Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Packets go through, logging is set, but no logs of the traffic

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    15 Posts 4 Posters 117 Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S Offline
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Ok, so to confirm you see states and packets on the rule as shown in the gui?

      Try reloading the ruleset in Status > Filter Reload and make sure it loads cleanly without errors.

      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S Offline
        silviub @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10 Yes, I can see the states and packets next to the rule.
        The firewall loads with no issues, just did it.

        Nothing changed.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S Offline
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Hmm, OK. Check the actual ruleset in /tmp/rules.debug. Do you see your custom rule? Does it have 'log' set?

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S Offline
            silviub @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10
            pass in log quick on $WAN reply-to ( vtnet0 a.b.c.d ) inet proto udp from any to 10.151.0.5 port 1194 ridentifier 1702983321 keep state label "USER_RULE: OpenVPN" label "id:1702983321"

            Yes, it seems to have the log stanza (pass in log quick).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • chpalmerC Offline
              chpalmer @silviub
              last edited by

              @silviub said in Packets go through, logging is set, but no logs of the traffic:

              but there isn't really any client here

              Just a refresher coarse.. client device requests... server listens and grants. rinse and repeat.

              Very basic.. Cant have a connection between two computers without that.

              Carry on.

              Triggering snowflakes one by one..
              Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                silviub @chpalmer
                last edited by

                @chpalmer while you're technically right, I was replying to stephenw10, who said

                An OpenVPN connection like that could be open for months so it's possible any states you see were created before you enabled logging?

                So, in that regard, there wasn't a VPN client that kept the connections open. Please read above.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S Offline
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  Is the firewall logging anything? If you create some other rule as a test with logging does it work as expected?

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S Offline
                    silviub @stephenw10
                    last edited by silviub

                    @stephenw10 Yes, it does. And weirdly enough, some packets in this rule are logged, while others are not. I tried from two different public IPs to nc -u <IP> <port> and one got logged, one didn't, even though in States I see both of them.... What's going on?! :D

                    P.S. It can't match a different rule - one that is not logging let's say - because ALL my rules are set to log. So no matter what rule it'd match, I'd have to see it in the logs.

                    When I opened this forum post I tried to reach the machine from a certain public IP. That was on the 17th of October. I can still see that log line. If I open a new connection (different source port, naturally), the traffic is forwarded properly, the traffic reaches the target machine, but I don't see the connection in the logs, even though I see it in the states.

                    P.S. could it be an issue that the target machine doesn't reply? Since this is UDP, I get no reply from the target....?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stephenw10S Offline
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by

                      Hmm, I mean matching some other unexpected rule is about the only thing I could imagine doing this. It could be something dynamic perhaps.

                      If you check states created by the traffic using pfctl -vss and grep-ing for something do you see the expected rule number? The same rule number on very state?

                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S Offline
                        silviub @stephenw10
                        last edited by

                        @stephenw10

                        # pfctl -vss | grep x.y.z.xx
                        all udp 10.151.0.5:1194 (a.b.c.d:1194) <- x.y.z.xx:56223       NO_TRAFFIC:SINGLE
                        vtnet2.305 udp x.y.z.xx:56223 -> 10.151.0.5:1194       SINGLE:NO_TRAFFIC
                        

                        I don't see a rule number anywhere.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stephenw10S Offline
                          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                          last edited by

                          Ah sorry you'll need to show the following two lines so something like:

                          [25.11-BETA][root@fw1.stevew.lan]/root: pfctl -vvss | grep -A 2 9.9.9.9
                          mvneta0 icmp 9.9.9.9:8 <- 172.21.16.8:1       0:0
                             age 00:00:11, expires in 00:00:09, 11:11 pkts, 924:924 bytes, anchor 0, rule 147
                             id: 8c2ef86800000000 creatorid: 92ac4dc8
                          mvneta2 icmp 192.168.1.5:18952 (172.21.16.8:1) -> 9.9.9.9:8       0:0
                             age 00:00:11, expires in 00:00:09, 11:11 pkts, 924:924 bytes, anchor 3, rule 118, allow-opts
                             id: 8d2ef86800000000 creatorid: 92ac4dc8 route-to: 192.168.1.1@mvneta2
                          

                          You can then show those rules with:

                          [25.11-BETA][root@fw1.stevew.lan]/root: pfctl -vvsr | grep -A 4 @147
                          @147 pass in quick on mvneta0 inet from <LAN__NETWORK:3> to any flags S/SA keep state (if-bound) label "id=0100000101" label "tags=user_rule" label "descr=Default allow LAN to any rule" ridentifier 100000101
                            [ Evaluations: 49494     Packets: 5811923   Bytes: 3914848338  States: 347   ]
                            [ Source Nodes: 0      Limit: 0      NAT/RDR: 0      Route: 0      ]
                            [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 0 State Creations: 48158 ]
                            [ Last Active Time: Tue Oct 21 01:15:44 2025 ]
                          [25.11-BETA][root@fw1.stevew.lan]/root: pfctl -vvsr | grep -A 4 @118
                          @118 pass out route-to (mvneta2 192.168.1.1) inet from 192.168.1.5 to ! 192.168.1.0/24 flags S/SA keep state (if-bound) allow-opts label "descr=let out anything from firewall host itself" ridentifier 1000012111
                            [ Evaluations: 49788     Packets: 4976110   Bytes: 3430787939  States: 265   ]
                            [ Source Nodes: 0      Limit: 0      NAT/RDR: 0      Route: 0      ]
                            [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 0 State Creations: 27846 ]
                            [ Last Active Time: Tue Oct 21 01:16:02 2025 ]
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.