Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    XG-7100 Setup problems

    Official Netgate® Hardware
    4
    6
    1.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      atteast
      last edited by

      Found some annoying problems setting up an XG-7100. For starters, is anyone experiencing an error with the initial setup wizard not completing? Don't remember the exact error message, it returns a bright red web page with the error and renders the web interface useless. The only way i got around it was to reset it to factory from the console, then log in to the web interface and immediately go to System / Advanced / Firewall & NAT and change the Firewall Maximum Table Entries from 200000 to 500000.

      Another strange problem i'm experiencing is that when changing the WAN interface from DHCP to Static IPv4 after the setup wizard or tuning on or off the Reserved Networks (Block Bogon or private networks) the LAN no longer passes data to the WAN. Currently setting the XG-7100 up on my local network 192.168.5.x/24, then plan on moving it to a public network. Have set up other PfSense security appliances like this before and never experienced such a strange problem. Putting the settings back does not help. Spent countless hours combing through settings to no avail. The only way to get Internet connectivity back is to do a factory reset and start over.

      Is anyone else experiencing this? Is this happening because i'm running the WAN port via a local network?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User
        last edited by

        After you change to Static IPv4, is the address inside RFC1918 space?

        If yes, did you disable "Block private networks and loopback addresses" on the bottom of Interfaces > WAN?

        Missed that, if you run 'pfctl -d' from Option 8 in the shell, are you able to access the GUI then?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          atteast
          last edited by

          Did not try that. Don't recall the exact error. Resolved it by doing 4 - Reset to factory defaults and then before running the setup wizard, changed the Maximum Table Entries to 500000.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            Maximum table entries: That will be something that is not specific to the XG-7100.

            I run all of my lab gear on inside networks. DHCP, Static, IPv6, it all works (but no XG-7100s).

            The only way I can see that changing from DHCP to static would break connectivity is if the static configuration was incorrect.

            Spending countless hours going through the settings would probably not be as productive as spending a couple minutes taking and evaluating a packet capture to see what is really going on.

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              atteast
              last edited by

              Thank you for replying. Was under allot of pressure to get this installed. Ended up resetting to factory, and setting up from scratch with local static IP which worked perfectly.
              Still had to increase the Maximum table entries. Agree that this should not be hardware specific. have an SG-4860 and others that are working perfectly with the set default of 2000000 Maximum table entries.
              The XG-7100 is now installed in its new home and so far working perfectly. Updated to the new 2.4.3-RELEASE P1 and so far so good.
              Thank you for the excellent work.

              JeGrJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JeGrJ
                JeGr LAYER 8 Moderator @atteast
                last edited by JeGr

                @atteast If you're running WAN with IPv6 and/or have Bogons enabled to block on WAN, the next Bogon List Update (bogonsv6) will probably too large and crash those 200.000 entries. For a clean reload of rules etc. the table needs a size of double the count of entries and with bogonsv6 we are already near/around 100k entries. So that's why you can see the GIT commit to change the default from 200k to 400k in future releases :) But yeah, that's not device specific, all our devices/customers ran into that issue in early May.

                edit: my bad, I read 200k, not 2M as you wrote. That of course is more then enough :)

                Don't forget to upvote 👍 those who kindly offered their time and brainpower to help you!

                If you're interested, I'm available to discuss details of German-speaking paid support (for companies) if needed.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.