Read everything still no success
-
Yeah I know, I know .. RTFM … I read everything can't figure it out.
lan = 192.168.1.253
wan = 202.37.230.93 (pppoe)
opt1 = 203.96.212.68Firewall->NAT->Outbound Int Source Source Port Dest Dest Port NAT Add NAT Port Static Port OPT1 192.168.1.0/24 * * * * * NO WAN 192.168.1.0/24 * * * * * NO Services->Load Balancer Name Servers/Gateways Port Monitor Description LoadBalancetoWAN 202.37.230.93/210.48.22.38 203.96.212.1/203.96.212.1
Note:
In the wiki it says
"in the IP box type in the IP address of the gateway (this has to be one of the gateways configured at WAN or OPTx's)"I read this to mean use the gateway IP rather than the interface IP .. was I right?
Firewall->Rules->LAN Proto Source Port Dest Port Gateway * LAN Net * * * *
So to my knowledge everything should be setup correctly.
so a quick test.links -source http://www.whatismyip.com | grep -i TITLE\> | sed "s/<title>//I" | sed "s/<\/title>//I" | sed "s/WhatIsMyIP.com\ -\ //"<br />202.37.230.93<br /></pre><br />I would expect the ip to change every now and then .. but it has never changed<br /><br />Can some one point out what I am doing wrong?<br /><br />Thanks<br />Paul.<br /></title>
-
Yeah, use the gateway pool you created as your gateway. In this case, in your rule, select the "LoadBalancetoWAN" gateway.
–Bill
-
if I change firwall->rules->LAN
and change the gateway to LoadBalanceToWAN everything stops working.
completely :(I can still do Diagnose->ping->ping IP via interface
but from inside my lan I can't do anythingI suspect it has something to do with this
LoadBalancetoWAN 202.37.230.93/210.48.22.38
203.96.212.1/203.96.212.1perhaps it doesn't like doing this with a pppoe connection because the default route and int ip are the same?
-
Hmmm, what version are you running? The load balance pools screen you copy/pasted looks wrong - looks old. I bet you're running into bugs that have since been fixed. Run "cvs_sync.sh releng_1" from the shell to update to the latest cvs code if you're on a full install or wait until 1.0RC1 releases (hopefully it'll be in the next day or two - already versioned in CVS).
–Bill
-
running beta2 on DOM
will the config be seamless?
can I install on another DOM … boot, then load my saved config
I assume the config defines interfaces rules, ipsec settings, static routes .. everything -
Restoring config should work but I recommend to recreate the loadbalancing pool if it doesn't.
-
running beta2 on DOM
will the config be seamless?
can I install on another DOM … boot, then load my saved config
I assume the config defines interfaces rules, ipsec settings, static routes .. everythingno idea what DOM is, but you can restore your config.xml from beta2 to a beta4 or RC1 box. You will want to remove the load balancer config and recreate it. There were MAJOR load balancer fixes after beta2
Beta 3 summary: http://hitormiss.ucsecurity.com/index.php/2006/04/17/pfsense-10beta-3-is-out/
Beta 4 changelog (on vacation, I didn't write a summary): http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/rptview?rn=24
RC1 changelog (not yet released): http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/rptview?rn=25–Bill