Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    UPnP support

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Expired/Withdrawn Bounties
    363 Posts 28 Posters 415.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      Skud
      last edited by

      I'm just wondering if there has been an update to this?

      I'd be willing to throw in a little cashola for this as well..

      UPnP would make my Pfsense box the perfect home firewall IMO..

      Riley

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sullrich
        last edited by

        No, I am affraid not.  Seth talked about working on it so maybe push him over the edge with a bounty :)

        It requires some c work, so it's not a trivial patch to bring to life.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Skud
          last edited by

          Unfortunately, things may be a little tight for a bit as I'm moving to a new place, but I would offer up $50. It's not much I'm afraid..

          So, uPnP support bounty is up to $150 now I guess.. :)

          Riley

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            databeestje
            last edited by

            I am currently having a poke at it. I require at least a week.

            Also, other upnp software came available that has no silly depencies which might make it easier to work on.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              databeestje
              last edited by

              I have some proof of concept code and was wondering if there are any testers available.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                Superman
                last edited by

                I'll try it out. Do you have a link or a file with some instructions?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  databeestje
                  last edited by

                  replace /etc/inc/system.inc with http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/system.inc
                  replace /etc/inc/filter.inc with http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/filter.inc
                  replace /usr/local/www/interfaces_lan.php with http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/interfaces_lan.txt
                  replace /usr/local/www/interfaces_opt.php with http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/interfaces_opt.txt
                  execute this command, fetch -o /usr/local/sbin/miniupnpd http://iserv.nl/files/pfsense/miniupnpd
                  execute this command, chmod +x /usr/local/sbin/miniupnpd

                  enable it on the lan interface.

                  Check the sytem logs.

                  Currently unsupported

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    Superman
                    last edited by

                    Okay, files updated, service enabled. Stuff is happening in the system logs when I open uTorrent or MSN Messenger. I'll have to close some of my presently opened & NATed ports and check it out…

                    Thanks!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      Superman
                      last edited by

                      Further testing seems to indicate that it's working properly.
                      I removed my NAT & Firewall Rules entries for uTorrent, enabled UPnP in the program, and it all worked!!
                      The port was opened when I opened the program.
                      And it seemed to be closed after I exited the program as indicated from a external port probe.

                      It passes these simple tests anyway!

                      Thanks again!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        Superman
                        last edited by

                        Minor update.

                        I did see this one error in the logs. It doesn't seem to stop it from working, but just for completeness here it is.

                        miniupnpd[46767]: /dummy not found, responding ERROR 404
                        
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          databeestje
                          last edited by

                          That's a feature. No fix for that. The computer is requesting something from the daemon which it does not comprehend.

                          Nice hearing that it appears working.

                          It does need further fixing though. It currently does not remove the firewall rules, only the port forwards to the inside host. I hope to fix that at a later time.

                          Cheers.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            Superman
                            last edited by

                            Cool!!

                            It would be nice to have it as a package even in this state so we won't lose it across updates!
                            Plus it would be easier to install!  ;) Not that it's terribly difficult, but… :D

                            It may not be the best feature in a corporate environment, but it sure is nice in a small home/office setup!

                            Thanks for your hard work so far!! :D

                            JC (aka Superman)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Skud
                              last edited by

                              Cool great!!

                              I'll have to give this a try and I'll let the OP (bradenmcg) know there has been progress as he is at the desk next to me.. :)

                              Riley

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                databeestje
                                last edited by

                                It appears this wil be going into base instead of a package although that is still up for discussion

                                It does make sense for some corporate workplaces though. If you have a lot of skype and videoconferencing then upnp is a good solution and far more granular then opening port ranges or creating static port ranges with static IP's.

                                A socks proxy is even worse because then you can tunnel anything in and out.

                                Cheers,

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • N
                                  nsumner
                                  last edited by

                                  Can you see what has been opened by UPNP? IE can a corporate firewall administrator who in a fit of insanity allows uPnP at least see what is going on with it?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    databeestje
                                    last edited by

                                    Not yet.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D
                                      databeestje
                                      last edited by

                                      pfctl -aminiupnpd -sr
                                      pfctl -aminiupnpd -sn

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        Jonb
                                        last edited by

                                        I have tested it and I think I have gone wrong some ware because I get this

                                        XML error: not well-formed (invalid token) at line 99

                                        Hosted desktops and servers with support without complication.
                                        www.blueskysystems.co.uk

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • D
                                          databeestje
                                          last edited by

                                          That's very interesting. I have not seen that happen on 3 different hosts I tried it on.

                                          What does the config.xml look like at line 99?

                                          It should (probably)  be in the interfaces, lan section
                                          Which should have a <enableupnp>tag.</enableupnp>

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • J
                                            Jonb
                                            last edited by

                                            well I have just tryed it on my other PFsense box and it works.  Hmm I must of broken something when I was playing around.

                                            Hosted desktops and servers with support without complication.
                                            www.blueskysystems.co.uk

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.