Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    SpamD Package Needs Testers

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    80 Posts 13 Posters 37.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      Guest
      last edited by

      I'm still trying to chase down why this happened and what the details are, but as soon as I removed a blacklist from the spamd configuration, my shaper rules blew up:

      Apr 28 16:54:07 spamlogd[81627]: exiting
      Apr 28 16:54:07 spamlogd[81627]: exiting
      Apr 28 16:54:09 spamd[77903]: listening for incoming connections.
      Apr 28 16:54:09 spamd[77903]: listening for incoming connections.
      Apr 28 16:54:12 check_reload_status: reloading filter
      Apr 28 16:54:16 php: : New alert found: There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:41: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:46: queue qlanRoot has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:46: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:48: queue qlandef has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:48: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:50: queue qlanacks has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:50: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:52: queue qPenaltyDown has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:52: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.de
      Apr 28 16:54:16 php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:41: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:46: queue qlanRoot has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:46: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:48: queue qlandef has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:48: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:50: queue qlanacks has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:50: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:52: queue qPenaltyDown has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:52: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:54: queue qP2
      Apr 28 16:55:35 spamlogd[77901]: exiting
      Apr 28 16:55:35 spamlogd[77901]: exiting
      Apr 28 16:55:38 spamd[78329]: listening for incoming connections.
      Apr 28 16:55:38 spamd[78329]: listening for incoming connections.
      Apr 28 16:55:41 check_reload_status: reloading filter
      Apr 28 16:55:46 php: : New alert found: There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:41: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:46: queue qlanRoot has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:46: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:48: queue qlandef has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:48: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:50: queue qlanacks has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:50: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:52: queue qPenaltyDown has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:52: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.de
      Apr 28 16:55:46 php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:41: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:46: queue qlanRoot has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:46: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:48: queue qlandef has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:48: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:50: queue qlanacks has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:50: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:52: queue qPenaltyDown has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:52: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:54: queue qP2
      Apr 28 16:56:06 check_reload_status: reloading filter
      Apr 28 16:56:16 php: : New alert found: There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:41: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:46: queue qlanRoot has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:46: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:48: queue qlandef has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:48: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:50: queue qlanacks has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:50: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:52: queue qPenaltyDown has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:52: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.de
      Apr 28 16:56:16 php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:41: syntax error /tmp/rules.debug:46: queue qlanRoot has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:46: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:48: queue qlandef has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:48: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:50: queue qlanacks has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:50: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:52: queue qPenaltyDown has no parent /tmp/rules.debug:52: errors in queue definition /tmp/rules.debug:54: queue qP2

      Anyone seen anything like this?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        last edited by

        Yep, its definitely related to spamd, I had to kill the install of spamd and now the shaper rules are not broken anymore.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          sullrich
          last edited by

          I don't see any way that it could be linked to SpamD.  I'll have to speak with eri

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            sullrich
            last edited by

            submicron, please send a broken rules.debug to my email (gmail).  Thanks

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              I'm still trying to reliably re-create it, if I can, I'll send you the rules.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                sullrich
                last edited by

                Just fixed all the button operations, delete, spamtrap, etc.  Please test!!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  Guest
                  last edited by

                  I just re-installed the package and the jiggly buttons that do nothing still seem to be there.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    sullrich
                    last edited by

                    They are still there, but they do work now…  Or at least the delete function button worked for me?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      Guest
                      last edited by

                      Apparently they work, but only if you reload the page manually.  My personal feeling is that pressing the buttons should cause the page to reload itself, otherwise you'll have lots of people frustratedly thinking that the buttons don't work.

                      Also, on that same page, the database totals apparently don't work.  I have several items listed as "Whitelisted" but the totals show 0 items whitelisted.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        sullrich
                        last edited by

                        @submicron:

                        Apparently they work, but only if you reload the page manually.  My personal feeling is that pressing the buttons should cause the page to reload itself, otherwise you'll have lots of people frustratedly thinking that the buttons don't work.

                        Also, on that same page, the database totals apparently don't work.  I have several items listed as "Whitelisted" but the totals show 0 items whitelisted.

                        There is a little blurb about that on the page at the bottom.  The idea is being able to rapdily delete, deny or whitelist a number of domains without having to wait on page reloads…  So I dunno, I personally like the ajax option but maybe we just need to hide the table row after an operation occurs.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          Guest
                          last edited by

                          Yeah probably, since we all know that nobody reads the helpful little blurbs.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • G
                            glanc
                            last edited by

                            Hi! I would like to test spamD, on one of my pfsense installation, but i need some guide on setting it up. I've read the man page on openbsd site just to have a clue, but a quick howto would speed things up.

                            The idea is to let my pfsense box be a gateway for our internal exchange server, that is being flooded with spam right now  :-.

                            Thanks.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              Guest
                              last edited by

                              The package is really for testing right now, I wouldn't recommend putting it in production unless you 1) know what you're doing or 2) can tolerate potential lost email.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • G
                                glanc
                                last edited by

                                Ok. You would not implement it at this point!  :-[ Anyway i can help to accellerate the testing process? I was testing it with vmware.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • H
                                  hammeraus001
                                  last edited by

                                  Installed at 8:15am Thursday 8/5/2008.

                                  So far, no bugs or issues - working perfectly.  Spam hitting the server has dropped dramatically.

                                  From start of April to time of installation - 10864
                                  Since installation to 10:00am 15/5/2008 - 193

                                  98.15% drop (and growing) in Spam hitting the mail server.

                                  Will be testing pfSense including SpamD under VMWare in the next week.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    Guest
                                    last edited by

                                    Hammeraus,

                                    For those people who are wanting to test this package, would you mind telling people how you have yours configured?  There are a lot of people who want to test this, but many of them don't know where to begin.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T
                                      technopop
                                      last edited by

                                      Been using PF/Spamd for a couple years on another system with tweaking here and there…

                                      With the pfsense package, I set the numbers low and it seems to block out the majority of spam while keeping late deliveries to a minimum.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ?
                                        Guest
                                        last edited by

                                        Is anyone currently using the spamd package in a CARP cluster?  We definitely need more people pounding on this package in that type of environment.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ?
                                          Guest
                                          last edited by

                                          Whitelisting - it should be possible to create a whitelist of a range of IPs instead of having to whitelist a single IP address.  For larger sites like gmail it may be desirable to whitelist all their _spf.google.com ranges.  Currently, the GUI doesn't seem to support this.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • ?
                                            Guest
                                            last edited by

                                            Additionally missing is support for spamd.alloweddomains which might be another way to deal with the whitelisting problem.  Again, this isn't going to be the right answer for everyone, but some customers will not want to wait for over and hour for inbound email to bypass their spam filter.  The ability to add domains to alloweddomains will solve this issue.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.