Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    44 Posts 7 Posters 359 Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • tinfoilmattT Offline
      tinfoilmatt @Mastiff
      last edited by tinfoilmatt

      @Mastiff said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

      I tried to make a Port Forward NAT rule from WAN to 192.168.6.2 (the IP of the Hass VM), with 54230 as the port, but that did not help.

      NAT rules do not determine nor cause ports to be used by network hosts. NAT rule parameters merely specify which parameters (i.e., interface, IP version, protocol, [source IP]:[source port], and [destination IP]:[destination port]) the rule will 'act' on.

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V Offline
        viragomann @Mastiff
        last edited by

        @Mastiff said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

        You obviously did not read the first post about this setup before you started to doubt that it is on the WAN.

        Sure, I've read it. But this was yesterday and my brain is aged. 😉

        Okay, the receiver is connected to WAN. So pfSense already nats the traffic to it, since your outbound NAT is in hybride mode.

        Btw I ride a Honda Blackbird.

        But Honda doesn't build AV receivers. 😜

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          Mastiff @tinfoilmatt
          last edited by

          @tinfoilmatt I am aware of that. But it seems like the receiver is trying to contact back on 54230.

          @viragomann No, you're right. Only Yamaha does both that and motorcycles. 🤣 I used to have an RD350 two stroke some years ago. And the problem (at least if I understand the packet capture) is not that Hass can't contact the receiver, it's that the receiver can't contact back.

          tinfoilmattT johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • tinfoilmattT Offline
            tinfoilmatt @Mastiff
            last edited by tinfoilmatt

            @Mastiff said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

            I am aware of that. But it seems like the receiver is trying to contact back on 54230.

            You can't be aware of what I said if that's your response. The receiver's 'network stack' is apparently programmed to use a range of TCP source ports (presumably somewhere within, but potentially not exclusive to, a 52[xxx]-54[xxx] range).

            Stephen's advice already accounted for anything your attempting to address on this specific point by suggesting you use a source port ANY/* in your "NAT til Yamaha-forsterkere" NAT rule.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ Offline
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @Mastiff
              last edited by johnpoz

              @Mastiff said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

              is not that Hass can't contact the receiver, it's that the receiver can't contact back.

              If you allow traffic out - the return traffic is always allowed back via the state.

              Only time you would need a port forward is if something on your wan was trying to initiate traffic.

              That you have stuff on your "wan" is curious - why would your stuff not just be on another segment behind pfsense.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8.1, 25.07.1

              tinfoilmattT M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • tinfoilmattT Offline
                tinfoilmatt @johnpoz
                last edited by

                Something about using RFC1918 on both the WAN and LAN interfaces may require particular static routing and/or reconfiguration of pfSense settings (e.g., Interfaces / WAN / Block private networks and loopback addresses).

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  Mastiff @johnpoz
                  last edited by

                  @johnpoz As I said in my first message, this is a pfSense on my "outer" LAN, which is defined as WAN in it, that routes traffic to Home Asistant, and only the traffic I want there. So it's not a real WAN.

                  @tinfoilmatt I have already removed the tick in "Block private networks". And this one plug-in is the only thing that has problems, MQTT, SCRAPE sensors on port 8880-8889 and about ten other services and maybe 50 devices have no problems getting back and forth. Which is why I am not understanding this at all.

                  tinfoilmattT johnpozJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • tinfoilmattT Offline
                    tinfoilmatt @Mastiff
                    last edited by

                    @Mastiff Can you show your packet capture settings?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • tinfoilmattT Offline
                      tinfoilmatt
                      last edited by

                      And what's your 'outer' firewall/gateway? On the 192.168.1.0/24 network I mean. Also pfSense? I think you're going to need a static route configured on whatever that gateway is, directing traffic destined for the 192.168.6.0/24 subnet to use gateway 192.168.1.53.

                      (This topology is terribly designed by the way.)

                      patient0P M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • patient0P Offline
                        patient0 @tinfoilmatt
                        last edited by

                        @tinfoilmatt said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

                        I think you're going to need a static route configured on whatever that gateway is, directing traffic destined for the 192.168.6.0/24 subnet to use gateway 192.168.1.53

                        Since pfSense is NAT-ing the .6.x traffic to the 192.168.1.x address of pfSense WAN that should not be necessary.

