Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Call of duty 4 rules - what am i doing wrong?

    Traffic Shaping
    3
    3
    2.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      driftdamage
      last edited by

      edit: after a bit of playing around it looks like the traffic shaper can only pick up http, all other traffic is thrown in the p2p catch all. even with a simple rule such as lan->wan, source 10.0.0.1 dest anywhere or wan->lan source anywhere dest 10.0.0.1.
      Even using the traffic shaper wizard to set the priorities does not work and when playing any of the games that the wizard has set higher all the traffic is put in the lower queues.

      I went through the wizard and setup http being higher, p2pcatchall being low etc.
      I just made rules for a cod4 server I host that me and some friends play on, but I cannot seem to make it recognise it and put it into the correct queue (gaming queue renamed from original)
      The port it runs on is 28960 and the local ip for the server is 10.0.0.1

      All the cod4 traffic still gets dumped into the p2pcatchall
      Have I configured it wrong?
      These are the states that are what I based my rules off

      Any help would be much appreciated.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kextyn
        last edited by

        I cannot seem to make it recognise it and put it into the correct queue (gaming queue renamed from original)

        You said you renamed the gaming queue from the original, but isn't the original qGamesUp and qGamesDown?  Your rules still show the default queue name.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • GruensFroeschliG
          GruensFroeschli
          last edited by

          I'm not really familiar with custom traffic shaping rules, but your first rule shows:
          source: LAN-net, source-port:28960
          destionation: any, destination-port: any

          This will never happen, because the source port is something random.

          I suppose this rule should look like:
          source: LAN-net, source-port: any
          destionation: any, destination-port: 28960

          We do what we must, because we can.

          Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.