Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Warning about IKEV2 with multiple phase 2s not working bug

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    5 Posts 2 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      MarioG
      last edited by

      I wanted to contribute some info here that may save some poor soul many hours. I have an IPSEC connection to a client that required two phase 2 definitions due to multiple subnets. We could not get it working after 2 days. They had a Cisco ASA so we got Cisco involved, after a few hours the person stated the error was due to having only one SA for the tunnel and he was aware of a Strongswan/Pfsense problem. He said it was due to Strongswan not providing 2 SAs for IKEV2. Sure enough, we went to IKEV1 and all was well. A few days later I found https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/6324 which was exactly the problem. I don't know if I should post there since I am new to Pfsense and not a developer, but figured I might save someone headaches someday if I post here.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        It is a limitation in the ASA. Enable split connections. 6324 is something different.

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          MarioG
          last edited by

          OK, but theirs is an ASA 5545 and the Cisco guy said the single SA was a known Strongswan problem in the Cisco database. I don't know anything about the Cisco stuff and will run the "enable split connections" by them but most likely to stay on IKEV1 since it takes a lot to get the client to work on this. Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            Again. Not a bug in StrongSwan or pfSense but a limitation in the ASA for which there is a workaround. That Split Connections checkbox exists specifically to work around the limitation in the ASA's IKEv2.

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              MarioG
              last edited by

              Thanks for clearing that up! I sent the client a link to this thread which I hope they share with the Cisco person.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.