• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

New PPPoE backend, some feedback

Development
12
152
6.8k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D
    dsl.ottawa @stephenw10
    last edited by 22 days ago

    @stephenw10
    The multiple connection question is one I can't really answer. All I can say is that it's my providers tester and they sell up to 8gig on residential , so I have to sort of assume that it would take multiple streams into account. There is a comment on their page that mentions Ookla and Speedtest so there may be a linkage to them for the testing. It's an interesting thought though. Is there a known good tester that would be a good one to use to test against ? I'm betting it's going to be hard to get a full pipe test across the internet.

    Yup I've tried both cards for the WAN side of the connection.

    I've even thought that maybe the problem is on the PFSENSE side be elsewhere, like what if it's my desktop that is having the issue (long shot but the reality is that it is a device in the chain of the test)

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • D
      dsl.ottawa @w0w
      last edited by 21 days ago

      @w0w
      I double checked and yup currently it is not there.
      so in my tunables side here are the ones I think I have changed (some have been there for a while to help the 10gig on the LAN side and general performance). and Some where attempts to fix this issue. I'm certainly not an expert when it comes to tuning so it's very possible that something is messed up.

      kern.ipc.somaxconn 4096
      hw.ix.tx_process_limit -1
      hw.ix.rx_process_limit -1
      hw.ix.rxd 4096
      hw.ix.txd 4096
      hw.ix.flow_control 0
      hw.intr_storm_threshold 10000
      net.isr.bindthreads 1
      net.isr.maxthreads 8
      net.inet.rss.enabled 1
      net.inet.rss.bits 2
      net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen 4000
      net.isr.numthreads 8
      hw.ixl.tx_process_limit -1
      hw.ixl.rx_process_limit -1
      hw.ixl.rxd 4096
      hw.ixl.rxd 4096
      dev.ixl.0.fc 0
      dev.ixl.1.fc 0

      and in my boot local file

      net.inet.tcp.lro="0"
      hw.ixl.flow_control="0"
      hw.ix1.num_queues="8"
      dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_qs_enable=1
      dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxqs=8
      dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxqs=8
      dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_qs_enable=1
      dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_nrxqs=8
      dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_ntxqs=8
      dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxds=4096
      dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxds=4096
      dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_nrxds=4096
      dev.ixl.1.iflib.override_ntxds=4096

      And in the netowrk interface side

      TCP Segmentaion offloading, Large Receive and of course use if_pppoe are checked.

      more than 1gig pppoe, I'm not sure where in the world uses it but in Canada, they seem to love their PPPOE, we can get it up to 8gig from one of the providers. Honestly I still miss the old PVC based ATM connections, no special configuration from the users perspective it's just a pipe and it worked lol. I know the reason they use PPPOE it's just in cases like this it's extra overhead to deal with.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by 21 days ago

        Yeah, if it's ookla it's almost certainly multistream. Also at those speeds it would probably need to be.

        I'm not sure I can recommend anything other than the ISPs test at that speed either. Anything that was routed further may be restricted there.

        But check the per-core CPU usage. Is it just hitting a single core limit?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dsl.ottawa @stephenw10
          last edited by 21 days ago

          @stephenw10
          the per core load doesn't seem to be an issue, which would mean that the new backend is doing it's job. I captured this in the middle of the download test.

          CPU 0: 9.4% user, 0.0% nice, 43.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 47.5% idle
          CPU 1: 7.8% user, 0.0% nice, 1.6% system, 18.0% interrupt, 72.5% idle
          CPU 2: 3.9% user, 0.0% nice, 3.1% system, 45.9% interrupt, 47.1% idle
          CPU 3: 6.7% user, 0.0% nice, 3.5% system, 14.5% interrupt, 75.3% idle
          CPU 4: 4.7% user, 0.0% nice, 14.5% system, 27.1% interrupt, 53.7% idle
          CPU 5: 20.4% user, 0.0% nice, 7.1% system, 0.8% interrupt, 71.8% idle
          CPU 6: 12.9% user, 0.0% nice, 28.6% system, 0.4% interrupt, 58.0% idle
          CPU 7: 5.1% user, 0.0% nice, 2.7% system, 27.8% interrupt, 64.3% idle

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
            last edited by 21 days ago

            Hmm, yeah that looks fine. Yet you still see all the traffic on one receive queue?

