Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    ProxyARP without PPPoE?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    8 Posts 3 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jonnytabpni
      last edited by

      Hi folks,

      Since pfSense doesn't support MLPPP (Bonded DSL), I am thinking about using tomato with MLPPP to bond my 2 ADSL lines together (Pending my ISP's approval of course). My ISP currently give me 16 static IP addresses and currently my pfsense box is using pppoe and ProxyARP to use them.

      I would still like to use pfsense as my firewall though so I was wondering, if I set up tomato routing to allow me to assign public IP addresses on ITS (tomato's) LAN side, would pfsense's proxyARP feature work with this (of course, the pfsense box won't be doing PPPoE anymore)?

      So:

      (== is 2 DSL lines comming into building)

      Telco Exchange========Tomato/MLPPP–------pfsense with multiple public IP's assigned to WAN interface using ProxyARP------LAN computers.

      Cheers

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cmb
        last edited by

        If Tomato can bridge the connection over to your pfSense box, that'll work. If it forces you to NAT or route, it won't.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jonnytabpni
          last edited by

          Hi cmb,

          Thanks for your answer.

          What the difference between "bridge" and "route" in the context that you use?
          I will def not be natting over but I was thinking of..well I don't know what the name of it is but I will be allowing public IP's on the LAN side of tomato (Using the subnet which my ISP has given me).

          pfSense will not be doing any PPPoE/PPTP connections

          Thanks

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cmb
            last edited by

            Layer 2 (bridge) vs. layer 3 (route or NAT). ARP is L2, if your router forces L3 your proxy ARP from its inside won't work.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D
              dragon2611
              last edited by

              I could never get proxy ARP to actually work  ???

              Although when I added my IP's as CARP they worked then (infact that's how i actually have them at the moment)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                cmb
                last edited by

                It's just ARP either way. I'm not familiar with Tomato so I don't know if it's capable of bridging the PPPoE over to the inside interface or not, might be a better question for their forum/mailing list.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jonnytabpni
                  last edited by

                  the pppoe won't be bridged over to the pfsense box. The reason why the tomato box has to do pppoe is because it will be doing MLPPP (Bonded ADSL).

                  I guess my suitation is that (In VERY general terms), can a LAN machine have one MAC address but multiple IP's on the same interface using proxyARP?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jonnytabpni
                    last edited by

                    here is a picture of what I'm trying to do:

                    http://www.tripathy.org/mlppp.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.