Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Snort Updated to 2.7

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    65 Posts 17 Posters 48.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Y
      yozh
      last edited by

      It works and the rules seems to be downloading, but it takes a very long time to install them and it seems to be stuck in the middle of the install and then says that rules never were updated its cosmetic I belive at this time, but what happenes when it tried to auto update the rules ?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • AhnHELA
        AhnHEL
        last edited by

        Mine is working fantastic and i even used Morbus' edit to add the ac-bnfa mode to the Snort Settings Performance mode list.  Now if we could just get this Mozilla Browser Bug Fix committed, Snort would be working perfectly.

        AhnHEL (Angel)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Y
          yozh
          last edited by

          Hmm also the blocking doesnt seem to fully work. I see TCP portsweeps in the alerts but no blocked hosts and in settings the "Block offenders" is checked. Strange

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            shiftyjoe
            last edited by

            Hi all,

            Just switch to pfsense 1.2-RC3 from IP cop and I am having issues with the snort package.  I have installed the latest, 2.7.0.1_3 and I don't seem to be getting any alerts (which I know should be there, ipcop reported a number of hits per day)  I have snort running with the ac method and most of the rules selected.  Below is the log when I start snort.

            Dec 12 09:06:39 snort2c[21009]: snort2c running in daemon mode pid: 21009
            Dec 12 09:06:39 snort2c[21009]: snort2c running in daemon mode pid: 21009
            Dec 12 09:06:39 snort2c[20088]: SIGTERM received - exiting
            Dec 12 09:06:39 snort2c[20088]: SIGTERM received - exiting
            Dec 12 09:01:23 SnortStartup[20115]: Ram free BEFORE starting Snort: 402M – Ram free AFTER starting Snort: 822M -- Mode ac -- Snort memory usage:
            Dec 12 09:01:07 snort[19527]: ACSM-No Memory: acsmCompile!
            Dec 12 09:01:07 snort[19527]: ACSM-No Memory: acsmCompile!
            Dec 12 09:01:05 snort2c[20088]: snort2c running in daemon mode pid: 20088
            Dec 12 09:01:05 snort2c[20088]: snort2c running in daemon mode pid: 20088
            Dec 12 09:01:05 snort[20007]: Daemon parent exiting
            Dec 12 09:01:05 snort[20007]: Daemon parent exiting
            Dec 12 09:01:05 snort[20007]: Child exited unexpectedly
            Dec 12 09:01:05 snort[20007]: Child exited unexpectedly
            Dec 12 09:01:04 snort[20026]: FATAL ERROR: Failed to Lock PID File "/var/run//snort_fxp1.pid" for PID "20026"
            Dec 12 09:01:04 snort[20026]: FATAL ERROR: Failed to Lock PID File "/var/run//snort_fxp1.pid" for PID "20026"
            Dec 12 09:01:04 snort[20026]: PID path stat checked out ok, PID path set to /var/run/
            Dec 12 09:01:04 snort[20026]: PID path stat checked out ok, PID path set to /var/run/

            I am confused by the fatal error and the report of 402m of free memory before snort run… and 822m after it starts.  fxp1 is my wan nic.

            Any suggestions?

            Running pfSense with Celeron @966Mhz w/ 1gb ram, 80GB IDE/ATA Harddrive, and two intel desktop pro 10/100.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • AhnHELA
              AhnHEL
              last edited by

              I've gotten that type of error in the past.  X out any blocked IPs in the Blocked tab, Clear the log on the Alerts tab, and hit Save again in the Categories tab.  Also, if you're using a majority of the categories, read page 1 of this post on using ac-bnfa mode.  Mine craps out when using ac mode and using a lot of categories

              AhnHEL (Angel)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User
                last edited by

                Well snort did work ,Now it crashes pfsense .So i did a reinstall of pfsense and installed snort and tryed to update now i get this snort rules: md5 signature of rules mismatch.So i guess i will go back to my d-link . >:(

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  shiftyjoe
                  last edited by

                  onhel - Thanks for the help, changed to ac-bnfa and snort is much happier now.

                  cdx304 - "Well snort did work ,Now it crashes pfsense .So i did a reinstall of pfsense and installed snort and tryed to update now i get this snort rules: md5 signature of rules mismatch.So i guess i will go back to my d-link . Angry"

                  Not sure if it will help, but I've gotten this message.  After a fifteen minute wait, I could re download the rules without an issue.

