OpenVPN and 1.0-BETA1
-
Aside from the route-up issue above, and the fact that I have to keep manually removing that zero, your patch is functioning well. I guess I get to go code-digging to find where that zero is being generated and comment it out…
EDIT: Found it. /etc/openvpn.inc, line 420/1500
Originally:
$ovpn_config .= "secret {$g['vardb_path']}/ovpn_srv_psk_{$tun}.pem 0\n";Copied that line, commented out the first and removed the space and zero from the end of the line.
Also on line 991, did the same thing:
$ovpn_config .= "secret {$g['vardb_path']}/ovpn_cli_psk_{$tun}.pem 0\n";That should resolve that problem. The only other thing that comes to mind is flag –log /var/log/openvpn_tunx.log should be created instead of what is there now, which is just "openvpn statistics".
-
Just a head's up. The inability to place a route-up statement in expert mode is a bigger problem than I thought. What happens is that if you define a static route to work around the issue, is that if for some reason your tunnel is not up, you'll start getting arplookup x.x.x.x is not on local network errors, as the route gets assigned to something other than tunx (since it doesn't exist).
So that's no good. It looks as though we need either temporary privelege escalation, or stop running as nobody and run it as root (eep!!!!).
-
….and there's more. It seems that rules don't like to have "TUNx Network" chosen as a source or destination in a rule, as the variable does not resolve itself correctly:
# cat /tmp/notices a:1:{i:1143065694;a:5:{s:2:"id";s:11:"filter_load";s:6:"notice";s:328:"There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:143: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:144: syntax error pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded The line in question reads [143]: pass in quick on $TUN0 from /30 to 10.10.101.0/24 keep state label "USER_RULE: Allow all traffic from tunnel to Shadwick Home." ";s:3:"url";s:0:"";s:8:"category";s:13:"Filter Reload";s:8:"priority";i:1;}}pass in quick on tun0 from /30 huh? :P That should be the IP address of tun0, which in this case would be 10.0.2.1/30 (I think that's right. It hits a piece of subnetting screwy-ness in my brain. /32 allows no subnet bits for the network. /31 steals 1 bit for the network, and /30 steals 2 host bits. I'm not sure what the practical difference in a subnet situation there is between /32, /31, and /30. /29 is the first subnet mask that begins to make any sense, giving you 4 host bits for the network, 1 for network, 1 for broadcast, and 2 hosts…).
Long story short, we have a variable that doesn't get resolved someplace.
-
Well this sucks. Even with the patch above, we have a problem with not having root permissions and adding/removing route information:
Mar 23 03:40:04 openvpn[9162]: event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
Mar 23 03:40:04 openvpn[9162]: event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
Mar 23 03:40:04 openvpn[9162]: ERROR: FreeBSD route delete command failed: shell command exited with error status: 77
Mar 23 03:40:04 openvpn[9162]: ERROR: FreeBSD route delete command failed: shell command exited with error status: 77
Mar 23 03:40:04 openvpn[9162]: SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting
Mar 23 03:40:04 openvpn[9162]: SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exitingThis came up after a rules reload. Grr…..
EDIT: Scratch that. I failed to copy a file correctly. All is well with the above patches, save for route-up statements. Any suggestions on how to get those working would be much appreciated!
-
Just poking my head in to say that the above patches are indeed stable. I've been running on them for 5 days, reboots included, without issue.
I've been putting my brain to the task of getting the route-up statements to run with escalated privs, without success. Perhaps we add form fields in the setup pages for adding additional routes and create and tear down routes outside of OpenVPN, but one would think you could do this without re-inventing the wheel, no?
-
…and I think I've found my issue. --route-up isn't the command I want. From the OpenVPN 2.1 man pages:
--route network/IP [netmask] [gateway] [metric] Add route to routing table after connection is established. Multiple routes can be specified. Routes will be automatically torn down in reverse order prior to TUN/TAP device close. This option is intended as a convenience proxy for the route(8) shell command, while at the same time providing portable semantics across OpenVPN's platform space. netmask default -- 255.255.255.255 gateway default -- taken from --route-gateway or the second parameter to --ifconfig when --dev tun is specified. The default can be specified by leaving an option blank or setting it to "default". The network and gateway parameters can also be specified as a DNS or /etc/hosts file resolvable name, or as one of three special keywords: vpn_gateway -- The remote VPN endpoint address (derived either from --route-gateway or the second parameter to --ifconfig when --dev tun is specified). net_gateway -- The pre-existing IP default gateway, read from the routing table (not supported on all OSes). remote_host -- The --remote address if OpenVPN is being run in client mode, and is undefined in server mode.So I've been using the wrong command altogether. On both sides. D'oh. :\
So I'll give this a whirl and see how it goes.
-
That did it. Man I'm an idiot. :P
It would probably behoove us to provide an interface for adding additonal routes on a per-tunnel basis from the OpenVPN config pages.
One little request to the more php-literate amongst us…would it be possible to use the Description field as the name that appears in the firewall rules and elsewhere in the interface as opposed to TUN0, or TAP0, etc? My clients are used to being able to name tunnels (from my dirty hack back at christmas) and like the ability to do that. Just wondering. ;)
-
Note as of April 8th snapshots OpenVPN has been replaced with a completely rewritten version done by Fernando Lemos.
Please test!
-
Note as of April 8th snapshots OpenVPN has been replaced with a completely rewritten version done by Fernando Lemos.
Please test!
I successfully configured a site to site vpn using openvpn pfsense was the "client" and was a natted box,
here are my notes:
VPN->OPENVPN-Client
Chose UDP as protocol and select the appropriate value for remote server and remote port
choose PKI as authentication method and past ca certficate and client certificate and key
select lzo-compression
and add the following to the custom options:
dev tun; ifconfig 10.1.0.2 10.1.0.1; tls-client; user nobody; group nobody; persist-tun; persist-key; verb 3
on the other box (linux in my case) I have the following config file:
dev tun
ifconfig 10.1.0.1 10.1.0.2
up /etc/openvpn/office.up
tls-server
dh /usr/share/openvpn/easy-rsa/keys/dh1024.pem
ca /usr/share/openvpn/easy-rsa/keys/ca.crt
cert /usr/share/openvpn/easy-rsa/keys/server.crt
key /usr/share/openvpn/easy-rsa/keys/server.key
push "route 192.168.66.0 255.255.255.0"
port 1194
user nobody
group nogroup
chroot /etc/openvpn/chroot
comp-lzo
ping 15
ping-restart 45
ping-timer-rem
persist-tun
persist-key
verb 3in office.up I setup routing
You need a firewall rule to allow vpn traffic, I add a new interface called and assigned tun0 to it, you can give an arbitrary ip address, the right ip address will be assigned when openvpn come up and finally add a pass all rule on this new interfaces,
reboot pfsense box and it works!
I'm not sure if the way I choiche to allow vpn traffic is the best one, however it works for me. Do you think there are alternative/best way to allow vpn traffic?
If I setup another pfsense box and configure a cluster, I have to disable openvpn tunnel on the backup node, would be useful a way to have failover also for openvpn,
thanks for pfsense,
regards
drakkan -
That's great drakan, I'm gonna try it out now. Tried it on friday and the firewall hang. I needed to restore to factory defaults because webconfigurator wasn't reachable through any of the interfaces.
Thanks again for your tests.
BTW: what version where you running? RC1a?