Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    A queue used for varios IPs = PROBLEM

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    12 Posts 2 Posters 5.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      EduFrazao
      last edited by

      Im tryng to use it on 1.3 too, but, when I choose the IN/OUT limiter ( Inserted In Firewall / Traffic Shapping / Limiter ), the traffic stop…

      I can conect on a WebServer in example, BUT, nothing returns... If i
      n the same rule, I change the In/Out limiter to NONE, all works...

      Can you help me to make a correct limiter?

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        eri--
        last edited by

        Simple enough you need to 2 limiters 1 for in and one for out.
        Create one with src-mask and the other with dst-mask

        For in choose limiter with src-mask and out the one with dst-mask
        That should do it.
        If it does not post screenshots, config.xml and /tmp/rules.debug here for review.

        I assume the rule that you set in and out is in one of your lans.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          EduFrazao
          last edited by

          The problem continues…

          Ive Posted some ScreenShots, Config, and Debug files, as solicited...

          This is the Limiter IN

          This is the Limiter OUT

          Firewall LanRules

          Firewall Default Lan Rule ( Was This Rule that Ive changed to use the Limiter IN/OUT)

          This is a Download with Limiters Turned ON in the firewall rule…
          Note that connection was maded, but the return can reach the destination ( at least I think that )

          And NOW, a Download if I remove the limiters from the rule:

          HERE is my /tmp/rules.debug:
          http://pastebin.com/f274b1ab

          And, here is my config.xml ( /cf/conf/config.xml )
          http://pastebin.com/f3b36e187

          Please… If anyone can Helpme...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            EduFrazao
            last edited by

            Only for information: This is the version Alpha that Im using:  pfSense-20081024-1237.iso

            Thanks a lot

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              EduFrazao
              last edited by

              Another thing that ive noted is:

              When the LIMITERS is ON on the firewall rule, any tcp connection that I make, open two conections on PfTOP..

              One, with State in 4:4 and other in State 4:2

              If I try in example, to conect on a smtp server, via telnet, I reach..  But any data is received ( even the Wellcome message of the SMTP Server ).

              When I remove the Limiters from the rule, I reach to connect in the same SMTP Server, and operate with him normally..

              IN PFTOP, appears two conections too, but both in State 4:4

              I Dont know what this states can tell, everyway, im here posting :)…

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E
                EduFrazao
                last edited by

                Other Information: In a ping test, with 100 packs..

                ALWAYS occour 92% of loose… Always.. The same loose count...

                The packet loss of the queue is 0... Ive config it to 1, to test, but Ive got the same result...

                Please... Anyone can Helpme?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  eri--
                  last edited by

                  Can you try one of the latest snapshots the limiter should behave correctly now since i fixed the issues.
                  Please give me a confirmation on this.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    EduFrazao
                    last edited by

                    Oh… Thank you so mutch Ermal... I will test it now!!!

                    And, came back to do a feedback!

                    Thanks again!!!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      EduFrazao
                      last edited by

                      OH.. Its seens to be working now…

                      I will do more tests with more complex filter rules and aliases...

                      For success or not, i will reply here ok???

                      IMENSE thanks!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E
                        eri--
                        last edited by

                        Can i have some feedback from this?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.