How Far Have You Scaled Your PFS Box?
-
In 3 months time, I expect to be doing about 1gpbs consistently.
What sort of hardware you planning on using for THAT ?
-
@sai:
In 3 months time, I expect to be doing about 1gpbs consistently.
What sort of hardware you planning on using for THAT ?
I've already got 2 Dell 6850's allocated for it. 2950's will do the job easily, but you always want to be prepared for future growth. 6850's will let me ignore any firewall related hardware upgrades in the future.
-
I've already got 2 Dell 6850's allocated for it. 2950's will do the job easily, but you always want to be prepared for future growth. 6850's will let me ignore any firewall related hardware upgrades in the future.
Are you serious? You are my new hero if you are!
-
Yep, I'll be at the datacenter tomorrow, I'll take some pictures of our cage with my phone. We've got 6 6850's in production right now, mostly for database servers. Then another 40 or so 1950's/1850's in our cage, all behind the firewalls - which again, are 1950's for the time being.
1950's will surprise you, before I went live with the pfsense firewalls, I got around 600mbps through them in testing, stable. Bursts up to around 800mbps.
I really don't want to do anymore changes to the firewalls until pfsense 1.2 is released. FreeBSD 7 is going to help things a lot more than you might think.
-
Are you serious? You are my new hero if you are!
Tell me about it. I was pretty stoked about my Epia LN10000EG 1 GHz fanless ITX deployment….."was" being the operative word lol..
But seriously, I think its beautiful that the software scales so dramatically. I'm curious, tho, are there any commercial gateway/firewalls that can handle that kind of load and have a similar feature set as PFS?.... that are within the same price range as a poweredge 6850?
Why would one choose PFS over a Cisco or Foundry, etc?
Once again, out of sheer morbid curiosity ;P
-M@
-
I'm actually in the middle of this argument with one of my bosses. He wants Cisco, mainly because of paid support - which I completely understand. I told him I'm more comfortable with pfsense, I know what it can and can't do. I don't know anything about Cisco IOS.
Plus the Cisco ASA, if you want to get anywhere near 1gpbs, you're looking at $190,000. I'm sorry, it's just not worth it.
He may eventually overrule me on this, and make me dump pfsense, however I really, really don't think he's going to.
-
I'm actually in the middle of this argument with one of my bosses. He wants Cisco, mainly because of paid support - which I completely understand. I told him I'm more comfortable with pfsense, I know what it can and can't do. I don't know anything about Cisco IOS.
Plus the Cisco ASA, if you want to get anywhere near 1gpbs, you're looking at $190,000. I'm sorry, it's just not worth it.
He may eventually overrule me on this, and make me dump pfsense, however I really, really don't think he's going to.
We have paid commercial support. See the front page of pfsense.org :)
-
I have been running pfSense for a while now and I have it running everywhere.
At work I have 3 sets of pfSense firewalls. Primary and failover. They work beautifully. They are all running on Dell Optiplex GX260's which if my memory serves me right, they are around 2.4Ghz each with 1GB RAM and 40GB HD. I originally had 3COM 3c2000 NIC's all over the place, but I had lots of issues so now I run Intel PRO1000's across the board.
Each box runs rock solid and has about 300 computers behind them. We run a lot services from the company, primarly an offsite backup service for a few hundred clients so we have a ton of traffic all the time.
We recently upgraded to a 100mbit internet connection and our ISP recommended we purchase a Cisco 7204 for somethign like $9,000. Well that didn't fly so I slapped pfSense on another GX260 and turned off the firewall so it was just a router and we stress tested the bad boy and were able to achieve a solid 300mbit, which was more than enough. So I ended up paying a grand total of $0, which is just amazing.
I would be able to replace my Cisco PIX's if pfSense could do Policy NAT because we have a few hundred IPSEC Tunnels and as you can imagine, subnets get claimed really fast, so policy NAT is a must.
I recently made a purchase on eBay of 50 Intel Pro 100's, so now whenever one of my coworkers, friends, relatives is in need of a firewall I just tell them to go find a working peice of crap computer and I will set them up an awesome firewall. Needless to say I have a few dozen pfSense boxes runnning at there homes and an IPSEC tunnel to each, for helping them out with comptuer problems, file sharing, etc. I have running at my house an old school P2 300Mhz Overclocked to 450Mhz (thats such an insane increase if you think about it!) with 256mb RAM, 6gb HD. It runs flawlessly. My record uptime was 290 something days, but ofcourse the power went out and killed my record (time for a ups right?).
My only complaint is about the PPTP GRE NAT issue, but really, I love pfSense and have been nothing but pleased over and over and over. Whenever I speak with other IT guys and friends I always promote pfSense, it is simply amazing and well on its way to becoming a Cisco/Checkpoint killer, the other boys cant really hold a candle to pfSense.
Kudos to all you guys who help make pfSense what it is, you rock!!!
-
Our office has a single PII 400 with 128MB RAM and 5 3COM 3C905-TX NICs, 3 of which are currently in use. We have about 50 constant users, and our average bandwidth usage is around 6MBps of our cable connection and 1-1.5 of our DSL. The only service we use so far is ntop, so it doesn't seem to be overloaded yet. This machine was supposed to be just a demo for the bosses, but ended up working so well that we put it in production and it stayed there. Within a few months I'm hoping we'll get permission to buy a new system for it so I can get better traffic filtering in place.