            D 1 Reply Last reply 21 days ago Reply Quote 0
            • W
              w0w
              last edited by 21 days ago

              Just FYI, some parameters used on one of my firewall with X710 and Xeon(R) CPU E3-1285L v4 :

              net.inet.rss.bucket_mapping: 0:0 1:1 2:2 3:3 4:4 5:5 6:6 7:7 8:0 9:1 10:2 11:3 12:4 13:5 14:6 15:7
              net.inet.rss.debug: 0
              net.inet.rss.basecpu: 0
              net.inet.rss.buckets: 16
              net.inet.rss.maxcpus: 64
              net.inet.rss.ncpus: 8
              net.inet.rss.maxbits: 7
              net.inet.rss.mask: 15
              net.inet.rss.bits: 4
              net.inet.rss.hashalgo: 2
              hw.ixl.flow_control: 0
              hw.ixl.tx_itr: 122
              hw.ixl.rx_itr: 62
              hw.ixl.shared_debug_mask: 0
              hw.ixl.core_debug_mask: 0
              hw.ixl.enable_head_writeback: 1
              hw.ixl.enable_vf_loopback: 1
              hw.ixl.i2c_access_method: 0
              dev.ixl.0.wake: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.xoff_recvd: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.xoff_txd: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.xon_recvd: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.xon_txd: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.tx_frames_big: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.tx_frames_1024_1522: 21680695
              dev.ixl.0.mac.tx_frames_512_1023: 14381471
              dev.ixl.0.mac.tx_frames_256_511: 420044
              dev.ixl.0.mac.tx_frames_128_255: 1330792
              dev.ixl.0.mac.tx_frames_65_127: 2233359
              dev.ixl.0.mac.tx_frames_64: 94083
              dev.ixl.0.mac.checksum_errors: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_jabber: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_oversized: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_fragmented: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_undersize: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_frames_big: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_frames_1024_1522: 837784
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_frames_512_1023: 105087
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_frames_256_511: 526010
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_frames_128_255: 801107
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_frames_65_127: 17592164
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_frames_64: 96374
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_length_errors: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.remote_faults: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.local_faults: 1
              dev.ixl.0.mac.illegal_bytes: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.crc_errors: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.bcast_pkts_txd: 25
              dev.ixl.0.mac.mcast_pkts_txd: 1622
              dev.ixl.0.mac.ucast_pkts_txd: 40138797
              dev.ixl.0.mac.good_octets_txd: 39093159271
              dev.ixl.0.mac.rx_discards: 0
              dev.ixl.0.mac.bcast_pkts_rcvd: 2970
              dev.ixl.0.mac.mcast_pkts_rcvd: 13177
              dev.ixl.0.mac.ucast_pkts_rcvd: 19942379
              dev.ixl.0.mac.good_octets_rcvd: 2847966747
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq03.itr: 122
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq03.bytes: 4629080532
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq03.packets: 5725464
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq03.mss_too_small: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq03.tso: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq02.itr: 122
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq02.bytes: 11637468273
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq02.packets: 10638943
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq02.mss_too_small: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq02.tso: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq01.itr: 122
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq01.bytes: 18307072164
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq01.packets: 18105770
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq01.mss_too_small: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq01.tso: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq00.itr: 122
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq00.bytes: 4364881017
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq00.packets: 5673826
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq00.mss_too_small: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.txq00.tso: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq03.itr: 62
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq03.desc_err: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq03.bytes: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq03.packets: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq03.irqs: 2153626
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq02.itr: 62
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq02.desc_err: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq02.bytes: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq02.packets: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq02.irqs: 2243131
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq01.itr: 62
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq01.desc_err: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq01.bytes: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq01.packets: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq01.irqs: 5679657
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq00.itr: 62
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq00.desc_err: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq00.bytes: 2766924779
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq00.packets: 19948205
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq00.irqs: 13195725
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rx_errors: 0
              dev.ixl.0.pf.bcast_pkts_txd: 25
              dev.ixl.0.pf.mcast_pkts_txd: 281474976710649
              dev.ixl.0.pf.ucast_pkts_txd: 40138797
              dev.ixl.0.pf.good_octets_txd: 38931601458
              dev.ixl.0.pf.rx_discards: 4294966174
              dev.ixl.0.pf.bcast_pkts_rcvd: 2970
              dev.ixl.0.pf.mcast_pkts_rcvd: 791
              dev.ixl.0.pf.ucast_pkts_rcvd: 19941980
              dev.ixl.0.pf.good_octets_rcvd: 2846521088
              dev.ixl.0.admin_irq: 3
              dev.ixl.0.link_active_on_if_down: 1
              dev.ixl.0.eee.rx_lpi_count: 0
              dev.ixl.0.eee.tx_lpi_count: 0
              dev.ixl.0.eee.rx_lpi_status: 0
              dev.ixl.0.eee.tx_lpi_status: 0
              dev.ixl.0.eee.enable: 1
              dev.ixl.0.fw_lldp: 1
              dev.ixl.0.dynamic_tx_itr: 0
              dev.ixl.0.dynamic_rx_itr: 0
              dev.ixl.0.rx_itr: 62
              dev.ixl.0.tx_itr: 122
              dev.ixl.0.unallocated_queues: 380
              dev.ixl.0.fw_version: fw 9.820.73026 api 1.15 nvm 9.20 etid 8000d966 oem 22.5632.9
              dev.ixl.0.current_speed: 10 Gbps
              dev.ixl.0.supported_speeds: 7
              dev.ixl.0.advertise_speed: 7
              dev.ixl.0.fc: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq3.rxq_fl0.buf_size: 2048
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq3.rxq_fl0.credits: 128
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq3.rxq_fl0.cidx: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq3.rxq_fl0.pidx: 128
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq3.cpu: 6
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq2.rxq_fl0.buf_size: 2048
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq2.rxq_fl0.credits: 128
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq2.rxq_fl0.cidx: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq2.rxq_fl0.pidx: 128
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq2.cpu: 4
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq1.rxq_fl0.buf_size: 2048
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq1.rxq_fl0.credits: 128
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq1.rxq_fl0.cidx: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq1.rxq_fl0.pidx: 128
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq1.cpu: 2
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq0.rxq_fl0.buf_size: 2048
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq0.rxq_fl0.credits: 1023
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq0.rxq_fl0.cidx: 685
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq0.rxq_fl0.pidx: 684
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rxq0.cpu: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.r_abdications: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.r_restarts: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.r_stalls: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.r_starts: 5719770
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.r_drops: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.r_enqueues: 5733475
