Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Failover, 2 WAN, 2 LAN, each WAN for his dedicated LAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
    3 Posts 2 Posters 2.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      KiaN
      last edited by

      Hi,

      I want to do this "simple" setup: pfSense using my 2 WAN for 2 LAN in that manner:

      LAN1 -> WAN1 (except if WAN1 fails then -> WAN2)
      LAN2 -> WAN2 (except if WAN2 fails then -> WAN1)

      I read quite a few tutorials about how to achieve things that look like that but not precisely, so I wonder for my precise case which tutoriel you would recommand me.

      I can setup all this using 1 or 2 pfSense servers, this is not an issue.

      Thanks !

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        Perry
        last edited by

        From my own test a multiwan failover setup using 2 lan doesn't seem to be possible. This has however not been confirmed by any dev's

        If your are a home user you could drop the 2nd lan and save some power ( 1 watt cost around 2€ a year in Denmark ).
        http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/MultiWanVersion1.2
        Then assign a ip to wan1failoverwan2 and others to wan2failoverwan1

        For a company user a hardware failover setup makes more sense.
        http://olddoc.pfsense.org/index.php/Setting_up_CARP_with_pfSense

        /Perry
        doc.pfsense.org

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          KiaN
          last edited by

          Thanks for you advice,

          This installation is for 2 companies hosted in the same place. Right now we share the same Internet connection with a signle basic pfSense server, but now, we want to separate networks and WANs. However we still want to have either one to be able to fail over on the other one in case its WAN access fails.

          It is better automated, but if this needs to be operated manually, it's not really an issue.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.