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	81451	08[KNL] creating rekey job for CHILD_SA ESP/0xcfe718f6/75.61.85.193
Apr 9 14:58:06	charon	81451	08[CFG] vici client 3008 disconnected
Apr 9 14:58:06	charon	81451	09[CFG] vici client 3008 requests: list-sas
Apr 9 14:58:06	charon	81451	09[CFG] vici client 3008 registered for: list-sa
Apr 9 14:58:06	charon	81451	08[CFG] vici client 3008 connected
Apr 9 14:58:01	charon	81451	09[CFG] vici client 3007 disconnected
Apr 9 14:58:01	charon	81451	08[CFG] vici client 3007 requests: list-sas
Apr 9 14:58:01	charon	81451	08[CFG] vici client 3007 registered for: list-sa
Apr 9 14:58:01	charon	81451	08[CFG] vici client 3007 connected

            On Site B:

            Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	80312	13[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	80312	13[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL response 27 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	80312	13[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL request 27 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:33	charon	80312	13[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL response 26 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL request 26 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:23	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL response 25 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL request 25 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:13	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL response 24 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL request 24 [ ]
Apr 9 15:00:03	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL response 23 [ ]
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL request 23 [ ]
Apr 9 14:59:53	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> nothing to initiate
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: DELETED => DESTROYING
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> activating CHILD_DELETE task
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> activating new tasks
Apr 9 14:59:47	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> queueing CHILD_DELETE task
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> generating INFORMATIONAL response 22 [ D ]
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> outbound CHILD_SA con1{7} established with SPIs c421f173_i c0ed26f2_o and TS 10.0.1.0/24|/0 10.2.0.0/16|/0 === 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> SPI 0xc0ed26f2, src 75.61.85.193 dst 207.162.137.151
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> adding outbound ESP SA
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: DELETING => DELETED
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> CHILD_SA closed
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: REKEYED => DELETING
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> sending DELETE for ESP CHILD_SA with SPI cfe718f6
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> closing CHILD_SA con1{6} with SPIs cfe718f6_i (106476374 bytes) cb24b68e_o (129569664 bytes) and TS 10.0.1.0/24|/0 10.2.0.0/16|/0 === 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> received DELETE for ESP CHILD_SA with SPI cb24b68e
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> parsed INFORMATIONAL request 22 [ D ]
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (80 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> sending packet: from 75.61.85.193[500] to 207.162.137.151[500] (496 bytes)
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> generating CREATE_CHILD_SA response 21 [ N(ESP_TFC_PAD_N) SA No KE TSi TSr ]
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: REKEYING => REKEYED
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{6} state change: INSTALLED => REKEYING
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{7} state change: INSTALLING => INSTALLED
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> inbound CHILD_SA con1{7} established with SPIs c421f173_i c0ed26f2_o and TS 10.0.1.0/24|/0 10.2.0.0/16|/0 === 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> SPI 0xc0ed26f2, src 75.61.85.193 dst 207.162.137.151
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> registering outbound ESP SA
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> SPI 0xc421f173, src 207.162.137.151 dst 75.61.85.193
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> adding inbound ESP SA
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> using HMAC_SHA2_256_128 for integrity
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> using AES_CBC for encryption
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CHD] <con1|1> CHILD_SA con1{7} state change: CREATED => INSTALLING
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.1.0.0/16|/0, received: 10.1.0.0/16|/0 => match: 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.1.0.0/16|/0, received: 10.1.0.0/16|/0 => match: 10.1.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> selecting traffic selectors for other:
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.0.1.0/24|/0, received: 10.0.1.0/24|/0 => match: 10.0.1.0/24|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.0.1.0/24|/0, received: 10.2.0.0/16|/0 => no match
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.2.0.0/16|/0, received: 10.0.1.0/24|/0 => no match
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> config: 10.2.0.0/16|/0, received: 10.2.0.0/16|/0 => match: 10.2.0.0/16|/0
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> selecting traffic selectors for us:
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> selected proposal: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA2_256_128/MODP_2048/NO_EXT_SEQ
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> proposal matches
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[CFG] <con1|1> selecting proposal:
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[IKE] <con1|1> received ESP_TFC_PADDING_NOT_SUPPORTED, not using ESPv3 TFC padding
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[ENC] <con1|1> parsed CREATE_CHILD_SA request 21 [ N(REKEY_SA) N(ESP_TFC_PAD_N) SA No KE TSi TSr ]
Apr 9 14:59:42	charon	80312	14[NET] <con1|1> received packet: from 207.162.137.151[500] to 75.61.85.193[500] (512 bytes)
Apr 9 14:57:56	charon	80312	16[CFG] vici client 3068 disconnected
Apr 9 14:57:56	charon	80312	16[CFG] vici client 3068 requests: list-sas
Apr 9 14:57:56	charon	80312	16[CFG] vici client 3068 registered for: list-sa
Apr 9 14:57:56	charon	80312	16[CFG] vici client 3068 connected
Apr 9 14:57:51	charon	80312	16[CFG] vici client 3067 disconnected
Apr 9 14:57:51	charon	80312	05[CFG] vici client 3067 requests: list-sas
            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              TheStormsOfFury @TheStormsOfFury
              last edited by

