DHCPs assign wrong pools
-
yea bad news, but since you are oing to update Captive portal….
I wonder if it can supportt this features (with or withour RADIUS)
-Speed Control that is assosiated to the user account
-Port controll (like we want to black port 80 for username 'JDoe')
-Capture POP3 traffic and send infor so pepople know they need to login -
We are not changing anything for 1.0. It's too late in the release process. Sorry.
-
and when are u going to work on 1.1?
-
Soon, but its not being released for a long time.
1.0 is not even releasedl – its our priority.
-
too bad for me….. :-[
-
My suggestion is to get your "programmers" working on the situation to resolve the issue.
-
well I can do that too since the product is woking alredy, I think…
Can you give me the lisy of the modules that you are using?
-
Modules? Can you be specific?
You can see almost all of them from /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin/ if I am understanding you're request.
-
yea that what I needed… I will try to get everything I need it it will work I will get back and post you the copy....
-
Take a look here?
I think it is possible to have Captive portal for both interfaces but, only if all cables are luged in … for now...OPT3 is the Bridge0
-
Yes, thats is exactly what we have started refactoring in head.
Take a look at:
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/chngview?cn=9567
-
its hard fo for me to figure how your web configurator works…. never did anything that recice responses from comand prompts...
Is it possible to trick if_bridge to work in cenario that I described earlier? because it seams like if there is a way to make 2 interfaces to work as sort of a switch ... then I get everything I need... I think
-
Yeah, I think what you're on the right track by assign bridge0 as an interface.
Not exactly how we are doing it in head but it should work. What happens now (in 1.1) is that you assign a bridge group interfaces then bring the bridge group in as an interface (instead of bridge0 it would (show bridge group #0) or the name that you specify. Then the bridge group is an interface that can be assigned to captive portal, dhcp, etc.
-
ok, so what will happen if one cables of the bridge interface is removed?
all other interfaces go down? -
As of right now it appears so. The freebsd bridge porter/author is looking into this.. I brought it to his attention yesteday.
-
cool, then I hope that is going to be resolved…
So then I will keep playing woth captice portal now, since im gtting some problems there too...
-
What Captive Portal problems are you running into? Seems to work great for me.
-
yea it was warking fine for me too but then just stoped working..
Symptoms: When I open the web page it doesnt go anywhere… altough IP address and DNS is assigned properly. Also cant ping 4.2.2.2 (Major DNS)
I tryed to renew IP adress and nothing works...
I dont know what happaned, but now im sturting the config from defults, and I'll see if I can get the same problem
-
I just did everything from defult, but its not working now…
Here are my steps for captive portal:
1. Assign LAN2 (Sis2) the ip address 192.168.2.1
2. Add DHCP for LAN2, pool 192.168.2.10-192.168.2.100, DNS 4.2.2.2
3. Firewall rules for LAN2 Any to Any
4. Captive portal, for LAN2, all defults, Diabled MAC filteringWhtat did i do wrong?
-
Reboot the firewall. Captive portal doesn't always take effect do so some kernel wierdness.
