• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Traffic shaper changes [90% completed, please send money to complete bounty]

Completed Bounties
72
375
462.4k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    ccfiel
    last edited by Jul 1, 2008, 3:24 PM

    Hello I have donated $25 to paypal@chrisbuechler.com. Hope this little donation can bring more innovations! :) How can test this features? Thanks in advance and more power!

    Chris

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • E
      eri--
      last edited by Jul 2, 2008, 5:00 PM

      For all of you that are running the new shaper with multiple interfaces there is a bug that will prevent it from working correctly.
      Please see http://cvstrac.pfsense.org/chngview?cn=23485 and make the change manually for now until a new update is released to you.

      @ccfiel
      read your private messages.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        ccfiel
        last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 2:21 AM

        I have tried the new filter.inc. but there is an error when loading pfsense. Fatal error: Call to undefined function: get_configured_interface_with_descr() in /etc/inc/filter.inc on line 431. any ideas? :)

        Chris

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          eri--
          last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 6:44 AM

          Just change the lines i have sent in the link above.

          What you have done is taking the filter.inc from RELENG_1(aka 1.3), DO NOT DO THAT.
          RELENG_1 is way changed from RELENG_1_2.

          Ermal

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            ccfiel
            last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 9:32 AM Jul 3, 2008, 9:24 AM

            hello ermal , oh i see. I just want to make sure if what i did is correct. this is what i have in line 2170. so i have to delete this 4 lines?

            let out anything from the firewall host itself and decrypted IPsec traffic

            pass out on $lan proto icmp keep state label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
            pass out on $wan proto icmp keep state label "let out anything from firewall host itself"
            pass out on $wanif all keep state label "let out anything from firewall host itself"

            and add this 3 lines ?

            let out anything from the firewall host itself and decrypted IPsec traffic

            pass  out  on  {$oc['if']}  proto  icmp  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"
            pass  out  on  {$oc['if']}  all  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"

            is this correct?

            Chris

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              eri--
              last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 11:16 AM

              Just replace the file in /etc/inc/filter.inc with the content from this LINK and you should be ok.

              Otherwise you just need to delete this 2 lines:
              pass  quick on  {$oc['if']}  proto  icmp  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"
              pass  quick on  {$oc['if']}  all  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"

              and make them

              pass  out  on  {$oc['if']}  proto  icmp  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"
              pass  out  on  {$oc['if']}  all  keep  state  label  "let  out  anything  from  firewall  host  itself"

              Whichever your prefer.

              Ermal

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                venis_LA
                last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 3:04 PM

                i'm a newbie and want to know where and how can i contribute to get a copy to test 1.3 … many thanks thanks

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  eri--
                  last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 3:52 PM

                  You want access to the new shaper on 1.2 or have you replied on the wrong thread?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    venis_LA
                    last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 5:27 PM

                    i want access to the new shaper .. thanks

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      eri--
                      last edited by Jul 3, 2008, 6:20 PM

                      Well you can send the offerings at ermal.luci@gmail.com and i will give you the link to the new shaper.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        ccfiel
                        last edited by Jul 4, 2008, 10:21 PM

                        ermal, would the new traffic shaper allow you to distribute evenly bandwidth to the active workstations. example i have 2mb bandwidth. first  workstation 1 download a file so it gets the 2mb. after minute workstation 2 start download another file so workstation 1 gets 1mb and workstation 2 gets 1mb. is this possible with the new traffic shaper?

                        chris

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          eri--
                          last edited by Jul 4, 2008, 11:44 PM

                          yes, just use CBQ discipline and it will setup you up for that.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            ccfiel
                            last edited by Jul 5, 2008, 4:19 PM

                            Hello ermal. I have send you a private message about the traffic shaper

                            Chris

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • V
                              venis_LA
                              last edited by Jul 7, 2008, 2:25 PM

                              Hello Ermal, I've made myccontribution but have not gotten any links to the new shaper,kindly advise. Thanks.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                eri--
                                last edited by Jul 7, 2008, 4:13 PM

                                Check you mail i sent the reply with instructions.

                                Sorry but my connection has been spooky and am replying from another location right now.

                                Ermal

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  ccfiel
                                  last edited by Jul 9, 2008, 1:35 PM

                                  ermal, i have notice that sticky connection was missing. is this a bug?

                                  chris

                                  Screenshot.png
                                  Screenshot.png_thumb

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • E
                                    eri--
                                    last edited by Jul 9, 2008, 2:31 PM

                                    Will check it before making available the other image.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      ccfiel
                                      last edited by Jul 9, 2008, 4:10 PM

                                      ok thanks ermal! and load balance does not work :(

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • E
                                        eri--
                                        last edited by Jul 9, 2008, 5:09 PM

                                        What do you mean by load balance does not work?!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • C
                                          ccfiel
                                          last edited by Jul 9, 2008, 6:32 PM

                                          ermal, I have tried to enable the load balance but only the WAN1 will get all the load but it works well in 1.2 official release. is this also a bug? or just missing something?

                                          chris

                                          Pool.jpg
                                          Pool.jpg_thumb
                                          Rules.jpg
                                          Rules.jpg_thumb
                                          Status.jpg
                                          Status.jpg_thumb

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          313 out of 375
                                          • First post
                                            313/375
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.