Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Small footprint box

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    29 Posts 8 Posters 11.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kapara
      last edited by

      Did you end up buying the FWA-710?  Looks interesting.  Did you get pricing on the unit?  Would be interested to know.

      Thanks

      Skype ID:  Marinhd

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        covex
        last edited by

        no… couldn't get through to sales rep there so i got myself nad-2081 http://portwell.com/products/detail.asp?CUSTCHAR1=NAD-2081
        nice unit. even though cmb was warning me about marvell chips it works fine. all 4 interfaces were recognized right out of the box.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          cmb
          last edited by

          covex: Interesting, keep us posted on how that box works out for you.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            covex
            last edited by

            ok… i installed this box in my office. using only 2 ports (lan and wan) out of 4 (sk0 sk1 sk2 sk3) at the moment. first test (transfer 40MB file inside vpn from remote site) gives me 4mbps (turbo dsl). if you wanna see something else, let me know what to run.
            for dmesg please see the attachment.

            dmesg.txt

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              covex
              last edited by

              looks like these marvell chips are not as bad as people saying  :)
              even though i found on the net tons of complains about them under *nix and windows mine are working Ok and also i got intel box here running as dc and it has marvell giga chip in there too. so i guess it's not the chip that bad it's just bad implementation of it done by asus and co.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                covex
                last edited by

                new update…  :)
                got wistron cm9 installed in the box. works greate! now my gateway/vpn server aslo acting as an ap.
                this pfsense is a realy greate pease of software!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • I
                  Issacsim
                  last edited by

                  Any idea on price?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    covex
                    last edited by

                    i paid ~$1100 for p4 2.8gzh, 512mb, 40gb hdd.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      cna
                      last edited by

                      First I want to apology for offtopic, but I jusg got curios.

                      @covex:

                      it's just bad implementation of it done by asus and co.

                      What you mean with that?
                      I have ASUS MB, with marvell giga LAN chip(I buy that in about 3years ago). I used it wit many different OS's and did not got a single mistake from it, even now I'm using that MB.
                      Never test it with PfSense, but with FreeBSD it OK, it must be the same situation in PfSense.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        covex
                        last edited by

                        maybe you just got lucky  :)
                        try to google marvell and freebsd or pfsense and you'll see how many people having issues with this chip out there. and most of them have asus mobos or something similar.
                        i'm not saying that asus is bad, i have tens of stations running on different asus mobos, but you have to agree that when it comes to comparing asus mobo and intel mobo i wouldn't bet on asus.

                        plus in my post i said "…i guess it's not the chip that bad it's just bad implementation of it done by asus and co…"
                        means imho  :)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          cna
                          last edited by

                          I don't think that I just got lucky. Biggest part of people who write those … are lazy.
                          Well enough with offtopics  ;)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.