Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Is this normal behavior for the Resolver to act that way?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    51 Posts 4 Posters 3.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      marchand.guy @stephenw10
      last edited by

      @stephenw10 Will do but not now. The wife is annoyed when I cut her internet 😊

      Good tip on checking the states while failing.
      Thank you.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • M
        marchand.guy @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10 If you can't replicate, it means it's particular to my installation. I will need time to investigate.

        Thank you

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          How are you testing? After reboot I tested from Diag > DNS Lookup and can see Unbound responding on localhost.

          I could imagine the internal forward rule doing something odd at boot perhaps.

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            marchand.guy @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 Ok! Thank you for sharing that. That is NOT how I test. I test from different machines, starting with my computer. None of my browser bookmarks respond after a reboot of the FW. Until I restart unbound, as stated.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              Mmm, so it could be some LAN side issue. Try checking from Diag > DNS Lookup locally to narrow it down.

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                marchand.guy @stephenw10
                last edited by

                @stephenw10 Diag DNS Lookup responds after 16 seconds! No replies on the LAN side with my computer. At this point, the problem is on my side. I will continue to investigate and report anything useful.

                Thank you

                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @marchand.guy
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  @marchand-guy did you mean 16ms? no client would wait 16 seconds for a response before giving up.. 2 seconds or 5 seconds are normally time limits for dns response.

                  You could ask a ns on the other side of the planet, and he could ask another ns on your side of the planet and it still shouldn't be anywhere close to 16 seconds.. Something is wrong if your measuring dns response in seconds vs ms.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    marchand.guy @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz You read it right 16 SECONDS. Clearly, after a reboot, the DNS service is defective until i manually restart unbound from the GUI. I need to backtrack everything I did untill I find the setting that creates this ptoblem. Although I can't stop wondering how many of you use SSL/TLS for outgoing DNS Queries to Forwarding Servers, plus, have not selected All interfaces by default as I did, plus, have disabled IPv6 (even though it is still showing on the dashboard as a listening address for DNS), and have rebooted with that configuration,

                    johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @marchand.guy
                      last edited by johnpoz

                      @marchand-guy said in Is this normal behavior for the Resolver to act that way?:

                      (even though it is still showing on the dashboard as a listening address for DNS),

                      there was just a thread about how to make that go away if it bugs you.. That ::1 is just ipv6 loopback. Was that you?

                      Dashboard isn't a listening address, that is NS that pfsense can use. Not IPs of unbound listening on.

                      I can tell you there are quite a few users doing the tls forwarding.. I personally don't see the point.. But as you can see from my previous test it works just fine - and makes no sense that it wouldn't work unless your listening on your wan..

                      You sure you don't have clients pointing to your wan address or something?

                      Taking a look at your outbound nats - yeah those are borked if you ask me, and could explain your issues maybe - your forcing traffic out your vpn and have no nat for just your normal lan side networks to be able to use your wan IP natted. You followed some idiot guide from some vpn services didn't you.. There is zero reason to do manual outbound nat - just use hybrid and map what you would need for vpn interface you want to route traffic out.

                      example: I can route anything I want out my vpn connection if I so desire..

                      vpn.jpg

                      Those other outbound nats are to talk to my modem on its 192.168.100 address and I do source natting to talk to cameras behind a nvr because they use the nvr as their gateway.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Yup I use forwarding to DoT in 2.8 here without issue.

                        What does DNS Lookup actually show? For example:

                        Screenshot from 2025-05-28 15-59-37.png

                        That's with DNS set to 'use local, fall back to remote' in general setup.

                        If you have other servers that are not responding you will see significant delays.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          marchand.guy @johnpoz
                          last edited by

                          @johnpoz Borked outbound NAT, you say? Here they are again:
                          91d9c87e-df66-4236-8410-059383249d86-image.png
                          I control what goes trough the VPN interface with rules that specify the VPN1 interface. All other rules use the default WAN interface, as it should.
                          Anyway, I need to investigate further.

                          Thank you.

                          johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            marchand.guy @stephenw10
                            last edited by

                            @stephenw10 The "recipe" for ssl/tls forwarding specifies "Set DNS Resolution Behavior to Use local DNS (127.0.0.1), ignore remote DNS Servers"

                            https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/dns-over-tls.html

                            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • johnpozJ
                              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @marchand.guy
                              last edited by

                              @marchand-guy your previous post was missing this one

                              missing.jpg

                              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M
                                marchand.guy @johnpoz
                                last edited by

                                @johnpoz I know. That's why I reposted it. I should have guessed that you would make the effort of looking at it 😀

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @marchand.guy
                                  last edited by johnpoz

                                  @marchand-guy said in Is this normal behavior for the Resolver to act that way?:

                                  "Set DNS Resolution Behavior to Use local DNS (127.0.0.1), ignore remote DNS Servers"

                                  yeah technically that is true - or you could have a scenario where pfsense directly talks to servers you have in general without the tls. So guess you have to live with the ::1 listed as NS you could talk to ;) Or you could run into a scenario where pfsense doesn't use tls to talk to your remote tls server you want to talk to. When itself wants to resolve something - like is there an update available, need to pull the list of available packages.. etc. but clients talking to pfsense IP for dns would not.

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Yup that's why I mentioned it since you would normally only see local host there if you have followed the guide.

                                    But importantly you should not see anything that's present and unresponsive.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      marchand.guy @stephenw10
                                      last edited by

                                      @stephenw10 said in Is this normal behavior for the Resolver to act that way?:

                                      you would normally only see local host there if you have followed the guide.

                                      Not according to the doc at https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/dns-over-tls.html#figure-dot-servers

                                      But maybe I misunderstand what you are meaning.

                                      What I see on the dashboard is:
                                      c1bf0912-a5fb-4e02-acb3-0a97bbc0fc4b-image.png

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        marchand.guy @johnpoz
                                        last edited by marchand.guy

                                        @johnpoz said in Is this normal behavior for the Resolver to act that way?:

                                        but clients talking to pfsense IP for dns would not.

                                        And I made sure of that with this NAT:
                                        220b79a6-d521-4ca5-bcf3-d9697bf9e226-image.png
                                        (and yes, I tried without it)

                                        And I go further withe these rules (and yes, I tried without them):
                                        69e73926-364e-4f1e-b1bc-a9a5fa242393-image.png
                                        cd99837a-68fb-4990-9340-d4d17602a44b-image.png

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stephenw10S
                                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                          last edited by

                                          Oh, you're right it does still test them from Diag > DNS Lookup even if it ignores them for real resolution.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            marchand.guy
                                            last edited by marchand.guy

                                            UPDATE:
                                            After stripping the FW of all packages, openVPN client, NAT and rules associates, it turns out that the openVPN client installation is causing the problem. I suspect it has something to do with the DNS it is trying to use, as I am not allowing it to use it's own resolver. I will read further on that and try in making it work. Thank you all.

                                            Correction: This morning stripping th FW did not correct the problem. Until unbound restarts.

                                            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.