              Same thing just happened again. 54 minutes after the last one it went down for roughly 45 seconds.

              🤦

              Thanks again all!

              TSoF

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                andrew_cb @TheStormsOfFury
                last edited by

                @TheStormsOfFury said in IPsec site to site dropping every 49-55 minutes:

                @andrew_cb Just looking at this again as I know there is a time difference, but shouldn't this be the configuration if we do not want the IPsec traffic to go out the WAN?

                Action => Block
                Interface => IPsec
                Direction => out
                Address Family => IPv4
                Protocol => Any
                Source => LAN
                Destination => WAN RTR1 / WAN RTR2 / VIP WAN

                Maybe i'm thinking about this wrong, but this would keep IPsec traffic from the lan going out over the wan, or am I wrong?

                PS, the system is still dropping for about 40-50 seconds every 55-ish minutes. I'm going to get the logs again shortly.

                If the remote subnets are being removed from the firewall's routing table then they are sent out the default route (i.e. 0.0.0.0 / WAN).
                When traffic is sent out the WAN, it gets NAT'ed so that the source address is now the WAN IP, and then it is sent out the WAN interface.
                A state is created on the WAN interface with the source address being the WAN IP (due to NAT) and the destination will be the remote VPN subnet.
                This state will persist and cause the firewall to keep sending traffic destined for the remote VPN subnet out the WAN instead.

                Eventually a program will timeout and stop transmitting. When the program tries again, it usually uses a different source port, which causes a new session to be created on the firewall. If the VPN's P2 are established, then the new traffic is correctly sent over the VPN tunnel.

                The floating block rule is set on the WAN interface with source of WAN Address because NAT is performed before the firewall rules are processed.

                T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  TheStormsOfFury @andrew_cb
                  last edited by

                  @andrew_cb Okay, I think i understand now.

                  This means that the rule should look as follows:

                  Action => Block
                  Interface => WAN/WAN VIP
                  Direction => out
                  Address Family => IPv4
                  Protocol => Any
                  Source => WAN/WAN VIP
                  Destination => For Site A = Site B Subnets && for Site B = Site A Subnets

                  Let me know if I've got it right this time!

                  Thanks again,

                  TSoF

                  T A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    TheStormsOfFury @TheStormsOfFury
                    last edited by TheStormsOfFury

                    @andrew_cb well, I have the rules as this one setup above, and it still timed out. Maybe I just need to set P2 to timeout at like 24 hours and then apply it and reboot at like 6:00 AM that way it will take it months to timeout during the working period.

                    It just seems odd that I have "Make before break" enabled, yet it isn't doing that.

                    Thinking about it, I have it set to WAN SUBNETS as the source as this uses CARP and VIP Ip address. Should I change it to just the "IP address" that is the VIP IP?

                    T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T
                      TheStormsOfFury @TheStormsOfFury
                      last edited by TheStormsOfFury

                      @viragomann @andrew_cb

                      So i have my firewall rule to block on the WAN VIP address to see if it will stop that 45-50 second down time.

                      I also performed a test and setup my tunnel times as follows:

                      Phase 1:

                      • Lifetime 604,800 (7 days/168 hours)
                      • ReKey 604,200 (10 minutes less than lifetime)
                      • ReAuth 160 (2 minutes) (This might need to be 604,640)
                      • Rand Time 60 (1 minute)

                      Phase 2:

                      • 86,400 (1 day/24 hours)
                      • 85,800 (10 minutes less than lifetime)
                      • 60 (1 minute)

                      The results were disastrously. The tunnels were resting every 45-50 seconds and it was creating multiple connection visible in the ipsec status.

                      I reset everything back to the original mentioned above, but we're still timing out at the 55-ish minute mark, which is not good during business hours as phone calls and app connections are failing.

                      I do have a question. If i am using make before break, do i still need "Phase One Child SA Close Action" to be restart? Shouldn't it be close?

