Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    MTU not changeable & RRD: WAN :: Quality

    Hardware
    3
    7
    3.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jahonixJ
      jahonix
      last edited by

      I have installed pfSense on 2 completely different systems with the same unwanted behaviour.
      The MTU for PPPoE on WAN is not changeable for all interfaces on both machines.
      Neither manually nor automatically by pfSense for PPPoE

      One has 3 Intel NICs whereas the other has 3 Realteks.

      System with Intel NICs
      fxp0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500
      options=48 <vlan_mtu,polling>inet6 fe80::230:5ff:fe09:897e%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
      ether 00:30:05:09:89:7e
      media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
      status: active
      fxp1: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500
      options=48 <vlan_mtu,polling>inet 192.168.2.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
      inet6 fe80::250:8bff:feb2:a627%fxp1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
      ether 00:50:8b:b2:a6:27
      media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
      status: active</full-duplex></vlan_mtu,polling></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></vlan_mtu,polling></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>

      System with Realtek NICs
      rl0: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500
      options=48 <vlan_mtu,polling>inet6 fe80::210:f3ff:fe03:4cc3%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
      ether 00:10:f3:03:4c:c3
      media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP)
      status: active
      rl1: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500
      options=48 <vlan_mtu,polling>inet 192.168.100.99 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255
      inet6 fe80::210:f3ff:fe03:4cc2%rl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
      ether 00:10:f3:03:4c:c2
      media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
      status: active</full-duplex></vlan_mtu,polling></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></vlan_mtu,polling></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>

      And I get this for WAN::Quality in RRD graph. On both systems. 100% loss isn't too bad, is it?  ;D

      status_rrd_graph_img.php.png
      status_rrd_graph_img.php.png_thumb
      status_rrd_graph_img.php.png_thumb

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        hoba
        last edited by

        You don't see the MTU settings for the PPPoE interface on this output. For PPPoE the used interface is ng0. The real nic will stay at 1500. Is your WAN gateway actually pingable? Some won't respond to pings which will lead to this graphs. You can override the RRD gateway with a hidden config.xml setting ( see http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=10&id=38&artlang=en&highlight=hidden )

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jahonixJ
          jahonix
          last edited by

          Yes, WAN is pingable.
          I am using it ATM.

          If your admin role enables you to see my IP then go for it and ping it from WAN side.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            hoba
            last edited by

            Your WAN Gateway (ISP Gateway) has to be pingable, not your WAN.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Y
              yoda715
              last edited by

              If you are running Snort put the WAN Gateway into your whitelist. I had your problem as well when I didn't have my Gateway entered into my whitelist.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jahonixJ
                jahonix
                last edited by

                @hoba:

                For PPPoE the used interface is ng0. The real nic will stay at 1500.

                Got me, MTU for NG0 is set correctly:
                ng0: flags=88d1 <up,pointopoint,running,noarp,simplex,multicast>mtu 1492

                @hoba:

                Is your WAN Gateway (ISP Gateway) actually pingable? Some won't respond to pings which will lead to this graphs.

                Well, you are right as well here. It is a German Telekom DSL and their Gateway is not pingable.
                Is that usual behavior for T-Com?

                Thanks alot, going to dig through the hidden config.xml settings later on.</up,pointopoint,running,noarp,simplex,multicast>

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jahonixJ
                  jahonix
                  last edited by

                  OK, tried to locate a default config.xml with hidden features from the FAQs link.
                  The link in there (http://pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/conf.default/config.xml?rev=1.19;content-type=text%2Fplain) is broken and I am not smart enough to locate it on my own.  :-\

                  From searching the forum I read that there were RRD issues in the recent past. Have they been solved so far? Most posts were affecting a pingable ISPs WAN gateway and not using the extra XML flag.

                  I have found hints on <use_rrd_gateway>and inserted it as follows:

                  @config.xml:

                  <pfsense><version>2.8</version>
                  <lastchange><theme>corporate</theme>
                  <system><use_rrd_gateway>217.5.100.222</use_rrd_gateway>
                  <optimization>normal</optimization>
                  …</system></lastchange></pfsense>

                  but still my WAN quality RRD graph shows 100% packet loss.
                  This might be due to the fact that -even after a couple of changes & reboots- the shell script updaterrd.sh still references my not pingable ISP's WAN gateway which is set dynamically by PPPoE on each connect:

                  @updaterrd.sh:

                  …
                  get_quality_stats_wan () {
                  packetloss_wan=100
                  roundtrip_wan=0
                  local out_wan
                  out_wan=ping -c 5 -q 217.5.98.186
                  if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
                  …

                  Any ideas on why <use_rrd_gateway>217.5.100.222</use_rrd_gateway> is not used?
                  Before experimenting with the config.xml I upgraded to: pfSense-Full-Update-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-02-09-2007.tgz

                  Thanks for your input (and this great software, of course!)</use_rrd_gateway>

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.