                        tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          Mastiff @tinfoilmatt
                          last edited by Mastiff

                          @tinfoilmatt I know. So @johnpoz told me in no uncertain terms in 2018, when I built the setup (actually two setups, identical at my summer home and in my house). Four pfSense inside the first pfSense, with heavy use of HA Proxy, doing routing of traffic with different URLs so everything is sendt whereever it has to, no matter if I'm on the network or on a phone network in another place. And yet it has worked close to perfectly, doing exactly what I needed it to do for those seven years, with almost no changes. Just like my boat it's no beauty, but it does the job I need it to do.

                          Here are the rules for capturing:

                          b8c9e340-e40d-4c38-b6d9-be3054b115e8-image.png

                          My outer firewall on this system is a Netgate SG-3100 (the other system has a MiniTX with a Intel PCI-E four port network card). Those work as regular firewalls from WAN to LAN. There are normal WANs outside (1 gbit fibre) and normal LANs inside those, and I use the pfSense LAN as WAN for my identical Windows Server 2022 running a bunch of VM's, and some Pi's are outside as well. But if I needed a static route on that, wouldn't I need that for my Pi that up to now has been running this plug-in?

                          There are no network segments coming into play on this. I have one extra network segment on each place, but they are completely isolated and only used for sharing WAN with neighbours at the summer home and with the rental appartment in the house. They do not have access to anything but the actual WAN.

                          patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • patient0P Offline
                            patient0 @Mastiff
                            last edited by

                            @Mastiff said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

                            my Pi that up to now has been running this plug-in?

                            Btw: you could run a tcpdump on the Pi to see how the working traffic looks like. And from that it may be possible to figure out the issue.

                            github user graememorgan has a "Yamaha-YNCA-Receivers.pdf" in his repo (together with a short and old Python script). In that (also old) PDF under "2.2.2 Ethernet Port Settings" it mentions:

                            Default network port number : 50000/TCP
                            Variable range : 50000 to 65535
                            
                            Port setting can be changed by YNCA or YNC command only. See 4.2.3 Port Number Change
                            for details.
                            

                            You seem to be right about port 50000/tcp.

                            M tinfoilmattT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Offline
                              Mastiff @patient0
                              last edited by Mastiff

                              @patient0 The return port from the receiver (1.200) to the Pi (1.101) seems to be varying. I see 43636 on this, I'll try to open for that. Can the receiver be pushing here, so that's why it isn't working?

                              sudo tcpdump -i eth0 tcp portrange 50000-65535 and src 192.168.1.200
                              tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]... for full protocol decode
                              listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
                              17:31:36.686934 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 1420605076:1420605101, ack 3707639785, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571150897 ecr 903009886], length 25
                              17:31:54.754639 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 25:38, ack 15, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571152704 ecr 903027941], length 13
                              17:31:54.759907 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 38:181, ack 15, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571152704 ecr 903027956], length 143
                              17:31:54.763822 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 181:290, ack 15, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571152705 ecr 903027961], length 109
                              17:31:59.216182 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 290:308, ack 34, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571153150 ecr 903032402], length 18
                              17:31:59.216819 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 308:327, ack 34, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571153150 ecr 903032417], length 19
                              17:31:59.829041 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 327:355, ack 34, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571153211 ecr 903032418], length 28
                              17:31:59.830096 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 355:386, ack 34, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571153211 ecr 903033030], length 31
                              17:31:59.869126 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 386:425, ack 34, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571153215 ecr 903033031], length 39
                              17:31:59.870113 IP 192.168.1.200.50000 > 192.168.1.101.43636: Flags [P.], seq 425:456, ack 34, win 3620, options [nop,nop,TS val 2571153215 ecr 903033070], length 31
                              ^C
                              10 packets captured
                              10 packets received by filter
                              0 packets dropped by kernel
                              