                  Running pfSense with Celeron @966Mhz w/ 1gb ram, 80GB IDE/ATA Harddrive, and two intel desktop pro 10/100.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • AhnHELA
                    AhnHEL
                    last edited by

                    Yes, I have gotten the md5 mismatch a couple of times as well during the testing of Snort 2.7.0.1_1 and 2.7.0.1_2.  A second attempt to download rules always cleared up this error.

                    While I have this post up, I'd like to give my thanks to Sullrich for maintaining the package and Shaddow501 for his help to Sullrich in getting the problems with 2.7 resolved so quickly for all of us end-users.  Great job guys.

                    AhnHEL (Angel)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      rt_rex
                      last edited by

                      @onhel:

                      Yes, I have gotten the md5 mismatch a couple of times as well during the testing of Snort 2.7.0.1_1 and 2.7.0.1_2.  A second attempt to download rules always cleared up this error.

                      While I have this post up, I'd like to give my thanks to Sullrich for maintaining the package and Shaddow501 for his help to Sullrich in getting the problems with 2.7 resolved so quickly for all of us end-users.  Great job guys.

                      There is a 2.7.0.1_3 version working ok here

                      Don´t Try this @home go outside!
                      WIFI Link @ 76 km
                      Pfsense with 3G USB

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User
                        last edited by

                        Pfsense crashes now with snort installed .

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • AhnHELA
                          AhnHEL
                          last edited by

                          Define @cdx304:

                          Pfsense crashes now with snort installed .

                          Define "crash."

                          Please elaborate.

                          Mine is running great, possibly a hardware issue?

                          AhnHEL (Angel)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            shaddow501
                            last edited by

                            Hi All

                            After a few days working with snort i have found that it doesnt remove the blocked IP after 60 min, maybe it is something with the configuration i am nit sure yet.

                            i do think that should be a line in the cron configuration that after a specific time it removes the blocked IPs, or maybe i am wrong…

                            Did anyone notice that problem or is it just something messed up in my system.

                            anyway any information where i should write this line i will appreciate.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              shiftyjoe
                              last edited by

                              This post (http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,5902.0.html) is talking about how to change the time it take before the ip's are removed.

                              Sullrich says "You can change the reset time by modifying /cf/conf/config.xml from Diagnostics -> Edit File.

                              Look for the cron entry that runs the command /usr/local/sbin/expiretable -t 1800 snort2c.

                              Change the <minute>60</minute> to whatever you like.  Then go to Diagnostics -> Command Prompt and in the PHP command box issue the command:

                              configure_cron();"

                              I'ld check to make sure the cron job is schedualed.

                              Running pfSense with Celeron @966Mhz w/ 1gb ram, 80GB IDE/ATA Harddrive, and two intel desktop pro 10/100.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • AhnHELA
                                AhnHEL
                                last edited by

                                Watched a blocked IP and noticed it was removed after around 87 minutes.  Performed a second test and this one went beyond 115 minutes before I gave up on babysitting the GUI so I can confirm your experiences Shaddow501.  One thing I noticed while tinkering around with this is that "top" doesnt show snort2c running when an IP is blocked.  I can verify that the IP is in fact blocked so I can only assume snort2c is doing its job but strange that I dont see it running when I know I've seen snort2c by running Top in the past.

                                AhnHEL (Angel)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  shaddow501
                                  last edited by

                                  Hi OnHel

                                  Well i do think that the reason because snort crash (i do see strange line in my log that refer to snort exited core dump , well something like that, i do thing it isnt a very stable release, any way i am working on snort.inc file to see if by removing some items it will make snort work better…  (like the SMTP check that i have added and FTP processor that i have added, so far i have removed the SMTP and will try to check it for a few days to see if it will make the release more stale.
                                  if you would like to "play" also with the file then it is located at /usr/local/pkg/snort.inc (just use edit file in snort gui)

                                  also i did modification in cron that will remove the blocked ip after 10 min, and i guess it does work...

