Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Traffic shaper changes [90% completed, please send money to complete bounty]

    Completed Bounties
    72
    375
    462.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dps
      last edited by

      Guys,

      How can i have access to the image with the multi nic shapper?

      Thank You!

      Duarte Santos

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        Perry
        last edited by

        If you donate xxx$ to it you'll get access.

        Please read every reply in this topic before asking any additional questions.

        /Perry
        doc.pfsense.org

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          medien
          last edited by

          multi lan in 1 WAN is very interesting.i hope you can develop per ip bandwidth limiting.thats what everybodys newbie waiting i think.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            eri--
            last edited by

            Well expect surprises fro 1.3 or give it a thought/contribution for 1.2 :P.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              ccfiel
              last edited by

              Good Day to all!

              Our small company needs a firewall with the following features. Does pfSense support the following requirements? We are willing to donate if it can fulfill the needs stated below.

              1. Support Dual WAN
              2. Traffic Shaper for Dual WAN ( distribute bandwidth equally for every workstation that uses the internet ) <–- i think this is the bounty?
              3. Web Proxy
              4. Samba

              Hope somebody can give me some info. Thanks and more power!

              Chris

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E
                eri--
                last edited by

                The current implementation that is ported to 1.2 that the bounty covered offers this through CBQ and with intimate knowledge with HFSC.

                Actually 1.3 would be the release which will really be my recommendation for this.

                AFAIK you can sponsor it somemore to get the 1.3 improvements to 1.2.

                Ermal

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  tomdchi
                  last edited by

                  I just sent $100 to paypal@chrisbuechler.com.  I just started using pfsense last week and 1.3 would be a great help!

                  My paypal address used was billing@alumnipropertygroup.com

                  Thanks!
                  Tom

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    tomdchi
                    last edited by

                    Just upgraded and WOW, this new shaper is AWESOME!!  Just what I needed!!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      sullrich
                      last edited by

                      @tomdchi:

                      Just upgraded and WOW, this new shaper is AWESOME!!  Just what I needed!!

                      Nice!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        ccfiel
                        last edited by

                        Hello I have donated $25 to paypal@chrisbuechler.com. Hope this little donation can bring more innovations! :) How can test this features? Thanks in advance and more power!

                        Chris

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          eri--
                          last edited by

                          For all of you that are running the new shaper with multiple interfaces there is a bug that will prevent it from working correctly.
                          Please see http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/chngview?cn=23485 and make the change manually for now until a new update is released to you.

                          @ccfiel
                          read your private messages.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            ccfiel
                            last edited by

                            I have tried the new filter.inc. but there is an error when loading pfsense. Fatal error: Call to undefined function: get_configured_interface_with_descr() in /etc/inc/filter.inc on line 431. any ideas? :)

                            Chris

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              eri--
                              last edited by

                              Just change the lines i have sent in the link above.

                              What you have done is taking the filter.inc from RELENG_1(aka 1.3), DO NOT DO THAT.
                              RELENG_1 is way changed from RELENG_1_2.

                              Ermal

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                ccfiel
                                last edited by

                                hello ermal , oh i see. I just want to make sure if what i did is correct. this is what i have in line 2170. so i have to delete this 4 lines?

                                let out anything from the firewall host itself and decrypted IPsec traffic

                                pass out on $lan proto icmp keep state label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
                                pass out on $wan proto icmp keep state label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
                                pass out on $wanif all keep state label "let out anything from firewall host itself"

                                and add this 3 lines ?

                                let out anything from the firewall host itself and decrypted IPsec traffic

                                pass  out  on  {$oc['if']}  proto  icmp  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"
                                pass  out  on  {$oc['if']}  all  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"

                                is this correct?

                                Chris

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • E
                                  eri--
                                  last edited by

                                  Just replace the file in /etc/inc/filter.inc with the content from this LINK and you should be ok.

                                  Otherwise you just need to delete this 2 lines:
                                  pass  quick on  {$oc['if']}  proto  icmp  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"
                                  pass  quick on  {$oc['if']}  all  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"

                                  and make them

                                  pass  out  on  {$oc['if']}  proto  icmp  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"
                                  pass  out  on  {$oc['if']}  all  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"

                                  Whichever your prefer.

                                  Ermal

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • V
                                    venis_LA
                                    last edited by

                                    i'm a newbie and want to know where and how can i contribute to get a copy to test 1.3 … many thanks thanks

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E
                                      eri--
                                      last edited by

                                      You want access to the new shaper on 1.2 or have you replied on the wrong thread?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • V
                                        venis_LA
                                        last edited by

                                        i want access to the new shaper .. thanks

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • E
                                          eri--
                                          last edited by

                                          Well you can send the offerings at ermal.luci@gmail.com and i will give you the link to the new shaper.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C
                                            ccfiel
                                            last edited by

                                            ermal, would the new traffic shaper allow you to distribute evenly bandwidth to the active workstations. example i have 2mb bandwidth. first  workstation 1 download a file so it gets the 2mb. after minute workstation 2 start download another file so workstation 1 gets 1mb and workstation 2 gets 1mb. is this possible with the new traffic shaper?

                                            chris

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.