                              sudo tcpdump -i eth0 tcp portrange 50000-65535 and dst 192.168.1.200
                              tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]... for full protocol decode
                              listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), snapshot length 262144 bytes
                              17:33:24.784203 IP 192.168.1.101.43636 > 192.168.1.200.50000: Flags [P.], seq 3707639854:3707639868, ack 1420605582, win 501, options [nop,nop,TS val 903117985 ecr 2571159169], length 14
                              17:33:24.805569 IP 192.168.1.101.43636 > 192.168.1.200.50000: Flags [.], ack 14, win 501, options [nop,nop,TS val 903118007 ecr 2571161709], length 0
                              17:33:24.809778 IP 192.168.1.101.43636 > 192.168.1.200.50000: Flags [.], ack 266, win 501, options [nop,nop,TS val 903118011 ecr 2571161709], length 0
                              17:33:27.204179 IP 192.168.1.101.43636 > 192.168.1.200.50000: Flags [P.], seq 14:33, ack 266, win 501, options [nop,nop,TS val 903120405 ecr 2571161709], length 19
                              17:33:27.220209 IP 192.168.1.101.43636 > 192.168.1.200.50000: Flags [.], ack 284, win 501, options [nop,nop,TS val 903120421 ecr 2571161950], length 0
                              17:33:27.220808 IP 192.168.1.101.43636 > 192.168.1.200.50000: Flags [.], ack 303, win 501, options [nop,nop,TS val 903120422 ecr 2571161950], length 0
                              ^C
                              6 packets captured
                              6 packets received by filter
                              0 packets dropped by kernel
                              

                              Edit: Adding

                              patient0P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • tinfoilmattT Offline
                                tinfoilmatt @patient0
                                last edited by

                                @patient0 said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

                                Since pfSense is NAT-ing the .6.x traffic to the 192.168.1.x address of pfSense WAN that should not be necessary.

                                But that doesn't account for the Yamaha receiver's default gateway not being 192.168.1.53.

                                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M Offline
                                  Mastiff @tinfoilmatt
                                  last edited by

                                  @tinfoilmatt Correct, that's 192.168.1.1.

                                  tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • tinfoilmattT Offline
                                    tinfoilmatt @patient0
                                    last edited by

                                    @patient0 said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

                                    You seem to be right about port 50000/tcp.

                                    Nobody's contended this point.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • tinfoilmattT Offline
                                      tinfoilmatt @Mastiff
                                      last edited by

                                      @Mastiff You need a static route on whatever 192.168.1.1 is—again, to route any traffic destined for the 192.168.6.0/24 subnet to use 192.168.1.53 as the gateway.

                                      tinfoilmattT M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • tinfoilmattT Offline
                                        tinfoilmatt @tinfoilmatt
                                        last edited by tinfoilmatt

                                        How else is 192.168.1.1 going to know that traffic destined for 192.168.6.0/24 needs to be routed to another router on its same LAN segment?

                                        Phrased another way—how is 192.168.1.1 going to know that the 192.168.6.0/24 network is "directly connected" to another router, 192.168.1.53, on its same LAN segment?

                                        Another way—how is 192.168.1.1 going to know to send traffic destined for 192.168.6.0/24 somewhere else, as opposed to sending it out the WAN where it routes all other traffic destined for networks it's not attached to?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M Offline
                                          Mastiff @tinfoilmatt
                                          last edited by

                                          @tinfoilmatt Aha, now I think I understand. OK, I'm in static routes, but it seems I need to add a Gateway for that. I'm a bit gunshy of doing that since I have no other way of connecting to my boat and other stuff at my summer home, and my wife has taken the car to visit our daugther. So in case I should lock myself out, I think I'll wait with that until I'm on the inside of that network next weekend. Thanks for the help so far, I will let this lie until Friday or Saturday.

                                          tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • tinfoilmattT Offline
                                            tinfoilmatt @Mastiff
                                            last edited by

                                            @Mastiff said in Can somebody help me get to Yamaha YNCA throug a pfSense?:

                                            I'm in static routes, but it seems I need to add a Gateway for that.

                                            Do it.

                                            Ensure the "Default gateway" dropdowns are set to something other than "Automatic".

                                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.