CP Status does not show usernames

alexus

hmm, so where would i look for the latest no bug version? and release version?

sullrich

RELENG_1 is the 1.0 release branch.. Which is what we are using for 1.0.*

alexus

ok where do i find it

who edited CP page? it doesnt look like original Jonthan's code…
I see it uses regular DB file + bandwith control is now what mono has its something diferent

sullrich

@alexus:

ok where do i find it

who edited CP page? it doesnt look like original Jonthan's code…
I see it uses regular DB file + bandwith control is now what mono has its something diferent

CVSWEB has everything you just asked for.

http://pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/

Linked from pfsense.com

alexus

well ok any way
I just run the CP in debug mode for accounting and it does confirm that accounting pakets are being send twise haveing identical data… the problem is that i looked at th e cript many times alredy and cant find duplicte calls ... maybe the author of modification can take a look? since afterall i dont know full alghorithm and im alredy fustrated

sullrich

@alexus:

well ok any way
I just run the CP in debug mode for accounting and it does confirm that accounting pakets are being send twise haveing identical data… the problem is that i looked at th e cript many times alredy and cant find duplicte calls ... maybe the author of modification can take a look? since afterall i dont know full alghorithm and im alredy fustrated

I've already looked at it and have no idea why its happening. If I knew, I would have fixed it.

alexus

lol

alexus

ok im gonna do dirty debuging on my release image, but then some one will have to give me original 1.0.1 CP files,, because i know .. after my debuging even if i find the proble the files will be coruped by hundreds of comments and debug switches

sullrich

@alexus:

ok im gonna do dirty debuging on my release image, but then some one will have to give me original 1.0.1 CP files,, because i know .. after my debuging even if i find the proble the files will be coruped by hundreds of comments and debug switches

Back up the files prior with tar.

alexus

its kinda too late alredy, I forgot on what parts i alredy enabled the debug mode :-(

sullrich

Well download the most recent snapshot and save it. It is 1.0.1 up until today.

alexus

like i have any idea where the snupshots are?

http://pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/usr/local/captiveportal/index.php?rev=1.37

is that a curent file?

sullrich

@alexus:

like i have any idea where the snupshots are?

http://pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/usr/local/captiveportal/index.php?rev=1.37

is that a curent file?

http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/

alexus

but those are disk images….
im doing development straight from WRAP so got not much ability for mounting and remounting... i just will need the clean file to put back in when I find the bug ( actually if i find it :-(

sullrich

You comment so quickly before checking something out.

These are upgrade files which are simply a tar backup!

alexus

yes i talk non stop :-P
thats why I have 1 PC jut for forums and AIM etc :-P

well the .img. confused me then

sullrich

Slow down, buddy. You also need to enable a spell checker.

http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/updates/pfSense-Full-Update-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-12-28-2006.tgz

alexus

ok thanks for the file link ;-)

spell cheker slows me down yes, but i dont like it

sullrich

@alexus:

ok thanks for the file link ;-)

spell cheker slows me down yes, but i dont like it

Half the time your unintelligible due to the amount of spelling typos.

One minute more of your time will save a minute off everyone that reads this thread!

alexus

ok i will write in Russian :-P
Now I’m having trouble with the drain in my house so have to stop at this point,
but so far i found that CP is not debugable :-( so maybe some one has any ideas how to debug it?

and also while reviewing the CP files i found tha accounting itself could be more specific.

Anyway as of now the only thing i know is that accounting script is called twice, this could be doe either by direct call (highly unlikely) or via user access authorization function that brings up the accounting. The user access authorization function is called 3 times 1) for MAC pass through and 2 other times a would assume a) for new access b) returning user

That’s it,,,, i dono what to do next