General hardware questions
-
pfSense needs at least 2 nics to run. in case you can't assign 2 it will stay at the preconfigured sis0/1 (which is preconfigured for soekris/wrap devices to work out of the box with no need to assign interfaces). This is not a bug. It's just because you can't assign 2 interfaces at your setup atm.
-
yes yes, understand…
thanks for ur personal reply regarding this matter.
just to confirm again, is pcmcia supported?
wouldnt want to bug my boss to get it in case it's not possible with this setup. would b great if my team can just get the laptop up for demo/trail. currently there isn't any desktop lying in the office. if we were to go on with the kit, it would mean getting a new pc, which would badly affect my stand in the team if it doesnt work.i m not a pro in networking, just a beginner. anyway, we r supporting software for clients. but not hardware n due to expansion, the wan access of our lan has gone haywire, with all sorts of funny usage which eat up bandwidth. it would b great if we could just setup pfsense n pin point which user is responsible.
-
i hv finally get a trail unit up n running with 1.0.1, with an onboard 10/100 n a xircom pcmcia lan card.
the configuration is a travelmate 528te laptop with p3 800, 256mb ram n 20gb hdd.
i m trying to get the latest snapshot into it as i read that the rrd graph is better.
however, i still hv 1 issue is one of the cards doesnt support altq or something, which makes traffic shapping not possible.onboard intel detected as: fxp0
xircom lan detected as: xe0
both at assign interface level. -
must be the xe driver as I know the fxp does support it. AltQ-support has to be build into the driver. not much that we can do about it. Besides trafficshaping everything will work though.
-
ur rite, everything seems to work.
then i guess i m out of luck with traffic shapping. anyway, if this trail machine does improve throughput while maintaining stable connection n speed, then i would request for a proper desktop system with realtek nics.
currently i will hv firewall on to do simple filtering n traffic monitoring.thanks!
-
Trafficshaping will improve things a lot when you hit high load conditions. So if you encounter problems with this and want to have a proof that trafficshaping will help you need another nic.
-
oic…
i thought it's possible to cut down traffic with strict firewall rules, or i should say, i disabled the default pass all rules n just add all the available sample destination port(within the drop down box) to the allow rules. on top of that i hv yahoo messenger n msn messenger port added into the firewall rules.
will hv to find a time to make the switch n generate traffic to see how things go.end of the day i will need traffic shaping n loadbalancing to do round-robin/fail over for 2 dsl lines that we hv currently. i read trafficshaping can only work for 1 interface, so i might tie the shaping to the main line.
-
That is right. currently you only can shape betwwen 2 interfaces (like LAN and WAN). Restricting unwanted traffic can help a lot of course too.
-
just to confirm, is realtek certified for shaping? or i will hv to get intel nics?
-
Intel is the way to go i think
-
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,16.msg35.html#msg35
rl == realtek though they might hit your cpu hard. If you really go for new equipement I recommend intel nics as well.
-
hi thanks for the help.
as of now, still trying to get everything basic up and will b going for a test run soon.
the biggest problem with the users now is torrents n worms/trojans lurking around the network.
thanks.