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    shaddow501
                                    last edited by

                                    Hi Guys

                                    I have started to work with snort version-2.8.0.1, since I didnt like much the 2.7.0.1, i have made a new package based on the snort 2.7.0.1 but with files of the new last version i mention above.
                                    In the terminal ssh software i just pkg_delete the old version and did pkg_add to my version.

                                    the new version seem to work so far, but i still not have much information of how stable it is.
                                    It also require a change in the snort.inc file.

                                    anyone that wish to try it may contact me

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T
                                      trendchiller
                                      last edited by

                                      Perhaps give scott a link if it runs fine ;-)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • AhnHELA
                                        AhnHEL
                                        last edited by

                                        Shaddow501, I've been studying the snort.inc file, and trust me I'm not in your league at all in understanding it, nor would I have been able to fix it the way you did previously when the preprocessors were causing Snort to crash.

                                        But I did notice that some alerts werent properly being set off.  For instance, ICMP pings to my WAN IP werent setting off a Snort Alert even though I have the same ICMP rules enabled as I did with 2.6

                                        Then I noticed that you had the preprocessor flow enabled in the snort.inc file.  According to this site http://cvs.snort.org/viewcvs.cgi/snort/doc/README.stream5?rev=1.2

                                        The Stream5 preprocessor is a target-based TCP reassembly module
                                        for Snort.  It is intended to replace both the stream4 and flow
                                        preprocessors, and it is capable of tracking sessions for both
                                        TCP and UDP.  With Stream5, the rule 'flow' and 'flowbits' keywords
                                        are usable with TCP as well as UDP traffic.

                                        Since Stream5 replaces stream4, both cannot be used simultaneously.
                                        Remove the stream4 and flow configurations from snort.conf when the
                                        stream5 configuration is added.

                                        I commented out the flow preprocessor and I'm now seeing ICMP ping alerts again.

                                        AhnHEL (Angel)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          shaddow501
                                          last edited by

                                          Hi OnHeL

                                          Well you are right, with the last version of snort 2.8.0.1 i did disable the flow preprocessor, i did compile the 2.8.0.1 that will also support stream4udp packets so it does work with both stream5 and stream4 configuration (but will not work together, you must select if you want to use stram4 or stream5 option)

                                          With the both versions (2.7.0.1 & 2.8.0.1) i still have a problem after some time  (could be hours and could be minutes) snort exit with this message:
                                          " (snort), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)"  I havent got any clue what could cause it and looking into web (google and such) didnt resolved much information…

                                          I am curious if it is just me that get this error or some of you do get it as well, if someone have got any clue how to debug it and  see what cause this fault i could have a bit more progress, but as for now i am kinda stuck with lack of information.

                                          I did try snort with almost all the working methods but again i do get the message and snort stop doing what it should be doing (blocking :))

                                          anyone?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C
                                            chazers18
                                            last edited by

                                            i have a Similar problem that some of the others are having with Snort

                                            version of PFsense

                                            1.2-RC2
                                            built on Fri Aug 17 17:46:06 EDT 2007

                                            Some of the goofy errors that i am getting with snort

                                            Dec 19 07:54:49 SnortStartup[63790]: Ram free BEFORE starting Snort: 73M – Ram free AFTER starting Snort: 73M -- Mode ac-std -- Snort memory usage:
                                            Dec 19 07:54:43 kernel: xl0: promiscuous mode disabled
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63624]: Daemon parent exiting
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63624]: Daemon parent exiting
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63638]: Daemon initialized, signaled parent pid: 63624
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63638]: Daemon initialized, signaled parent pid: 63624
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63638]: Writing PID "63638" to file "/var/run//snort_xl0.pid"
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63638]: Writing PID "63638" to file "/var/run//snort_xl0.pid"
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63638]: PID path stat checked out ok, PID path set to /var/run/
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63638]: PID path stat checked out ok, PID path set to /var/run/
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 kernel: xl0: promiscuous mode enabled
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63624]: Initializing daemon mode
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 snort[63624]: Initializing daemon mode
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 kernel: xl0: promiscuous mode disabled
                                            Dec 19 07:54:32 kernel: xl0: promiscuous mode enabled

                                            also  it does not stop any thing or set off any alerts i am just useing default rules pulled in from snort. let me know what you are all thinking.

                                            Thanks

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.