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.ring_state: pidx_head: 1123 pidx_tail: 1123 cidx: 1123 state: IDLE
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.txq_cleaned: 10975024
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.txq_processed: 10975032
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.txq_in_use: 9
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.txq_cidx_processed: 824
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.txq_cidx: 816
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.txq_pidx: 825
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.no_tx_dma_setup: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.txd_encap_efbig: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.tx_map_failed: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.no_desc_avail: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.mbuf_defrag_failed: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.m_pullups: 4578827
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.mbuf_defrag: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq3.cpu: 6
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.r_abdications: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.r_restarts: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.r_stalls: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.r_starts: 10633370
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.r_drops: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.r_enqueues: 10653511
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.ring_state: pidx_head: 1863 pidx_tail: 1863 cidx: 1863 state: IDLE
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.txq_cleaned: 20820188
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.txq_processed: 20820196
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.txq_in_use: 8
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.txq_cidx_processed: 228
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.txq_cidx: 220
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.txq_pidx: 228
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.no_tx_dma_setup: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.txd_encap_efbig: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.tx_map_failed: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.no_desc_avail: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.mbuf_defrag_failed: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.m_pullups: 10415382
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.mbuf_defrag: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq2.cpu: 4
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.r_abdications: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.r_restarts: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.r_stalls: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.r_starts: 18108957
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.r_drops: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.r_enqueues: 18135709
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.ring_state: pidx_head: 0669 pidx_tail: 0669 cidx: 0669 state: IDLE
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.txq_cleaned: 35744277
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.txq_processed: 35744285
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.txq_in_use: 9
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.txq_cidx_processed: 541
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.txq_cidx: 533
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.txq_pidx: 542
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.no_tx_dma_setup: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.txd_encap_efbig: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.tx_map_failed: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.no_desc_avail: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.mbuf_defrag_failed: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.m_pullups: 17863485
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.mbuf_defrag: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq1.cpu: 2
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.r_abdications: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.r_restarts: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.r_stalls: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.r_starts: 5665998
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.r_drops: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.r_enqueues: 5676493
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.ring_state: pidx_head: 1485 pidx_tail: 1485 cidx: 1485 state: IDLE
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.txq_cleaned: 10681309
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.txq_processed: 10681317
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.txq_in_use: 8
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.txq_cidx_processed: 997
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.txq_cidx: 989
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.txq_pidx: 997
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.no_tx_dma_setup: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.txd_encap_efbig: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.tx_map_failed: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.no_desc_avail: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.mbuf_defrag_failed: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.m_pullups: 5253756
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.mbuf_defrag: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.txq0.cpu: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxds: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxds: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.allocated_msix_vectors: 5
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.use_extra_msix_vectors: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.use_logical_cores: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.separate_txrx: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.core_offset: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.tx_abdicate: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.rx_budget: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.disable_msix: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_qs_enable: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxqs: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxqs: 0
              dev.ixl.0.iflib.driver_version: 2.3.3-k
              dev.ixl.0.%iommu: rid=0x100
              dev.ixl.0.%parent: pci1
              dev.ixl.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x15ff subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0006 class=0x020000
              dev.ixl.0.%location: slot=0 function=0 dbsf=pci0:1:0:0 handle=\_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP
              dev.ixl.0.%driver: ixl
              dev.ixl.0.%desc: Intel(R) Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GBASE-T - 2.3.3-k
              dev.ixl.%parent:
              ixl0@pci0:1:0:0:	class=0x020000 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor=0x8086 device=0x15ff subvendor=0x8086 subdevice=0x0006
                  vendor     = 'Intel Corporation'
                  device     = 'Ethernet Controller X710 for 10GBASE-T'
                  class      = network
                  subclass   = ethernet
                  bar   [10] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xfbe000000, size 16777216, enabled
                  bar   [1c] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xfbf018000, size 32768, enabled
                  cap 01[40] = powerspec 3  supports D0 D3  current D0
                  cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit, vector masks
                  cap 11[70] = MSI-X supports 129 messages, enabled
                               Table in map 0x1c[0x0], PBA in map 0x1c[0x1000]
                  cap 10[a0] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(2048) FLR
                               max read 512
                               link x8(x8) speed 8.0(8.0) ASPM L1(L1)
                  cap 03[e0] = VPD
                  ecap 0001[100] = AER 2 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected
                  ecap 0003[140] = Serial 1 8477c9ffff9196b4
                  ecap 000e[150] = ARI 1
                  ecap 0010[160] = SR-IOV 1 IOV disabled, Memory Space disabled, ARI disabled
                                   0 VFs configured out of 32 supported
                                   First VF RID Offset 0x0110, VF RID Stride 0x0001
                                   VF Device ID 0x154c
                                   Page Sizes: 4096 (enabled), 8192, 65536, 262144, 1048576, 4194304
                  ecap 0017[1a0] = TPH Requester 1
                  ecap 000d[1b0] = ACS 1 Source Validation unavailable, Translation Blocking unavailable
                                   P2P Req Redirect unavailable, P2P Cmpl Redirect unavailable
                                   P2P Upstream Forwarding unavailable, P2P Egress Control unavailable
                                   P2P Direct Translated unavailable, Enhanced Capability unavailable
                  ecap 0019[1d0] = PCIe Sec 1 lane errors 0
              

