Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    P2P traffic not going into P2P queue

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    30 Posts 7 Posters 14.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      hoba
      last edited by

      Every tcp traffic causes ACKs. As bittorrent causes quite a lot of connections it will cause some ACKs as well. This is normal.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        pookguy88
        last edited by

        @hoba:

        Every tcp traffic causes ACKs. As bittorrent causes quite a lot of connections it will cause some ACKs as well. This is normal.

        sounds good, that's what i expected, thanks hoba ;)

        can I get in another quick question?

        the traffic shaping seems to work great most of the time but sometimes i have the following problem, i'll start my torrent and then my web traffic will just not respond. but if i reload the filters the web traffic is fine and will be fine for the remainder of the torrent. this doesn't seem to happen all the time either. it looks like all queues are catching the right traffic. my http traffic is set to qOthersH (up/down) and right now it's got about 30% bandwidth. is there anything i can do to alleviate this??

        sorry, turned out to be a pretty long question

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          hoba
          last edited by

          Are you running out of states? At the statuspage how many states do you see there (should be something like x/10000). The default setting is 10000 states but you can raise this limit depending on RAM at system>advanced (nearly at the bottom of the page).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            pookguy88
            last edited by

            @hoba:

            Are you running out of states? At the statuspage how many states do you see there (should be something like x/10000). The default setting is 10000 states but you can raise this limit depending on RAM at system>advanced (nearly at the bottom of the page).

            oh, i didn't know that… what exactly are states? like the number of connections?
            what will raising it do?

            edit: i have a P4 2.4 CPU and 512 RAM, how many states should I raise it to?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H Offline
              hoba
              last edited by

              First check if you hit the limit at status>system. States are current connection, right. Unless you run a lot of packages or packages like snort you can savely bump the limit up to 20000 or 30000. Question is if that makes sense for your connection depending on speed.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                pookguy88
                last edited by

                @hoba:

                First check if you hit the limit at status>system. States are current connection, right. Unless you run a lot of packages or packages like snort you can savely bump the limit up to 20000 or 30000. Question is if that makes sense for your connection depending on speed.

                I think I do hit the limit when I do torrents. I'll try this tonight, would it help if I used those m1,d,m2 values in my qOthersHdown queue (the one that my HTTP rule is tied to)?

                thanks so much for your help btw

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H Offline
                  hoba
                  last edited by

                  These values don't affect the statelimit. Btw, you can see historical logs of states at status>rrd graphs, system, states (if running a more recent snapshot). This graph was added some time ago.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    pookguy88
                    last edited by

                    @hoba:

                    These values don't affect the statelimit. Btw, you can see historical logs of states at status>rrd graphs, system, states (if running a more recent snapshot). This graph was added some time ago.

                    hmm, i don't seem to have that graph, i'm running the latest stable version: "1.0.1
                    built on Sun Oct 29 01:07:16 UTC 2006"

                    what do those values do then? they won't 'grab' states, because of priority, from the ones that are being used by P2P?

                    i'll check my states tonight, but i'm 99% sure my states were at the limit, i seem to recall that they might've even went over by a couple at times.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • H Offline
                      hoba
                      last edited by

                      This version doesn't have this graph. Just bump up the states to a higher value and check when your bt traffic started going. If you then see more than 10000 states used it most likely was your problem. The values if the trafficshaper only affect the bandwidth that is assigned to a queue but not the amount of states causing it.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P Offline
                        pookguy88
                        last edited by

                        Sounds good, I'll post back about how it went, thanks again hoba. you've been very helpful

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P Offline
                          pookguy88
                          last edited by

                          ok i'm back home and tried downloading a torrent, however, the torrent wasn't busy enough and didn't fill up my states so my surfing was fine… i think you were right about the problem of me running out of states, i think that's when my http traffic goes to sh1t. i will report back once i can do a proper test with a busy torrent.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Offline
                            pookguy88
                            last edited by

                            hi hoba,

                            well, it seems like the states thing wasn't the problem. I think the problem is that my qOthersDownH queue starts getting a lot of drops when th qP2PDown queue starts heating up… and therefore i think this causes all the delay on my http traffic. Again, this only happens when the torrent is really busy, any suggestions??

                            thanks

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • H Offline
                              hoba
                              last edited by

                              What does your ack queues look like when under load? Try bumping up the ack queue a few percentages. Acks shouldn't get dropped if possible.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P Offline
                                pookguy88
                                last edited by

                                my ack queues look fine under load… but i'll have another look tonight, i know my qwanacks queue is fine. not too sure how my qlanacks is, I remember that I bumped the qlanacks queue too much once and it choked everything so I had to bring it back down.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P Offline
                                  pookguy88
                                  last edited by

                                  yep, my ack queues were fine… my states were fine, like under 5000 the only thing that looked out of the ordinary was that the qOthersDownH queue had quite a few drops, like about 100 something...

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • P Offline
                                    pookguy88
                                    last edited by

                                    well, i tried moving the http rule to the top of the rule list… maybe that will make a difference... the P2P catch-all rule as at the bottom

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P Offline
                                      pookguy88
                                      last edited by

                                      hoba,

                                      I seem to have run into that slow down again tonight, what seems to be happening is my qOthersDownH queue doesn't seem to want to 'take' the bandwidth away from my qP2PDown queue when it's maxed. Like it's being blocked or something, it doesn't want to take it's percentage of the bandwidth… any suggestions?? thanks again

                                      edit: it seems when I reload my rules/queues it seems to clear up the 'blocking'.... like, the shaper works without hiccups when I reload the queues during a P2P download.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S Offline
                                        sullrich
                                        last edited by

                                        @pookguy88:

                                        hoba,

                                        I seem to have run into that slow down again tonight, what seems to be happening is my qOthersDownH queue doesn't seem to want to 'take' the bandwidth away from my qP2PDown queue when it's maxed. Like it's being blocked or something, it doesn't want to take it's percentage of the bandwidth… any suggestions?? thanks again

                                        edit: it seems when I reload my rules/queues it seems to clear up the 'blocking'.... like, the shaper works without hiccups when I reload the queues during a P2P download.

                                        Are you using miniupnp by chance?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P Offline
                                          pookguy88
                                          last edited by

                                          @sullrich:

                                          Are you using miniupnp by chance?

                                          nope… should I be?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S Offline
                                            sullrich
                                            last edited by

                                            Just checking.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.