• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

What do you want to see in the pfSense package system?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
69 Posts 54 Posters 81.9k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    czappi
    last edited by Oct 15, 2006, 10:36 PM

    Hi

    I hope the freenas package work that was fine.  :)

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • R
      rsw686
      last edited by Oct 17, 2006, 8:46 PM

      The package system as it stands is good, however the lack of documentation hinders development of additional packages by outsiders. I've found some documentation but nothing thats complete. Also some of the xml tags are confusing and not self explanatory.

      For example

      custom_add_php_command

      When does this command run. I read something that stated it runs after the package install, however it also runs when changing the settings on a package. So when is this section useful when using the custom_php_install_command and custom_php_resync_config_command fields. Seems it would just duplicate things.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        sullrich
        last edited by Oct 17, 2006, 9:09 PM

        php_add is run after a item is changed in the gui.

        resync runs on bootup, etc so that the rc.d files are setup from a fresh state (bootup).

        Yes the docs are hurting.  We hope to get them in better shape very soon.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          hoster
          last edited by Nov 10, 2006, 8:44 AM

          Hi,

          it would be nice to implement a timelimitpackage.
          I need to give users or Ip addresses access on a given hour.

          For example: (Ip address 1) on Monday-Fryday  between 9:00 and 11:00 pm
                            (Ip address 2) on Saturday between 2:00-3:00, and so on

          greetings, hoster :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            DarkX
            last edited by Nov 29, 2006, 4:05 AM

            trackerd(tracks MACs to IPs) would be nice
            http://freshmeat.net/projects/trackerd
            integrates into snortsam/snort or stand alone

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              tdi
              last edited by Dec 7, 2006, 1:26 PM

              Quagga/ospfd

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E
                ellisgl
                last edited by Jan 15, 2007, 11:42 PM Jan 15, 2007, 11:32 PM

                Routing protocols - OSPF - RIP
                64 Bit support..

                T1, T3 card support (digium and zapata, etc)
                BCP (http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/99nov/slides/pppext-bridge-99nov/)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  ben.suffolk
                  last edited by Apr 22, 2007, 1:52 PM

                  HI,

                  I'd quite like to see squidGuard for automatic URL filtering. With the ability to have the rules auto synced via rsync to squidguard.mesd.k12.or.us::filtering or similar.
                  Regards

                  Ben

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sanjay_arora
                    last edited by Jul 11, 2007, 9:45 PM

                    Hello

                    I would like some way (don't know if any package/script does this) to create an iso file of my pfsense install, so that when I boot with a CD created with that install, all the packages, rules, configurations etc. of my original configurations are pre-installed and when I install pfsense from that CD it simply recreates my original pfsense machine with no question asked.

                    Also, I would like to see pfsense store two-three copies of its configurations, so that if it loses its configuration file due to some sudden power-failure it can simply restore the configuration from the backup instead of giving a configuration file not found error and requiring a reinstall in some cases and configuration restore in some.

                    I would even place a bounty on it. Can someone tell me what needs to be done?

                    With regards.
                    Sanjay.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      cmb
                      last edited by Jul 12, 2007, 12:11 AM

                      @sanjay_arora:

                      Also, I would like to see pfsense store two-three copies of its configurations, so that if it loses its configuration file due to some sudden power-failure it can simply restore the configuration from the backup instead of giving a configuration file not found error and requiring a reinstall in some cases and configuration restore in some.

                      This is already fixed in 1.2. Both the issues that caused config corruption, and a backup config now exists as well.

                      @sanjay_arora:

                      I would like some way (don't know if any package/script does this) to create an iso file of my pfsense install, so that when I boot with a CD created with that install, all the packages, rules, configurations etc. of my original configurations are pre-installed and when I install pfsense from that CD it simply recreates my original pfsense machine with no question asked.

                      That's much more difficult, as build machines require files that don't exist in the actual installs. It's easy enough to install and restore your config (which also reinstalls your packages), and difficult enough to do this, that there wouldn't likely be any developer interest.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        sanjay_arora
                        last edited by Jul 12, 2007, 7:26 PM

                        That's much more difficult, as build machines require files that don't exist in the actual installs. It's easy enough to install and restore your config (which also reinstalls your packages), and difficult enough to do this, that there wouldn't likely be any developer interest.