              @dsl-ottawa
              Is there a way to test pfSense WAN to LAN throughput without using PPPoE?
              I don’t remember exactly what I set up back then, but it was something like an iPerf server on the WAN side (hooked to 10Gbit switch) with a 10 Gbit interface — and of course, the same on the LAN side, but client...

              D 2 Replies Last reply 21 days ago Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dsl.ottawa @stephenw10
                last edited by 21 days ago

                @stephenw10 Yup yup

                dev.ixl.0.pf.txq07.packets: 8401098
                dev.ixl.0.pf.txq06.packets: 7316577
                dev.ixl.0.pf.txq05.packets: 3704542
                dev.ixl.0.pf.txq04.packets: 4271522
                dev.ixl.0.pf.txq03.packets: 3784653
                dev.ixl.0.pf.txq02.packets: 7219027
                dev.ixl.0.pf.txq01.packets: 4471821
                dev.ixl.0.pf.txq00.packets: 2694355
                dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq07.packets: 0
                dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq06.packets: 0
                dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq05.packets: 0
                dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq04.packets: 0
                dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq03.packets: 0
                dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq02.packets: 0
                dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq01.packets: 0
                dev.ixl.0.pf.rxq00.packets: 47313613

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  dsl.ottawa @w0w
                  last edited by 21 days ago

                  @w0w Thanks for this I'll do some comparisons and see if there is something different.

