• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

State table size

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
2 Posts 2 Posters 9.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    boktor
    last edited by Nov 9, 2005, 10:34 AM

    Hi all,

    My company whant's a redundant router solution. I am verry interesting in the solution pfsense because the inplementation of connection syncrhonisation (pfsync). But when i look at the system overview i see at state table size 52/10000. Is this meaning that the maximal of states in pfsense is 10000? Because we have a large company, > 400 hosts is 10000 for a state table not enought.

    Has anybody experiance with a redundante cluster with carp and pfsync in a large company as seen on http://www.pfsense.com/mirror.php?section=tutorials/carp/carp-cluster-new.htm?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • B
      billm
      last edited by Nov 9, 2005, 2:02 PM

      @boktor:

      Hi all,

      My company whant's a redundant router solution. I am verry interesting in the solution pfsense because the inplementation of connection syncrhonisation (pfsync). But when i look at the system overview i see at state table size 52/10000. Is this meaning that the maximal of states in pfsense is 10000? Because we have a large company, > 400 hosts is 10000 for a state table not enought.

      10K states is the pf and pfSense default.  It can be changed in the advanced settings screen.

      @boktor:

      Has anybody experiance with a redundante cluster with carp and pfsync in a large company as seen on http://www.pfsense.com/mirror.php?section=tutorials/carp/carp-cluster-new.htm?

      Not with pfSense, but yes.  I've been running such a setup on OpenBSD 3.5 since it released, no complaints and am looking forward to my next upgrade (which will probably be OpenBSD 3.9, not pfSense).

      –Bill

      pfSense core developer
      blog - http://www.ucsecurity.com/
      twitter - billmarquette

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      2 out of 2
      • First post
        2/2
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
        This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
        consent.not_received