• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Inetd[273]: 19112/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
19 Posts 7 Posters 13.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ?
    Guest
    last edited by Jan 1, 2006, 7:26 PM

    Hi everybody and a happy new year  :)

    I just started to use pfsense and I have fresh pfsense beta1 installation and I have exactly the same problem. This is my setup:

    Dual PII 300 Mhz
    128 Mb RAM
    600 Mb hard drive (yes, I know it's small but enough for now)
    3 NIC (WAN, LAN and OPT1)
    pfSense 1.0-Beta 1

    and that's all. Just a basic install without any extra configuration.

    From m0nowall website I found documentation how to configure portforwarding for bittorrent. Documentation is here:

    http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/thirdparty-bittorrent.html

    and that's how I did it. Bittorrent works but that error message puzzles me. This is the exact error message:

    inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
    inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address

    I tried to change reflection to disabled but that didn't help and my /etc/inetd.conf is:

    ftp-proxy stream tcp nowait root /usr/lib/libexec/ftp-proxy ftp-proxy -D0 -m 55000 -M 57000 -t 180 -u proxy

    TIA

    –
    palo

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • S
      sullrich
      last edited by Jan 1, 2006, 9:20 PM

      When you see this message, please run ps awux | grep inetd and see if inetd is already running.  We may be trying to start it overtop the other running process.  Checks are there to look for this, but bugs happen.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by Jan 1, 2006, 9:44 PM

        ps awux | grep inetd

        root    6055  0.0  0.9  1436  1088  ??  INs  4:58PM  0:00.43 /usr/sbin/inetd -a 127.0.0.1 /var/etc/inetd.conf
        root    13299  0.0  0.8  1456  952  p0  RL+  11:29PM  0:00.01 grep inetd

        Is that /var/etc/inetd.conf correct ? Should it be /etc/inetd.conf ?

        ls -l /var/etc/inetd.conf

        ls: /var/etc/inetd.conf: No such file or directory

        ls -l /etc/inetd.conf

        -rw-r–r--  1 root  wheel  108 Dec 26 05:18 /etc/inetd.conf

        Btw, it happens every 10 minutes:

        Jan 1 23:18:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 23:18:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 23:18:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 23:18:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 23:08:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 23:08:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 23:08:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 23:08:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 22:58:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 22:58:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 22:58:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
        Jan 1 22:58:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address

        –
        palo

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sullrich
          last edited by Jan 1, 2006, 9:51 PM

          @palo:

          ps awux | grep inetd

          root    6055  0.0  0.9  1436  1088  ??  INs  4:58PM  0:00.43 /usr/sbin/inetd -a 127.0.0.1 /var/etc/inetd.conf
          root    13299  0.0  0.8  1456  952  p0  RL+  11:29PM  0:00.01 grep inetd

          Is that /var/etc/inetd.conf correct ? Should it be /etc/inetd.conf ?

          Nope.

          ls -la /var/etc/inetd.conf

          -rw-r–r--  1 root  wheel  17949 Dec 31 23:15 /var/etc/inetd.conf

          @palo:

          ls -l /var/etc/inetd.conf

          ls: /var/etc/inetd.conf: No such file or directory

          ls -l /etc/inetd.conf

          -rw-r–r--  1 root  wheel  108 Dec 26 05:18 /etc/inetd.conf

          Btw, it happens every 10 minutes:

          Jan 1 23:18:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 23:18:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 23:18:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 23:18:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 23:08:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 23:08:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 23:08:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 23:08:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 22:58:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 22:58:51 inetd[6055]: 19000/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 22:58:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address
          Jan 1 22:58:51 inetd[6055]: 19001/tcp: bind: Can't assign requested address

          –
          palo

          Every 10 minutes!?  I don't see how this is possible.  Do you not have any redirects in place?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jeroen234
            last edited by Jan 2, 2006, 6:59 AM

            in /var/etc there is no inetd.conf

            ls -la /var/etc/

            total 30
            drwxr-xr-x  3 root  wheel  512 Jan  2 03:44 .
            drwxr-xr-x  12 root  wheel  512 Dec 27 09:54 ..
            -rw-r–r--  1 root  wheel    17 Jan  2 03:44 defaultdomain.conf
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    55 Jan  1 15:44 dhclient_wan.conf
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  321 Jan  1 15:44 dhcpd.conf
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  103 Jan  1 15:44 hosts
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  5115 Jan  1 15:44 lighty-webConfigurator.conf
            drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  512 Dec 27 10:12 mpd-vpn
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    43 Jan  2 03:44 nameserver_vr0
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    43 Jan  2 03:44 nameservers.conf
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  192 Jan  2 03:44 resolv.conf
            -rw-------  1 root  wheel    0 Jan  2 03:44 sasyncd.conf
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    0 Jan  1 15:44 slbd.conf
            -rw-rw-rw-  1 root  wheel  850 Dec 29 23:08 snmpd.conf
            -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  836 Jan  1 15:44 syslog.conf

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by Jan 2, 2006, 2:20 PM

              Today I recreated that bittorrent portforwarding rule which I made yesterday and it seems that problem is gone. I don't have any idea what might cause that error message but everything seems to work ok right now. Well, I still don't have /var/etc/inetd.conf file but if everything works, I don't care.

              –
              palo

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                Dakhor
                last edited by Jan 3, 2006, 11:57 PM Jan 3, 2006, 11:54 PM

                I got the same error on a fresh installation of 1beta. Disabling reflection didnt help - deleting all NAT and Firewall rules didnt help ( didnt reboot though ). Finally I made a new  NAT port forward rule ( and the auto firewall at the same time ) AND rebooted the system. Problem went away…

                The only thing that I did differently the first time was that after creating the port forward rule...

                1 - I forgot that I needed UDP protocoll too so edited the NAT rule AND firewall rule to include that.
                2 - Edited them again a second time to remove ip and ad an Alias instead.

                How about the other guys who got this error message and then made it go away by making a fresh new rule. Maybe there is a bug with EDITING rules. I will try and mess with it some more tomorrow to see if I can get the error back. Need to hit the sack now though :)

                /DaK/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  sullrich
                  last edited by Jan 4, 2006, 12:03 AM

                  This is hopefully fixed in beta 2.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    Dakhor
                    last edited by Jan 4, 2006, 12:15 AM

                    Now im getting something like this when running torrent software "inetd[348]: accept (for 19000): Software caused connection abort" but I suspect this is cuz I have forwarded one port only and torrents want a number of them to work well…

                    Anyway I wanted to ask what log readers you guys are using?

                    /DaK/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      Snille
                      last edited by Mar 12, 2006, 2:31 PM

                      I also (still, after a clean install and setting up all the rules again) get the same error.
                      inetd[366]: accept (for 19000): Software caused connection abort

                      Are you sure this is due to only forwarding one port for torrent even when the torrent program says it only needs one?

                      If you can't find it, make it and share it!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        sullrich
                        last edited by Mar 12, 2006, 3:57 PM

                        Click System -> Advanced -> Disable Reflection

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          Snille
                          last edited by Mar 12, 2006, 6:09 PM

                          Isn't the "reflection" the function in the firewall that let "me" (inside the lan) surf to my own dns name without having to actually go out and back in again (or to be in need of a host file, or an internal DNS)?

                          Anyway, is this a serious error? Or just an annoying thing filling up the log? :)

                          If you can't find it, make it and share it!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            sullrich
                            last edited by Mar 12, 2006, 6:24 PM

                            Yes that is the function that allows you access it from internal.  It looks like something is connecting and aborting the connect often.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                              [[user:consent.lead]]
                              [[user:consent.not_received]]