                  What I might do this weekend, is push the pppoe back up to the provider modem and just run it as dhcp from there. I know it will be double NAT but if it's something between the PPPOE and the queuing that should then clear up. If I get better results and the queues are better then it narrows it down, and proves the rest of my network. I had already ran iperf between other devices and the firewall when I upgraded servers and switches to 10gig to try and tune everything, so it shouldn't be but I don't want to discount it without some proof either.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • D
                    dsl.ottawa @w0w
                    last edited by 21 days ago

                    @w0w Taking into account that I have 4 more queues than you did here's what I see are differences.

                    dev.ixl.0.eee.enable: 0
                    dev.ixl.0.unallocated_queues: 760 <- makes sense I have more queues enabled.
                    dev.ixl.0.fw_version: fw 6.81.49447 api 1.7 nvm 6.80 etid 80003d72 oem 18.4608.9
                    dev.ixl.0.supported_speeds: 6 <- probably due to the firmware difference.
                    dev.ixl.0.advertise_speed: 6 <- probably due to the firmware difference.
                    dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxds: 4096 <-these are in my overrides so expected.
                    dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxds: 4096 <-these are in my overrides so expected.
                    dev.ixl.0.iflib.allocated_msix_vectors: 9
                    dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_qs_enable: 1
                    dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_nrxqs: 8 <-related to my extra queue tests.
                    dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_ntxqs: 8 <-related to my extra queue tests.

                    so
                    a) I could try updating the firmware, never a bad thing
                    b) unsure about the
                    dev.ixl.0.eee.enable: 0
                    dev.ixl.0.iflib.allocated_msix_vectors: 9
                    dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_qs_enable: 1
                    and
                    c)Your queue outputs show that on the RX side only the one queue was active on yours too.

                    W 1 Reply Last reply 21 days ago Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      mr_nets @stephenw10
                      last edited by 21 days ago

                      @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                      What CPU usage are you seeing when you test? What about per core usage? I one core still pegged at 100%

                      Netgate 6100

                      Internet: 1G(1200 Mb/s) Down / 1G Up

                      3x Stream 4K 60FPS on 3 device
                      2x Download using Steam on 2 device
                      1x OpenVPN session open on the router but not very busy
                      2x Speed test (spot where it reach 1 gig) on 1 device

                      login-to-view

                      This is what it's look like in Grafana Cloud , it's not the most accurate I've seen but it's really close (I saw some spike at 80% for cpu 0 system on top "top -P" during the speed test ). What we can observe is that cpu 0 still very busy compare to the other cpu.

                      login-to-view

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • W
                        w0w @dsl.ottawa
                        last edited by 21 days ago

                        @dsl-ottawa said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                        a) I could try updating the firmware, never a bad thing
                        b) unsure about the
                        dev.ixl.0.eee.enable: 0
                        dev.ixl.0.iflib.allocated_msix_vectors: 9
                        dev.ixl.0.iflib.override_qs_enable: 1
                        and
                        c)Your queue outputs show that on the RX side only the one queue was active on yours too.

                        I don't think those parameters are related to the problem — they seem like some OEM firmware/CPU settings, maybe.
                        And about the queue... That’s a good find! I didn’t pay attention to it before. Hmm, interesting...
                        I have a gigabit PPPoE connection, and the new backend gives me slightly better speeds compared to MPD5 with the deferred option. It almost saturates my ISP’s Ethernet link — over 900 Mbps — which I think is a great result for 20-year-old Cat5 cabling.

                        D 1 Reply Last reply 21 days ago Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          dsl.ottawa @w0w
                          last edited by 21 days ago

                          @w0w I would agree nothing there in the settings..

                          BUT I found some more info.. and I should have kept to my gut feeling and done the further tests before pinpointing the PPPOE.

                          I disabled my pppoe and ran straight IP, to my provider modem, so double nat'd.

                          1. All the queues were used. as expected.
                          2. my desktop speed tests DIDNT CHANGE, still slow downloads
                          3. I found a copy of the cli speedtest package for pfsense and installed it.
                            - download test from the pfsense box came back at full 3gig
                            - upload was slower than normal but I'm less worried about that since my desktop tests were fine
                          4. put PPPOE back, and ran the same tests.
                            - download 3gig from pfsense using speedtest-cli
                            - and normal 1.7-1.9 on my desktop

                          This to me proves that it's not the PPPOE or even the wan side of pfsense but something on my bleepin LAN, or at a minimum the LAN side of pfsense.

