Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Thank you!

    Routing and Multi WAN
    3
    8
    5.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • U
      usk
      last edited by

      I finally got arround to try and loadbalance my 2 X 2048 adsl connections, and this is just too cool!

      pfSense rocks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N
        namezero
        last edited by

        How about failover?

        Does FTP / HTTP / SSH / PING / etc works when WAN is down, and OPT1 is up?

        If so, mind posting your detail configuration (except the real IP addresses)? Thanks.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • U
          usk
          last edited by

          I haven't tested it with WAN down yet, but I sure will.
          ftp in passive mode never really worked also not before I added load balance, never really got arround to figuring out why.

          I'll test with wan down tihis weekend and let you know if it works or not :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • U
            usk
            last edited by

            Failover didn't work that well after unplugging the wan :(

            When trying to ping yahoo.dk (217.12.3.11 that I also use as monitor IP) it only worked every second time, from both linux and windows.
            The http download also didn't failover.

            print screen of tests: http://server.cybersite.dk/wan_down/

            should I have done anything on the clients or on pfSense for failover to work?

            my setup is like this

            pfSense Version  RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_04-03-2006 built on Thu Mar 2 04:23:07 UTC 2006

            isp (dhcp) –> cheap router 10.42.1.1 DMZ -> static 10.42.1.2 OPT1 pfSense
            isp (dhcp) x-> cheap router 10.42.2.1 DMZ -> static 10.42.2.2 WAN  pfSense LAN 192.168.1.1 -> (dhcp) clients

            (x = where I broke the connection to test failover)

            I just noticed that my Load Balancer Pool says
            name = load_balance

            Servers/Gateways =
            10.42.1.1|217.12.3.11
            10.42.2.1|217.12.3.11

            but Monitor is empty ? shouldn't 217.12.3.11 be in there ?
            also if I click edit on the pool "list" is empty like I would have to add everything again?

            I have enabled advanced outbound NAT, adding " WAN 192.168.1.0/24 ***** NO" and "OPT1 192.168.1.0/24 ***** NO"

            In the firewall rules under LAN I added a rule for outgoing SMTP using 10.42.1.1 as gateway (I need that) and I change the gateway on the default LAN rule to "load_balance" (my pool from above).

            everything seems to work very nicely as long as both WAN's are up.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N
              namezero
              last edited by

              Blah so you've no luck as well on failover.

              Humm… in older snapshots one had to enter static routes to force "monitor pings" going through the correct gateway.
              Search in this sub-forum with keyword "gateway" or "static route" and you should see how others did that.

              Also newest snapshot is at 04-12. Maybe that will give you better luck as well.

              If all fails, at least submit a bug report about pool edit "empty list bug" that you've mentioned.

              (yeah yeah yeah I should try it myself as well... don't have time yet)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • U
                usk
                last edited by

                I only tested it because you asked me to.

                Failover isn't that important to me, so I'm not going to use a lot of time trying to make it work.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  namezero
                  last edited by

                  @usk:

                  I only tested it because you asked me to.

                  Failover isn't that important to me, so I'm not going to use a lot of time trying to make it work.

                  Oh opps… sorry I didn't mean to ask you to test it just for me. Thank you though.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sullrich
                    last edited by

                    Guys – monitoring is currently broken.  We're working on a fix.  This should be set to go in Beta 3 which is scheduled for release tomorrow but this issue may push us back to Sunday.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.