                      Any thoughts? I'm about ready to move on and try wireguard.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        TheStormsOfFury
                        last edited by

                        I did a little checking and the tunnel is going down every 53 minutes 30 seconds (give or take a second).

                        Then it is down for approximately 38 - 40 seconds.

                        This is super strange that I have make before break enabled, but it is still doing this.

                        Thanks in advance!

                        TSoF

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @TheStormsOfFury
                          last edited by michmoor

                          @TheStormsOfFury said in IPsec site to site dropping every 49-55 minutes:

                          We are running CARP and both sites are running identical hardware (Dell R620) with pfSense 24.11-RELEASE.

                          A couple of things.

                          1. Are you using the WAN CARP address to establish your IPsec tunnels?
                          2. For your IPsec tunnels. Do you have gateway monitoring enabled?
                          3. Have you enabled DPD ?

                          Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                          Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                          Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                          Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                          JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                          T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            TheStormsOfFury @michmoor
                            last edited by

                            @michmoor Thanks for the reply!

                            1.) I am using the shared Virtual IP address so that way if RTR1 goes down RTR2 can provide the services.

                            2.) I need to find that feature. inside Phase One there is a "Gateway Duplicate" that is disabled. Do you know where the "gateway monitoring enabled" is by any chance?

                            3.) DPD is enabled in Phase One on both side of the tunnel.

                            Thanks again!

                            TSoF

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @TheStormsOfFury
                              last edited by

                              @TheStormsOfFury said in IPsec site to site dropping every 49-55 minutes:

                              2.) I need to find that feature. inside Phase One there is a "Gateway Duplicate" that is disabled. Do you know where the "gateway monitoring enabled" is by any chance?

                              System /Routing / Gateways

                              b66c650d-7e6b-46fb-830c-2152db263611-image.png

                              Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                              Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                              Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                              Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                              JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T
                                TheStormsOfFury @michmoor
                                last edited by TheStormsOfFury

                                @michmoor I found the Gateway monitoring setting in: System > Routing > Gateways > Edit

                                Gateway Monitoring - Disable Gateway Monitoring
                                This will consider this gateway as always being up.

                                Is this what you are talking about? Reading it, without it being checked gateway monitoring is enabled.

                                I went ahead and disabled the "Gateway Monitoring" and "Gateway Action."

                                Thanks again,

                                TSoF

                                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @TheStormsOfFury
                                  last edited by

                                  @TheStormsOfFury
                                  I care more about Gateway Action. If that's set, lets unselect for now. Im assuming you are NOT in a multi-wan configuration

                                  What that does is that if there is an issue with your gateway monitor IP (packet loss, jitter) this will bring down the IPsec connection in your case.

                                  Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                                  Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                  Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                  Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                                  JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                                  T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • T
                                    TheStormsOfFury @michmoor
                                    last edited by

                                    @michmoor said in IPsec site to site dropping every 49-55 minutes:

                                    @TheStormsOfFury
                                    I care more about Gateway Action. If that's set, lets unselect for now. Im assuming you are NOT in a multi-wan configuration

                                    What that does is that if there is an issue with your gateway monitor IP (packet loss, jitter) this will bring down the IPsec connection in your case.

                                    Correct, we are in a single WAN configuration. They were both "enabled" or "un-checked" and i went ahead and "checked" them on both sites

                                    TSoF

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @TheStormsOfFury
                                      last edited by michmoor

                                      @TheStormsOfFury great. Let’s monitor IPsec stability.
                                      How soon will you know if it dropped?

                                      Edit: to be clear, disable gateway action is checked? It should be

                                      Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                                      Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                      Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                      Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                                      JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                                      T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • T
                                        TheStormsOfFury @michmoor
                                        last edited by TheStormsOfFury

                                        @michmoor In about 5 minutes. That will be the 53 minute mark. I did make the changes on both sites as well.

                                        Thanks!

                                        TSoF

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • T
                                          TheStormsOfFury @michmoor
                                          last edited by

                                          @michmoor no dice. Still timed out at 53 minutes and 29 seconds for 39 seconds.

                                          Thanks for the suggestions! Open if you have any more.

                                          my logs roll over so quick, i'll have to wait as it's already pushed out.

                                          Thanks again!

                                          TSoF

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @TheStormsOfFury
                                            last edited by

                                            @TheStormsOfFury

                                            Have you read the suggestions here?

                                            https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/troubleshooting/ipsec-connections.html#dpd-is-unsupported-and-one-side-drops-while-the-other-remains

                                            Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                                            Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                            Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                            Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                                            JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                                            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.