Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    CPU - higher single Core Speed vs Multi Core

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    7 Posts 5 Posters 8.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      aGeekhere
      last edited by

      Hi, Does pfsense favour higher single Core Speeds but less cores or slower single Core Speeds but more cores.
      Now this depends on your setup or requirements but let’s say the scenario is

      Users 10 (30 devices)
      Connection speed 100mbps
      Packages
      Openvpn
      Squid (with caching and proxy http,https)
      Snort

      Now let's compare two cpus (7700K vs 1800X)

      http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X/3647vs3916

      The 7700K has a much faster single core clock speed but the 1800X has a much faster total core speed.

      So which would be best for pfsense, more cores or faster single core speed?

      Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        Harvy66
        last edited by

        Without benchmarks for your specific use case, it's hard to say which is best, but my guess would be the quad core 4.2ghz. pfSense does make decent use of multi-core in many cases, but diminishing returns after 2-4 cores short of CPU bound work loads like many VPN tunnels.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kpa
          last edited by

          Packet filtering itself  is hard to make take advantage of parallel execution because of stateful filtering and because the traffic has to be processed in order. Other services such as DNS resolvers etc. running on the router/firewall benefit more from multiple cores.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • SammyWooS
            SammyWoo
            last edited by

            Whatever u do, just don't do it like that guy LinusTech in youtube, overkilled it with dual-xeon octo-core something but end up burning through 3 motherboards before giving up.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stephenw10S
              stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
              last edited by

              At 100Mbps both of those would be mostly idling! I doubt you could tell the difference between them.

              Steve

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                aGeekhere
                last edited by

                @SammyWoo:

                Whatever u do, just don't do it like that guy LinusTech in youtube, overkilled it with dual-xeon octo-core something but end up burning through 3 motherboards before giving up.

                But going with my original question, higher single core speed vs more cores it looks like even though the dual-xeon octo-core has more total compute power pfsense would better utilize a cpu with higher single core speed.

                another example

                CPU 1

                2 cores @ 2GHZ

                CPU 2

                8 cores @ 1GHZ

                Looks like the higher single core CPU will outperform the one with more cores and total compute power.

                Never Fear, A Geek is Here!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  There are still some processes in pfSense that are thread-locked or do not scale well across cores and those benefit from faster CPU speed.

                  If you run a number if things though, VPN, snort, squid etc, those can use separate cores so you would some benefit there.

                  The sweet spot there depends what you're running but 4 fast cores is pretty good for a default setup.

                  Steve

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.