-
Yep, I'll be at the datacenter tomorrow, I'll take some pictures of our cage with my phone. We've got 6 6850's in production right now, mostly for database servers. Then another 40 or so 1950's/1850's in our cage, all behind the firewalls - which again, are 1950's for the time being.
So where are those pictures at foo! ??? ;D
-M@
-
Was in a different post!
http://box.nevernet.com/~foo/IMG00036.jpg
10 6850's, a bunch of 1950's, and a few 1750's. Few Sun boxes, too. In about a week we're going to have a gigantic 3Par (san) cabinet that everything pulls from.
-
Was in a different post!
http://box.nevernet.com/~foo/IMG00036.jpg
10 6850's, a bunch of 1950's, and a few 1750's. Few Sun boxes, too. In about a week we're going to have a gigantic 3Par (san) cabinet that everything pulls from.
/drool
-
After few day of installing, testing, transferring existing rules/routes, and some testing again I can proudly say: New pfsense firewall/router is working instead of Alliedtelesyn Rapier 24i.
I have installed pfsense on Intel sr1350ahlx (dual core xeon, 2 GB RAM, 2x500 GB HDD in RAID 1, 2 integrated Gb NICs and additional PCI-X 2 port Intel Gb NIC). This machine is serving 1 WAN connection (E1, soon double E1) 4 VLANs (in one of VLAN's I have internal routers for 9 other networks), 1 DMZ and one admin network. On VLAN port VLANs are distributed trough gigabit port on AT8000s/24 switch and fiber optics.
Altogether there is around 400 PC's, 30+ servers (Windows and UNIX) few-dozen print-servers, etc.
For now load is minimal. Tomorrow I am adding some IPSec tunnels.
So far this is my biggest pfSense installation.
Sasa
-
My biggest pfSense installation to date is a pair of Dell 1950s that have been running 1.01 flawlessly for something over a year now. They're in a cabinet at a data center, supporting a handful of web servers, a mail and DNS server and a few (non-public) database servers. 95th %ile traffic is around 2 megabits, but we get spikes up to 10 during the day.
I had hoped to use pfSense for the firewall when we moved into our new office space last summer, too, but the Pentium III box I had handy to install the firewall on wouldn't boot either 1.01 or the 1.2 beta, or anything else with a FreeBSD kernel. I never did find out why. Fortunately, it boots OpenBSD just fine, so at least I still get pf, even without the web interface and the additional features I like in pfSense.
-
I had hoped to use pfSense for the firewall when we moved into our new office space last summer, too, but the Pentium III box I had handy to install the firewall on wouldn't boot either 1.01 or the 1.2 beta, or anything else with a FreeBSD kernel. I never did find out why. Fortunately, it boots OpenBSD just fine, so at least I still get pf, even without the web interface and the additional features I like in pfSense.
You should retry with the upcoming 1.3 release which will be based on freebsd 7. Also make sure your bios is up2date and maybe exchange the cdrom. freebsd is sometimes picky about cdroms.
-
Will take a few more pictures on Monday. We've grown considerably since I originally commented on this thread.
-
I had hoped to use pfSense for the firewall when we moved into our new office space last summer, too, but the Pentium III box I had handy to install the firewall on wouldn't boot either 1.01 or the 1.2 beta, or anything else with a FreeBSD kernel. I never did find out why. Fortunately, it boots OpenBSD just fine, so at least I still get pf, even without the web interface and the additional features I like in pfSense.
You should retry with the upcoming 1.3 release which will be based on freebsd 7. Also make sure your bios is up2date and maybe exchange the cdrom. freebsd is sometimes picky about cdroms.
I already tried with a FreeBSD 7 release candidate CD, and again with RELEASE. Those won't boot either. (Neither will 6.2 or Dragonfly, and neither will a hard drive with pfSense installed on it and moved from another box.)
If I were ever to replace that firewall with a different machine, I would try pfSense again. It's been outstanding in our data center cabinet. But for now, the OpenBSD installation we have is working fine.
-
Just for the record, which PIII hardware is that? Motherboard and chipset mf'rer?
-
My setup providing Internet for about 500 people policy based load balancing on 8 x 8/2mbit ADSLs. I left out a lot of details about equipments for the ADSLs, the LAN and layer-2 failover.
| A1 |A2 |A3 |A4 |A5 |A6 |A7 |A8
| | | | | | | |
* VLAN Switch *
| |
****************** sync *******************- PFSense 1.2 * - - - - - - * PFSense 1.2 *
****************** *******************
\ /
*******************
* VLAN Switch *
*******************
/
******************* sync ******************* - PFSense 1.2 * - - - - - - * PFSense 1.2 *
******************* *******************
\ /
*******************
* VLAN Switch * –----------- DMZ (Through the firewall setup)
*******************
|
500 people LAN
./Thomas
- PFSense 1.2 * - - - - - - * PFSense 1.2 *
-
Just for the record, which PIII hardware is that? Motherboard and chipset mf'rer?
Looks like it's not a PIII, it's a Duron. According to dmidecode, the motherboard is an Asus A7N8X2.0 with Phoenix BIOS dated 2003-03-19.