                          On the up side it does seem to prove that the single queue on the download isn't an issue :)

                          W 1 Reply Last reply 21 days ago Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by 21 days ago

                            Ah that's interesting!

                            What did the per-core CPU usage look like when downloading at 3G over PPPoE? Though the speedtest itself will be using a lot.

                            D 1 Reply Last reply 21 days ago Reply Quote 0
                            • D
                              dsl.ottawa @stephenw10
                              last edited by 21 days ago

                              @stephenw10 it's a pretty quick test so I'm not sure it's a good capture

                              CPU 0: 11.8% user, 0.0% nice, 28.6% system, 0.0% interrupt, 59.6% idle
                              CPU 1: 3.9% user, 0.0% nice, 6.3% system, 10.2% interrupt, 79.6% idle
                              CPU 2: 12.2% user, 0.0% nice, 7.8% system, 7.1% interrupt, 72.9% idle
                              CPU 3: 5.9% user, 0.0% nice, 6.3% system, 11.0% interrupt, 76.9% idle
                              CPU 4: 10.6% user, 0.0% nice, 7.8% system, 8.2% interrupt, 73.3% idle
                              CPU 5: 4.7% user, 0.0% nice, 8.6% system, 12.9% interrupt, 73.7% idle
                              CPU 6: 5.1% user, 0.0% nice, 6.7% system, 17.3% interrupt, 71.0% idle
                              CPU 7: 4.3% user, 0.0% nice, 7.1% system, 11.0% interrupt, 77.6% idle

                              but it certainly looks clean

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • W
                                w0w @dsl.ottawa
                                last edited by 21 days ago

                                @dsl-ottawa said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                put PPPOE back, and ran the same tests.

                                • download 3gig from pfsense using speedtest-cli
                                • and normal 1.7-1.9 on my desktop

                                Is there any chance that some old limiters, rules, traffic shaping, or other configurations are still active?
                                If this is a clean install, I would suspect a bug in pfSense

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  mr_nets @w0w
                                  last edited by mr_nets 19 days ago 19 days ago

                                  I make a script to monitor the queues of the parent interface IX2 and all data goes through the queue 0 on the RX side.

                                  BTW my ISP use a VLAN (IX2 --> VLAN40 --> PPPoE) maybe it doesn't help to manage the queues correctly...

                                  In 24 Hours
                                  login-to-view

                                  W 1 Reply Last reply 19 days ago Reply Quote 0
                                  • W
                                    w0w @mr_nets
                                    last edited by w0w 19 days ago 19 days ago

                                    @mr_nets
                                    There may be only one queue on the network card, but packets can be distributed across CPU cores. Previously, due to netgraph, everything was handled by a single core. The deferred option slightly improved this, but it was a limited improvement—overall, performance was bottlenecked by a single CPU core. At least that limitation no longer exists now.

                                    In theory, if the network queue never fills up, there shouldn't be any issues. I don't know what the theoretical maximum throughput of a PPPoE session is—maybe Netgate specialists have already tested this? I would expect something like 2.5–3.5 Gbps with multithreaded download.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                      last edited by 19 days ago

                                      It still depends on the hardware but we were able to pass >8Gbps through a 6100 in raw testing: https://www.netgate.com/blog/optimizing-pppoe-performance-in-pfsense-software

                                      W 1 Reply Last reply 19 days ago Reply Quote 1
                                      • W
                                        w0w @stephenw10
                                        last edited by 19 days ago

                                        @stephenw10 said in New PPPoE backend, some feedback:

                                        It still depends on the hardware but we were able to pass >8Gbps through a 6100 in raw testing: https://www.netgate.com/blog/optimizing-pppoe-performance-in-pfsense-software

                                        Thanks, great read. Too bad I missed it, but I'm glad you brought it to me today. 🙂

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • C
                                          claudio69
                                          last edited by 18 days ago

                                          I am testing pfSense 2.8 on my pppoe WAN setup that has been working for many years.
                                          I noticed that the weekly periodic reset I set on the pppoe WAN is not automatically performed on the weekend.
                                          If I try to change the setting manually the pppoe connection resets and reconnects but then it will no longer do so automatically

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          39 out of 152
                                          • First post
                                            39/152
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.