                        Hmmm…well actually the idea was to recover from problems using a non-technical user especially in a geographically distant location, say  an accountant or clerk, who simply puts in a cd in a pfsense system which is configured to boot first from a cd drive.....choose 99, take the cd out, reboot and voila the system is back in its required state. I actually had to travel to a nearby city when I could not get a remote loginwith a SME client who did not have the vaguest idea of what a KVM switch was, nor could afford it.

                        However, I would not mind using the complete build system to create a customised cd for every pfsense box that I install. I am a BSD virgin....so what skills would be needed for doing this and how complicated is the job of creating a bsd box that would buils a pfsense iso with required configurations & packages. Such a system can import the system backup file and build the configurations and then generate an iso file.

                        With best regards.
                        Sanjay.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • I
                          IsNoGood
                          last edited by Oct 6, 2007, 4:19 AM

                          Well first post, so be gentle thanks

                          I'm looking into moving from ipcop to pfsense, some might say grow up, one thing that I seen and use that help me a lot over the years are
                          MC, Midnight Commander, did try to get a .tbz version, but kind of lost right now all BSD is new to me, and I get errors when I try to install, having a one version of MC in the add on system will be help for me to get better understanding of the BSD system.

                          On more thing that I'm missing is a version ULR filter the one in ipcop is from ( http://www.urlfilter.net/ ) works well

                          Thanks for your time, and a cool trunk of software

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Cry HavokC
                            Cry Havok
                            last edited by Oct 6, 2007, 6:43 PM

                            @IsNoGood:

                            On more thing that I'm missing is a version ULR filter the one in ipcop is from ( http://www.urlfilter.net/ ) works well

                            You can achieve something similar with Squid and blacklists.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • U
                              ugur
                              last edited by Apr 18, 2008, 7:20 PM

                              maybe av with quid.

                              -
                              Ugur.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                Joedirt
                                last edited by Jul 23, 2008, 12:12 PM

                                I would like to see pfsense handle hostheaders and nat them to the right internal server.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J
                                  jhon10ba
                                  last edited by Aug 27, 2008, 2:14 AM

                                  It would be perfect to have a package with the administration Mysql with graphics in PHP to integrate with the radius.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    si_faisal
                                    last edited by Sep 2, 2008, 11:37 AM

                                    samba server

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      Guest
                                      last edited by Sep 23, 2008, 9:10 AM

                                      First , i just want to thanks all freebsd & pfsense commiters & developers because pfsense & freebsd are hudge, I install it many times for entreprises and for myself but …

                                      • When a package is "stable" or released please do not erase it 4 month later...

                                      For example : The snort 2.6 package was very well working for me few month ago .... but there is no 2.6 snort anymore in the package system. I don't want to install 2.7 myself and add 2.8 files for each installation. Why have we a web interface ?  ( for newbies ...i know  :) ) I prefer an old version well working than a recent one that does not work or need manual adds. A versionning of packages releases could be very usefull for developers and users.

                                      • What i very would like is that PFsense could support official packages as (most usefull packages) : squid, squidguard & snort and others. I hope in the future, they will be integrated by defautl into pfsense but desactivated by default because of licence and/or installation platform ( soekris VS Quad core Xeon ..) and disks capacities ….

                                      Any comments are welcome, sorry for my "working" english
                                      Best Regards
                                      Nicolas

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • P
                                        Perry
                                        last edited by Sep 23, 2008, 9:45 AM

                                        • When a package is "stable" or released please do not erase it 4 month later…

                                        For example : The snort 2.6 package was very well working for me few month ago .... but there is no 2.6 snort anymore in the package system. I don't want to install 2.7 myself and add 2.8 files for each installation. Why have we a web interface ?  ( for newbies ...i know  Smiley ) I prefer an old version well working than a recent one that does not work or need manual adds. A versionning of packages releases could be very usefull for developers and users.

                                        Not that i know the snort story, but if it contains security holes or other bugs it should be fixed. If it's only enhancements it should be left alone.
                                        Another reason would of course be the underlying version of FreeBSD.

                                        • What i very would like is that PFsense could support official packages as (most usefull packages) : squid, squidguard & snort and others. I hope in the future, they will be integrated by defautl into pfsense but desactivated by default because of licence and/or installation platform ( soekris VS Quad core Xeon ..) and disks capacities ….

                                        As pfSense is a spare time project there is a limit to the amount of code the dev's can support. Next there is the hole license issue bsd vs gpl and last but not least the packages system gives the freedom to do what you want with it as a user.

                                        /Perry
                                        doc.pfsense.org

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • B
                                          bombording
                                          last edited by Nov 30, 2008, 1:36 PM

                                          samba server +1

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received