Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Outbound traffic from WAN couldn't access to web/mail server in NAT of LAN

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    31 Posts 7 Posters 11.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      hoba
      last edited by

      You need a portforward (firewall>nat, portforward). It will create firewallrules automatically by default for the NAT-mappings you create. Depending on what your clients use to connect you will need smtp, pop3, imap and maybe a webmailport to be forwarded. If in doubt check your mailservers manual.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jamesseen
        last edited by

        Thank you for reply….

        I had done the NAT mapping which WAN direct to internal LAN port 80. It is a web server....

        Internet---->WAN---->LAN------>Webserver (e.g. www.bumiasia.com)

        :'( ::) :'( ??? ???

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jamesseen
          last edited by

          I know it is a noob question. I really need a solution!  :'(

          The client machine from LAN is able to access the web server.(done the portforward on LAN interface) However, the client machine from outside Internet is not able to access the web server placed on LAN. (although I had done port forward on WAN interface)

          client–->Internet--->WAN---->pfsense----LAN NAT (web server)  ??? ??? ??? ???

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            Perry
            last edited by

            The more info you provide the more help you will get :)
            http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7001.0.html

            /Perry
            doc.pfsense.org

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GruensFroeschliG
              GruensFroeschli
              last edited by

              Could you provide a screenshot of your NAT and Firewall rules?

              (done the portforward on LAN interface)

              This is wrong. (ok maybe not wrong but unnecessary)
              You create portforwards on the WAN and if you need the forward from the inside to enable "NAT reflection"

              We do what we must, because we can.

              Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jamesseen
                last edited by

                ??? I wonder masters could understand what problem that I mentioned above…. sorry for my so poor english. hardly to express what i wanted to say. I would like to post my network layout. please refer....

                forum.jpg
                forum.jpg_thumb

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jamesseen
                  last edited by

                  What i had achieved from the above network layout (forum.jpg) were the PC (xp machine) within LAN was able to access web hosting (using port forwarding NAT to achieve this although there was an another xyz firewall connected to same network 192.200.9.0 LAN ) and web mail and could access Internet.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jamesseen
                    last edited by

                    Now, the problem I'm facing now assume there is an user PC (XP machine) would like to access to my WebHosting by typing URL from Internet Explorer browser "http://www.bumiasia.com" and that user PC was unable to access it. I had made the port forward on WAN interface as external to NAT IP of my DNS server. Please view my screenshot of it. many thanks!!!

                    ![WAN to NAT DNS.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/WAN to NAT DNS.JPG)
                    ![WAN to NAT DNS.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/WAN to NAT DNS.JPG_thumb)
                    Outside.jpg
                    Outside.jpg_thumb

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • GruensFroeschliG
                      GruensFroeschli
                      last edited by

                      Enable NAT reflection.
                      (advanced)

                      We do what we must, because we can.

                      Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jamesseen
                        last edited by

                        Sir, Enabled NAT reflection also couldn't solve it. The remote user still unable to access the server behind pfSense…. ??? ??? Why is it?? Still there any setting i missed out???  :o

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          cruzades
                          last edited by

                          have you checked your HTTP port yet?

                          try to check it using "grc port scanner".

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            jamesseen
                            last edited by

                            :'( :'( :'( ??? ??? ???

                            The PC from WAN still couldn't access to that web server that sitting behind pfSense…. Someone please guide me..... I had logged the packets that PC from WAN might had be passed through pfSense, but somehow  don't know why that remote PC from WAN couldn't access to the webserver. my server port is 8888. Please help me refer the picture below. Thank you very much!!!

                            diagnose.JPG
                            diagnose.JPG_thumb

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jamesseen
                              last edited by

                              According to nmap scanned on pfsense itself, I noticed the pfSense firewall had not open 8888 port yet, am i correct? Please look at the nmap scan report below.

                              Interesting ports on pfsense.local (192.200.9.7):
                              Not shown: 1694 filtered ports
                              PORT  STATE SERVICE
                              22/tcp open  ssh
                              53/tcp open  domain
                              80/tcp open  http

                              Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 30.299 seconds

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                cruzades
                                last edited by

                                likewise here, i have problem opening my ports 6112-6119, but somewhere in this forum someone suggested to use "Outbound" option at NAT, and click "Manual.. (advance..) and click SAVE, pfsense will generate a list of entry, click Apply.

                                in my case, viola, it opens my ports after this.

                                HTH
                                -cruzades

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J
                                  jamesseen
                                  last edited by

                                  I'd done what you instructed, enable manual…(advance).... yet, still remote pc couldn't access and the port 888 is not opened.

                                  no luck at all ??? >:(

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    jamesseen
                                    last edited by

                                    zzzz…... no one could answer me.... :'(

                                    I think the problem might be XYZ firewall attached to the LAN. The XYZ firewall had blocked the traffic that tried to access web server:888.

                                    What do you guys (masters ) say??

                                    Outside.jpg
                                    Outside.jpg_thumb

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • GruensFroeschliG
                                      GruensFroeschli
                                      last edited by

                                      Your clients/server behind pfSense dont happen to have as default gateway this other firewall, do they?
                                      (What is it doing there anyway?)

                                      We do what we must, because we can.

                                      Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        jamesseen
                                        last edited by

                                        Actually, XYZ firewall is currently in use and I wanted to replace it with pfSense in future due to XZY has limited features provided and one day XYZ firewall will be removed…..

                                        I'm sorry, I can't get you. Are you asking the Client/Server do not have default gateway of pfSense instead of XYZ firewall as their default gateway. Is that what u were saying? Hhmmm...I'll check it. :o Thank you!!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          maaraujo
                                          last edited by

                                          In your diagram I see you have a private IP on your WAN interface and a public IP on your LAN. Did you configure your network in this way for a particular reason?.

                                          If so, how is Interfaces/WAN/Block Private Networks set?.

                                          Saludos.

                                          Miguel Ángel Araujo
                                          México

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • J
                                            jamesseen
                                            last edited by

                                            Dear maaraojo, by default, Interfaces/WAN/Block Private Network was checked…. Does it block traffic from WAN to LAN? I hope it is not.

                                            Hmm, I checked those servers. It is indeed those servers default gateway were not set to pfSense Box. Should I need to set their default gateway to pfSense box? I heard one of my friend said that it is not necessary must set those servers default gateway to pfSense box. He said install a proxy server on pfSense box would solve those default gateway. What he said was correct???? Need advice..... ??? ???

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.