Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    What interface for Carp ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
    7 Posts 3 Posters 3.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      pitabata
      last edited by

      Hi all

      I try to build a cluster with pfsense(v 1.0.1). so i need to install carp following to the tutorial below (http://pfsense.iserv.nl/tutorials/carp/carp_cluster.htm) !!
      But on the list of available packages, i do not have CARP  ??? ???

      I have (for example) Dashboard , Lightsquid  , OpenBGPD  ,Zabbix Agent  , ….. but not CARP!!

      Please help  :'( :'( :'(

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dotdashD
        dotdash
        last edited by

        That is a really old tutorial. A package is no longer needed for CARP.
        Look at this instead: http://www.pfsense.org/mirror.php?section=tutorials/carp/carp-cluster-new.htm

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          pitabata
          last edited by

          Ok, i have tried that link since this morning with IE7 but nothing appaears, i have a white window.
          With firefox, it works  ;D ;D ;D ;D

          Thanks a lot  8)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pitabata
            last edited by

            Again .. !!

            Here is what we have: Wan –- Dmz --- Lan On 2 Pfsense!

            To build the cluster, should i have another card(opt2) on both pfsense or can i active it on the wan interface??

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dotdashD
              dotdash
              last edited by

              It is highly recommended to run a separate sync interface, but you can run it on an existing interface. I think it would be a better idea to use the LAN and not the WAN for sync if you did not have the fourth interface.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                hoba
                last edited by

                Never set WAN as your sync interface. Syncmessages are statemessages, so an attacker could send an openstate message and punch holes in your firewall this way. That's why you should usually run a dedicated sync interface. You also could set this up with vlans if the ports on your hardware are limitted. This would require a vlancapable switch then though. If you want to run it on one of the existing interfaces LAN is the safest zone to have it running on.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  pitabata
                  last edited by

                  Ok, I think it is safer to buy a fourth card!! Thank for advices!!  ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.