Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Nut Not working…...... (Solved? Yes... In 1.3 it will be)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    12 Posts 4 Posters 6.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Cry HavokC Offline
      Cry Havok
      last edited by

      You should be posting this in the Packages forum, however…

      Details would be ever so slightly useful!  What version of pfSense, what version of the package, what UPS and how is it connected?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V Offline
        Visseroth
        last edited by

        eh, ooops, well….....

        PfSense 1.2 RC4 (firmware update from rc3) and nut 2.0.4. I would like to run nut 2.4 (If I remember correctly it's 2.4) but it's not listed in the packages and when i try to install it, it says that it has dependencies that are not met.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Cry HavokC Offline
          Cry Havok
          last edited by

          @Cry:

          what UPS and how is it connected?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V Offline
            Visseroth
            last edited by

            Oh, sorry…. APC 750. Connected via USB. It has no serial connection.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R Offline
              rsw686
              last edited by

              @Visseroth:

              I would like to run nut 2.4 (If I remember correctly it's 2.4) but it's not listed in the packages and when i try to install it, it says that it has dependencies that are not met.

              Have a read through http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7673.0.html

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V Offline
                Visseroth
                last edited by

                Yea, read it and tried it but afraid that it did no absolutely no good as I am still new to the linux and BSD world.

                I can't believe that with the final release of PfSense that this was not updated! As far as I'm concerned this needs to be a update to put to the top of the list! For those that are running infrastructures this is a critical piece of software that needs to function correctly.

                I BEG, PLEASE UPDATE NUT!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GruensFroeschliG Offline
                  GruensFroeschli
                  last edited by

                  Packages are not part of pfSense itself.
                  The maintainer of a package is not necessarily one of the developers of pfSense

                  I can't believe that with the final release of PfSense that this was not updated!

                  You could open a bounty and hope someone or the maintainer of the package takes it.

                  We do what we must, because we can.

                  Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • R Offline
                    rsw686
                    last edited by

                    The issue here is that pfSense uses FreeBSD 6.2. The updated Nut port is on FreeBSD 6.3. To insure compatibility we are sticking with the 6.2 version. If the port becomes updated I will update the Nut pfSense package. Otherwise you can install the 6.3 port at your own risk.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V Offline
                      Visseroth
                      last edited by

                      LOL, I leave the risk to the professionals  8)

                      So I guess the question is now, when will 6.3 be implemented?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Cry HavokC Offline
                        Cry Havok
                        last edited by

                        @Visseroth:

                        LOL, I leave the risk to the professionals  8)

                        So I guess the question is now, when will 6.3 be implemented?

                        That's been discussed in another thread (try a search), but the usual answer is "when it is" ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • V Offline
                          Visseroth
                          last edited by

                          OK and thank you everyone for your responses and time. I appreciate it very much as does everyone else that posts!

                          Keep up the good work people!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.